Khan versus Riddick

Started by RJ 2.047 pages

Lol, Quan getting beat down as usual.

Originally posted by RJ 2.0
Lol, Quan getting beat down as usual.
How so ? Try to actually debate for a change.

pot calling the kettle black

Originally posted by quanchi112
You proved your ignorance before me. I even tried letting you off the hook. Your grammar makes me hate you. Khan doesn't need goggles. Riddick clearly does.

wow speaking of ignorance where is the proof khan has better vision.. as said before hand riddick uses to goggles to protect himself from too much ambient light, which he can see in without goggles. he doesnt need goggles to see in the dark because he is a furyan

is starting to think you aint seen the movies in relating to riddick.

The goggles in no way increase Riddick's night vision, so everyone thank quan again for agreeing with the fact that Riddick does in fact have better night vision.

Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier
pot calling the kettle black
This from the guy hitting on a girl in the what do you look like thread. 😂

Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier
wow speaking of ignorance where is the proof khan has better vision.. as said before hand riddick uses to goggles to protect himself from too much ambient light, which he can see in without goggles. he doesnt need goggles to see in the dark because he is a furyan

is starting to think you aint seen the movies in relating to riddick.

Younjust said he needs to protect his eyes so this his vision is weaker and thus he is dependent on goggles. Khan is not. Case closed, pervert.

Originally posted by Silent Master
The goggles in no way increase Riddick's night vision, so everyone thank quan again for agreeing with the fact that Riddick does in fact have better night vision.
Khan's vision is superior. Period. Thank Sm for continuing to spike my post count.

Originally posted by quanchi112
This from the guy hitting on a girl in the what do you look like thread. 😂

quan the diffrence between you and me is
1. i am taller
2. i actually have a dig
3. i explain my feats when i can
4. i don't take it in the arse from my rolemodles

and 5. i explain im not hitting on, just complimenting

Originally posted by quanchi112
Younjust said he needs to protect his eyes so this his vision is weaker and thus he is dependent on goggles. Khan is not. Case closed, pervert.

correction butt Hurt incarnate, i said he needs it against strong ambient light.

so where is it said khan can see in the dark

Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier
quan the diffrence between you and me is
1. i am taller
2. i actually have a dig
3. i explain my feats when i can
4. i don't take it in the arse from my rolemodles

and 5. i explain im not hitting on, just complimenting

1. And uglier
2. A dig ? Wtf are you talking about, pervert.
3. No, you don't.

4. Yes, you do.

You failed. You're a pervert.

Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier
correction butt Hurt incarnate, i said he needs it against strong ambient light.

so where is it said khan can see in the dark

He needs his eyes to be protected. I get it. His vision needs help. Khan's does not.

to see in the dark he does. unless you can prove khan can see in absolute darkness

Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier
to see in the dark he does. unless you can prove khan can see in absolute darkness
I already proved Riddick's vision has weakness. Game over.

have weakness does not degrade advantage

Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier
have weakness does not degrade advantage
It shows a weakness. Khan's vision does not have a weakness.

he can't see in the dark = weakness

Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier
he can't see in the dark = weakness
You made a claim so prove it.

as the fight takes place in well lit, dimly lit and non lit areas riddick's vison is superior to khans. riddick has his goggles if the well lit areas are too much for him and he can take off his goggles to fight in the dark as we have seen him do multiple times.

seeing as Khan has no feats involving being able to see in the dark, just well lit and dimly lit areas he is visually on par with Riddick in these areas BUT in Darkness he is at a total disadvantage because as i said before he cannot see when riddick clearly can and has been proven to in "riddick" "chrnicles of Riddick"

Riddick is stronger then Khan as he has taken down bigger foes and over powered a incredibly muscled henchman who held riddick in a almost no leverage position and riddick still had the strength to get out of that situation.

riddick has decapitated a man whilst chained. khan has not shown any skill level near this

riddick is an assassin who is clearly efficient with knives and has better knife feats then Khan has displayed

Originally posted by Genesis-Soldier
as the fight takes place in well lit, dimly lit and non lit areas riddick's vison is superior to khans. riddick has his goggles if the well lit areas are too much for him and he can take off his goggles to fight in the dark as we have seen him do multiple times.

seeing as Khan has no feats involving being able to see in the dark, just well lit and dimly lit areas he is visually on par with Riddick in these areas BUT in Darkness he is at a total disadvantage because as i said before he cannot see when riddick clearly can and has been proven to in "riddick" "chrnicles of Riddick"

Riddick is stronger then Khan as he has taken down bigger foes and over powered a incredibly muscled henchman who held riddick in a almost no leverage position and riddick still had the strength to get out of that situation.

riddick has decapitated a man whilst chained. khan has not shown any skill level near this

riddick is an assassin who is clearly efficient with knives and has better knife feats then Khan has displayed

You said you can prove Khan's vision is weak in the darkness. What evidence do you have ?

Nothing Riddick has done is more impressive strength wise than the skull crush. Riddick also missed and was getting soundly crushed against the lord marshal. He was also ko'd in Riddick after he was tranq'd.

Khan crushes his skull.