Originally posted by carthage
He was amped and Malgus has superior feats across the board than Bane in all other areas.
What the **** do you mean he was amped?
Originally posted by carthage
Everything stated in text doesn't make rain drops any faster than blaster bolts. Try again.
You would have a point here if either Vader or Malgus were defending themselves from nearly as many blasterbolts as Bane was raindrops.
Originally posted by carthage
He has no unamped force feats to suggest he can defeat any of them or kill them with his power. His lightning can be absorbed by a saber, his TK only killed non force sensitives in DOE, and his feats unamped are pathetic.
LOL Githany is very inferior to even POD Bane. The text also states that Lsu isn't good at defending against force attacks.
Originally posted by carthage
Glad to admit you think deflecting slower moving rain drops is more impressive than blaster bolts. His feat is inferior by virtue of that. Even Qui Gon Jin moved his saber fast enough to form a shield similar to what Bane did. You aren't proving anything using non cannon calculations, and bringing up a feat that even PT Jedi have duplicated lol
The text pretty much confirms that Bane's rainstorm feat>>>>Vader and Malgus's feats of deflecting fire from three shooters.
Your inability to grasp something so simple concerns me greatly.
Originally posted by carthage
Who cares? Bane was still invulnerable to most of her attacks, and he was amped as well. He wasn't "negated" at all. Raskta was the only one effectively fighting, everyone else was useless. Even then she still stabbed him six times before he reached her, and her reflexes in an unamped duel as an Echani would be better than his as he's slower and weaker.
Bane's invulnerability had nothing to do with that maneuver. Battle meditation is confirmed to negate enemies btw. Her stabbing him six times doesn't mean he couldn't block her blows, he just didn't because he had no need to.