OWAW Thor

Started by DarkOdin16 pages

Originally posted by abhilegend
Lowballing it? Why would anybody post someone reading the "Guide to norse religion" as a proof that World Tree contains the Earth is beyond me.

That was a story inside a story. Not to mention, the world tree was dying as revealed later in Thor 501. So its a completely unquantifiable feat. To assign it as a planetary or whatever level is faulty. Much less universal level which Bran is suggesting.

uhuh

I grasped it very firmly. Your denial isn't a proof. "World shattered" was stated six times on panel.

Not really. Kryptonian dragon=/=struggling to contain a moon.

And concession accepted.

and he did it, Well the diying world tree still contains all the realms in its roots dying or not, it also had enough power to kill thor if enchantress didn't intervene and it took out brb. dying or not it still had plenty of power but go ahead you thor hate is strong

Originally posted by DarkOdin
and he did it, Well the diying world tree still contains all the realms in its roots dying or not, it also had enough power to kill thor if enchantress didn't intervene and it took out brb. dying or not it still had plenty of power but go ahead you thor hate is strong

At that point, World Tree was a nexus. It didn't contain anything in its roots or such.

Yeah, it had power over asgardians and Enchantress made Thor invisible to it. Guess Enchantress is more powerful than everybody else.

I just called it an unquantifiable feat, what's hating in it? But if you really want to compare unquantifiable feats, you're against the wrong character here. Superman and Captain Marvel lifted a book that contained the ****ing multiverse. How much stronger than Thor they are now?

Originally posted by DarkOdin
ok abhilegend please try to lowball the world engine feat again 😮‍💨
😂

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
And I'm the one who brought up planet destroying. Now you're saying my statement doesn't apply because it doesn't follow your guidelines... makes sense.
My guidelines? Bran, do you even remember your argument, why you brought up Thor being able to destroy planets? It was because you tried to make a point about how he and Superman have basically equivalent strength feats [Superman bench-pressing Earth and Thor being capable of destroying it], and thus any of them could conceivably replicate the other's feat. I'll even quote you on it:
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
When in reality both are impossibly impressive in both comics and the real world. Until one can definitively prove one is better than the other outside analogies that so obviously favor their stance[...]Looking at it feat wise. Superman can lift the Earth but can't destroy it. Thor can destroy the Earth but can't lift it. [...]I'm sure push comes to shove both could do the other

The problem is that you were wrong. The Beta Ray Bill feat you brought up implies a shitload of other factors besides strength, like: trans-light momentum bullrushing of a celestial body alongside another fighter in an energy engulfed 'projectile.

That does not even belong in the same world as Superman bench-pressing the Earth. In that situation, velocity and durability is much more important than pure strength. Beta Ray Bill's feat [and by proxy, Thor's] doesn't imply the strength necessary to bench-press a planet, no matter how hard you'd want it, in order for him and Superman to be in the same class.

In other words, your argument is non-existent, in this case. You have none.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Here is Thor shitting his pants according to Phildo when all he is doing is jumping through the air readying a hammer shot:
Holy shit, Bran, so you're saying that the circled panel here doesn't show him shitting himself with effort, just because there's another scene where he lends off the same scream in another circumstance?

He's with his eyes closed, grinding his teeth and lending a scream as he pushes to get the part of the moon back in place.

According to Bran logic? That's just a standard scream.

You've gone full retard.

From this point on, at least in this thread, I'll be calling you Brarver.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Was he screaming in the two panels he pushed a moon back together, or was he screaming for the immediate reforming of the moon, it isn't clear.
I hope I'll be able to track the writer so I can ask him to simplify comic books just for you, Brarver.

Until then, I think I'll hold your hand and take you through the stages myself:

Panel 1: Part of the moon/volcano erupts.
Panel 2: Thor borrows through the ground
Panel 3: Thor pushes the part of the moon back together, using his physical strength, and looks to be putting as much as an effort as possible.
Panel 4: Lightning is released through the cracks (cauterization, for the lack of a better word)
Panel 5: That part of the moon is now shown completely fine

He did this in a few seconds/minutes? Congratulations. He stills shit himself for a feat that is, while impressive, kiddies league compared to what you're trying to pass it off as.

Pfhew. I know it was a big mental effort keeping up, so after this sentence. take a 10 minute break, ok? Class will be resumed afterwards.

..

Ready? ok.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Though lol at you trying to squirm out of admitting you're wrong by using "celestial bodies". It's worlds. It says worlds right there. And also lol at you saying Thor destroying a planet is arguably his most impressive feat ever.
Initially, I used "celestial bodies" because it implies both planets and moons (which is what he shit himself repairing). But now that I look at it, since the moon was populated, it might aswell be considered a world, too. Not that it matters that much, though 🙂

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Hyperion
Everybody, I'd like us to take a break and notice how Brarver compared the effort Hyperion put in this scene:

vs the one Thor put in this scene:

..or as I'd like to call it, "Hurk!" vs "HHHHHRRRRGGHHH!" 😂
I'd also like to point that one is stopping a speeding planet, while another is shifting a small part of a moon.

Oh, Bran.

All that's left is Yggdrasil.

Now, I hope you don't mind, but I'll take the time with that one, since I also want to post it in mythbusters for 'shit feats' Thor has.

🙂

Originally posted by abhilegend
At that point, World Tree was a nexus. It didn't contain anything in its roots or such.

Yeah, it had power over asgardians and Enchantress made Thor invisible to it. Guess Enchantress is more powerful than everybody else.

I just called it an unquantifiable feat, what's hating in it? But if you really want to compare unquantifiable feats, you're against the wrong character here. Superman and Captain Marvel lifted a book that contained the ****ing multiverse. How much stronger than Thor they are now?

🙄

Originally posted by pym-ftw
earths weight
6.5 sextillion tons
force needed to destroy earth
110 sextillion tons or 110 quadrillion megatons

Nasa & Nato respectively


By the way your figure of 110 quadrillion megatons of force seems to be the prevailing number on many sites. I guess I'll go along with it too.

Now keeping this tidbit in mind, I have no idea why Thor shattering worlds is still being lowballed or dismissed to the point of bringing up faulty logic just to rationalize the feat.

And it's funny how detractors say it's only a striking feat and not really a strength feat. Considering the figures above, pretty faulty logic there. I mean the narration is pretty clear for crying out loud...

"With every swing of his mighty hammer, Thor felt his bones rattle. His fingers crack. HIS MUSCLES TEAR. And yet, he swung again. Even harder than before. And again. And again."

He was shattering a celestial body completely as a side effect of his assault on Gorr. The retarded part is Aaron went even further. His bludgeoning of Gorr caused a far away celestial body to shatter. Now going back to the above numbers, it's ridiculous to even calculate the amount of force his blows were generating. Wrap your mind around that! Thank god for those Asgardian arms!

"and he thundered on... THE SHATTERING OF WORLDS AROUND HIM... focused only on bludgeoning... and ignored... everything... else... "

And for shiets and giggles, why even bother when Thor has already laughed off "the weight of half a planet"? Notice he throws Mjolnir at a speed faster than light. 😱

Pretty hypocritical of you since you keep dismissing Superman's feats regarding the same planet shattering "six times" and wondering why everybody else is dismissing it as a strength feat?

Originally posted by abhilegend
If he can produce shockwaves that destroys the world alongside another superman, he can destroy a planet by one punch. It isn't a hyperbole, it happened everytime they strike ech other and it was explicitly stated to be their punches that destroyed the world.

Here he does it by himself in one punch.

"Who can strike with such force they shatter-". It happened again and again. It happened 6 times in 3 comics, how many of them are hyperboles?

Honestly, if any other character destroys a planet 6 times in 3 comics with another slightly stronger version of himself in combat by just shockwaves anytime soon, his fans would nuke every comic book vs forum on internet.

Even after the writer confirmed it?

You thorbags make me laugh. And half the planet? Pfft, here is Superman taking the full gravity of entire planet.

Again, at nigh powerless state.

http://i1113.photobucket.com/albums/k508/abhilegend/Superman/000023.jpg
http://i1113.photobucket.com/albums/k508/abhilegend/Superman/000024.jpg
http://i1113.photobucket.com/albums/k508/abhilegend/Superman/000025.jpg

herbwank

Originally posted by abhilegend
Pretty hypocritical of you since you keep dismissing Superman's feats regarding the same planet shattering "six times" and wondering why everybody else is dismissing it as a strength feat?

Even after the writer confirmed it?


Still at this? With your track record of misrepresenting feats, I shouln't really be surprised.

Originally posted by abhilegend

You thorbags make me laugh. And half the planet? Pfft, here is Superman taking the full gravity of entire planet.

Again, at nigh powerless state.

http://i1113.photobucket.com/albums/k508/abhilegend/Superman/000023.jpg
http://i1113.photobucket.com/albums/k508/abhilegend/Superman/000024.jpg
http://i1113.photobucket.com/albums/k508/abhilegend/Superman/000025.jpg

herbwank


What's your point in showing this?

Originally posted by Philosophía
My guidelines? Bran, do you even remember your argument, why you brought up Thor being able to destroy planets? It was because you tried to make a point about how he and Superman have basically equivalent strength feats [Superman bench-pressing Earth and Thor being capable of destroying it], and thus any of them could conceivably replicate the other's feat. I'll even quote you on it:
The problem is that you were [b]wrong
. The Beta Ray Bill feat you brought up implies a shitload of other factors besides strength, like: trans-light momentum bullrushing of a celestial body alongside another fighter in an energy engulfed 'projectile.

That does not even belong in the same world as Superman bench-pressing the Earth. In that situation, velocity and durability is much more important than pure strength. Beta Ray Bill's feat [and by proxy, Thor's] doesn't imply the strength necessary to bench-press a planet, no matter how hard you'd want it, in order for him and Superman to be in the same class.

In other words, your argument is non-existent, in this case. You have none.[/B]

Yes your guidelines. And I know what I said, and unlike you, I am still sticking to what I stated then. It's just that with your eyes closed approach to what you'll respond to you must have missed... 3/4's of it.

However, this is separate from the prior statements I said in your quote. Since as I stated before... in my last post exactly, that the Beta example was brought up purely because you stated Thor can't destroy the Earth. Which you tried to completely squirm out of with every fiber of your being. It couldn't simply be because you're wrong, no, it's because Beta can destroy Earth or a planet, but only if it follows what you make up, and are continuing to.
Like I said, quote:

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
And yet you continue to argue about it like you have a case. I don't care if he used speed. You outright stated twice Thor can't destroy planets in two separate posts. I brought up additional proof of Thor being able to, then you just acted like it didn't count because it didn't follow "Phildo's Guide to Anything That Isn't Superman".
Let's do a play by play of this event:
"Thor can't destroy Earth"
*Thor and Beta destroying a planet*
"Well he destroyed a planet... but he didn't do it in this way!"

Which is completely not the point. Beta was brought up to backup Thor destroying a planet. Nothing more nothing less. Though I like how you're selecting pieces of my post while ignoring the vast majority of it just so you can repeat yourself like you have a point. How about you quote this:

Which is hilarious that you actually ignored this.

But to reiterate because you're apparently blinded by hate, the Beta example is not being used in a way that you quoted in my initial post. Beta was simply to combat your stupidity of saying Thor can't destroy a planet. Like I stated over and over and over again.

Thor destroying a planet however is proof my quoted post you flocked to. It's separate instances. Unlike you, I'm actually trying to cover all topics, and just because you think gleefully ignoring things that actually cover the topics is proof of the opposition having no point, that doesn't mean I strayed off path.

Although if I was Phildo, I would have simply ignored that entire section and just pretended something like this existed:

Originally posted by Philosophía
The problem is that you were [b]wrong. [/B]

And acted like that's all you said. Because that's how you prove a point to someone. Ignore them actually addressing their point.

Originally posted by Philosophía
Holy shit, Bran, so you're saying that the circled panel here doesn't show him shitting himself with effort, just because there's another scene where he lends off the same scream in another circumstance?

He's with his eyes closed, grinding his teeth and lending a scream as he pushes to get the part of the moon back in place.

According to Bran logic? That's just a standard scream.

You've gone full retard.

From this point on, at least in this thread, I'll be calling you Brarver.

Well, let's follow your guidelines here for shitting oneself:

Here is the "HHHHHRRRRGGHHH!" you yourself use to indicate a different level of struggle from the Hyperion scene:

That was not the finishing blow in a fight that lasted hours. Later Thor would go on to one shot them without the "HHHHHRRRRGGHHH!". Naturally this is the limit of Thor... a "HHHHHRRRRGGHHH!". So it makes no sense that he would kill them with one shot without that, but he would land a "HHHHHRRRRGGHHH!" on one without a kill shot? Perhaps you can answer that.

Here he is eyes closed with seemingly a lot of effort behind it breaking a chain:

Naturally again, this is the limit, or close to the limit of Thor's power. Again, your argument.

Here he is seeming to expend a lot of effort with a hammer swing with lightning behind it that the hand of the Berserker tanks. Also interesting is him gritting his teeth trying to wrestle it.

Naturally again, close to Thor's limit. This is the same Berserker as my earlier scan. Also, him gritting his teeth and wrestling the Berserker ended with him getting tossed back hard in the next panel.

Here he is switching things up with a "RRRRGGGHHH!" and nearly eyes closed hitting Ulik in the face, which as you'll notice, Ulik is still awake.

What's interesting about that one is that his facial structure and use of screams was something that was missing when he was shattering worlds. Which by your logic would make these hammer hits... harder? Well, that doesn't make much sense to me but if you insist I guess we'll go with that.

Now I'm curious if I should include the 50 or so "HHHHHRRRRGGHHH!" in the comics. Though you'll ignore that much like you ignored the jumping "HHHHHRRRRGGHHH!" even though that exactly showed that it was a standard scream.

And what I'm saying is that yes, Thor tried, maybe even really hard, but that in no way means that was the limit of Thor's power. And even if it was the limit of Thor's power, he pushed the moon together immediately. There was no struggle over time. There was no Thor pushing for minutes, or hours. It was just Thor expending effort and pushing the moon back together in seconds.

Now, since at least one of us has to not pretend this hasn't already been answered:

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
However, addressing the actual scream "point". He did the same Goddamned thing flying through the air. OMG, he must have been trying his hardest jumping through the air. How does Thor even walk?
And a scream when you [b]immediately
push a moon together doesn't imply a limit. Especially when he does so before Gorr even reaches him. Because that's what you're using to lowball Thor here, something he did in what seconds?
This is the sequence:

Thor shatters worlds and a nearby moon while fighting Gorr.
Thor disengages Gorr to fly to said moon.
Thor pushes the moon together, and heals it in three panels.
Thor flies off while being worshipped.
Gorr arrives speeding by and cuts of Thor.

But Thor yelled out the same way he did when he jumped through the air like a ****ing cat, so naturally he hit his limit. That's your argument apparently. Naturally you would tell me Superman benching the planet's weight and then only hitting with mountain destroying punches WAS OMG THAT WAS NO WHERE NEAR HIS LIMIT OMG HATERS, OMG I'M GOING TO SPAM THE OWNAGE THREAD FOR LIKE 20 PAGES DEFENDING THIS!
Which is what I find cute about this little red herring here. You're basically inviting people to downplay the planet benching feat in favor of mountain destroying punches. Be my guest though, I don't give a shit.

In case you're still playing dumb, yelling/grunting/screaming doesn't establish a limit... especially when they do it quickly quickly quickly. Maybe if he sat there and struggled for a while you'd have a point, but... he didn't.[/B]

Nice little hissy fit though. I'd say good reading comprehension too, but that's assuming your mind didn't just black out everytime you read something that you couldn't answer.

Originally posted by Philosophía
I hope I'll be able to track the writer so I can ask him to simplify comic books just for you, Brarver.

Until then, I think I'll hold your hand and take you through the stages myself:

Panel 1: Part of the moon/volcano erupts.
Panel 2: Thor borrows through the ground
Panel 3: Thor pushes the part of the moon back together, using his physical strength, and looks to be putting as much as an effort as possible.
Panel 4: Lightning is released through the cracks (cauterization, for the lack of a better word)
Panel 5: That part of the moon is now shown completely fine

He did this in a few seconds/minutes? Congratulations. He stills shit himself for a feat that is, while impressive, kiddies league compared to what you're trying to pass it off as.

Pfhew. I know it was a big mental effort keeping up, so after this sentence. take a 10 minute break, ok? Class will be resumed afterwards.

..

Ready? ok.

There is Thor nearly "shitting his pants" releasing lightning on its own. Lightning that in no way came to welding a moon back together. Couple with pushing said moon together, and it seems perfectly reasonable to assume a combination.

Though your talking down is cute considering you can't even keep up with half the shit I say.

If I were you, I'd just leave this here. Done. That's it, job well done. Let the pillow clean up my tears.

But not all of us are pillow biting retards, so...

I'm not sure how you can actually address the point that he did this in seconds (lol at minutes you threw in) and still maintain that this was the limit to his strength. Keep in mind he you know... did it in seconds. It could have either been a case of too much force expended for the task, or it could have been one of those many times in comics where a being struggles with a feat below his maximum. Or it could have been a combination of lightning and strength, again. Though lol at pushing a moon together in seconds and healing it being the thing to lowball him.

"He could never move a planet because you see he pushed a moon together and healed it in seconds... but he screamed you see!"

****ing retarded.

Though, let's use this same logic for Superman. And let's combine it with your Beta Ray Bill hissy fit.

Dr Veritas. The woman who watched Superman bench a planet for days says Superman isn't holding back at all, and that's not all, but his power level is exceeding previously recorded data.
Who is delivering mountain destroying punches directly into the planet after divebombing H'el from space.
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/Superman/Superman17-007.jpg
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o106/bigbran1/Superman/Superman17-008.jpg

Combined with my sig, I guess Superman can't destroy planets after all. Fact. Actually, all he can do is destroy mountains at best, and that's with extreme speed behind it. Where was your little hissy fit in response to Superman I wonder? Surely this should have went hand in hand with your moon feat of Thor, no?
And considering you think Thor can't bench planets, but you're subtly conceding that he can indeed destroy Earth. Where does that leave us in figuring out which feat is better?

Which was my initial point. Though, I personally have no problem putting them on equal grounds and assume that either feat aren't out of the realm of possibility for either. But again, your logic works in both ways towards Superman and Thor. Yet...

Oh wait, you're just going to ignore this part. My bad.

Though before I leave it at that, Superman's "mountain destroying exceeding previous levels" is much more damning that a Thor yell he did like 30 times prior and at least 20 times since.

You go from defending both parties and assuming both are within bounds in a non bias answer and then some crazed fanboy/hater drags you down to his level. Tsk tsk. But you don't deserve any better I guess.

Originally posted by Philosophía
Initially, I used "celestial bodies" because it implies both planets and moons (which is what he shit himself repairing). But now that I look at it, since the moon was populated, it might aswell be considered a world, too. Not that it matters that much, though 🙂
I like how much you're avoiding this now.

Let's see if we can get a straight answer out of you. I won't use many words because you'll straight up ignore it if I do...

Did Thor shatter worlds in that scene?

Originally posted by Philosophía
Everybody, I'd like us to take a break and notice how Brarver compared the effort Hyperion put in this scene:

vs the one Thor put in this scene:

..or as I'd like to call it, "Hurk!" vs "HHHHHRRRRGGHHH!" 😂
I'd also like to point that one is stopping a speeding planet, while another is shifting a small part of a moon.

Oh, Bran.

There you go with the use of that word again. Let's face it, that's the sole reason for you somehow lowballing that scene. While you unimpressively ignore him screaming the same thing jumping. While you apparently never read any of the actual comics since Thor screamed that at least twice ever issue. But I digress.

Anyway, we have Hyperion "scream" with extreme grimaces stopping the planet. Yet we know for a fact his limit goes up to universal... squared. 🙂

Surprised you're defending Hyperion though considering all the cheese nightmares that character gives you.

Originally posted by Philosophía
All that's left is Yggdrasil.

Now, I hope you don't mind, but I'll take the time with that one, since I also want to post it in mythbusters for 'shit feats' Thor has.

🙂

K see you in 3 months then.

Though I like how you're now calling Thor's feats shit when this little butthurtery of yours started because I was being non partisan between Superman and Thor. Yes, Thor's feats are shit, that'll show me. Keep on getting angry because Thor's feats are brought up to show he's simply not that weak. I guess I threatened Superman too much by defending him or something?

Although I'd look for the scans of Thor breaking through a field crushing him under the weight of a score of planets, and those neutron star scans along with others. But the World Engine is about enough.

Needless to say, Thor has the feats, he just lacks moving an actual planet. Though I guess I forget who I'm talking to. Cry first never ask questions later is the strategy.

WOW! Not holding back and all he can muster is mountain busting punches??? Well, we now know what a " unrestrained all-out superman can do. 😮‍💨

Now look what happened with your lowballing of Thor Phildo. Side effects

My apologies to the non featfish real Superman fans.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Still at this? With your track record of misrepresenting feats, I shouln't really be surprised.
What did I misrepresent now, o wise thorbag? If you don't have eyes, I will do it for you.

All of them saying the same thing which was confirmed by the writer. So why don't you cut the crap and tell me what am I misrepresenting?

What's your point in showing this?
Just for teh lulz.

Originally posted by JBL
WOW! Not holding back and all he can muster is mountain busting punches??? Well, we now know what a " unrestrained all-out superman can do. 😮‍💨

Nothing wrong with that. All out Thor's strikes are merely a tapping on real mountains.

vin

Getting to the point where I think only Bran and Philo should be posting in this thread, because the rest of you (Abhi, Celeg, JBL) can't seem to just debate any way remotely properly.

Either get your shit together guys, or Bada's going to be giving people vacations.

I don't know what else to say. I'm posting scans which says directly that "world shatters" constantly and yet I'm somehow twisting scans without telling me what exactly I'm twisting. I even put up writer's word on it and Celey still can't accept it. What else am I supposed to do?

srug

Originally posted by abhilegend
I don't know what else to say. I'm posting scans which says directly that "world shatters" constantly and yet I'm somehow twisting scans without telling me what exactly I'm twisting. I even put up writer's word on it and Celey still can't accept it. What else am I supposed to do?

srug

Ask DC to republish the comic with a world shattering and the Spectre appearing to confirm Superman shattered worlds with his fists. Make sure they draw a world shattering on pannel and some waver going from Kal's fist to the world.

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
The retarded part is Aaron went even further.

Nah, the retarded part is Aaron completely raping physics by having the shockwaves from their blows somehow travel through the vacuum of space and shattering nearby planets.

Guess Hulk and Superman aren't the only characters who can warp reality with their strength, huh.

Originally posted by Bentley
Ask DC to republish the comic with a world shattering and the Spectre appearing to confirm Superman shattered worlds with his fists. Make sure they draw a world shattering on pannel and some waver going from Kal's fist to the world.

Celey would still not accept it. Like he claimed this was not a planet destroying feat.

http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/16763867/actioncomics770p25.jpg.html

Despite explicitly stated by Mxy that Joker was shrinking the universe in a point of infinite gravity.

http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/16763917/actioncomics770p22-1.jpg.html

Honestly, that should be so much better that Superman could move in that high gravity and still destroy a planet. But no, its still not good enough for Celey.

😬

Originally posted by -Pr-
Getting to the point where I think only Bran and Philo should be posting in this thread, because the rest of you (Abhi, Celeg, JBL) can't seem to just debate any way remotely properly.

Either get your shit together guys, or Bada's going to be giving people vacations.

Hey I'm not the one constantly bringing up Superman feats that have no bearing on the argument. I'm also refraining from constant name calling(ie. Thorbag).

Originally posted by abhilegend
What did I misrepresent now, o wise thorbag? If you don't have eyes, I will do it for you.

All of them saying the same thing which was confirmed by the writer. So why don't you cut the crap and tell me what am I misrepresenting?

Just for teh lulz.


You keep bringing up this feat, but you should know by now I'm not going to waste my time on that.

For all of you folks interested, this is what happened the last time. Like I said many times, it's a great feat, but not what Abhi is making it out to be. Follow the hilarity that ensues from page 36 on..

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=520290&pagenumber=36

Originally posted by Epicurus
Nah, the retarded part is Aaron completely raping physics by having the shockwaves from their blows somehow travel through the vacuum of space and shattering nearby planets.

Guess Hulk and Superman aren't the only characters who can warp reality with their strength, huh.


Hush you. 😛

There were debris and gas particles that were jettisoned from the planet's surface which in turn helped conduct the shockwaves way beyond it's atmosphere! And there could have been nebulous gasses that may have helped precipitate the transfer of energy as well. Perfectly plausible for comic science.
😛

Originally posted by abhilegend
Celey would still not accept it. Like he claimed this was not a planet destroying feat.

http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/16763867/actioncomics770p25.jpg.html

Despite explicitly stated by Mxy that Joker was shrinking the universe in a point of infinite gravity.

http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/16763917/actioncomics770p22-1.jpg.html

Honestly, that should be so much better that Superman could move in that high gravity and still destroy a planet. But no, its still not good enough for Celey.

😬