Originally posted by quanchi112
I said he will come across as superior in the film.
How can Hulk possibly com across as superior when they are having him fight a depowered Thor?
Even if Hulk wins, it literally means nothing. If it's a stalemate though (or even a near stalemate), then full powered Thor comes across as far superior.
Originally posted by Darth ThorDepowered Thor was in the first film. Do you believe he fights Hulk at those power levels ?
How can Hulk possibly com across as superior when they are having him fight a depowered Thor?Even if Hulk wins, it literally means nothing. If it's a stalemate though (or even a near stalemate), then full powered Thor comes across as far superior.
See, here we go you already said it means nothing proving facts don't matter. You're biased. Facts matter not your imagination. They already fought with his hammer. Did Thor win ? Nah, but I heard all kinds of excuses. This is Thor's film if he loses I'm going to be such a prick over this. I'll never drop it.
Originally posted by quanchi112
When did I claim that ? I said he will look superior in this film throughout. You then begged me to change my opinion without accepting a bet. You believe Thor is more durable and the powerhouse between the two. Prepare to be mocked this November.
When I asked you "Yes or no" in regards to Hulk decisively defeating Thor, you dodged.
If Hulk does end up winning, this post will be here, so don't think about going "told you so, I knew Hulk would defeat Thor" to people. Because as of today, you don't have the confidence he will.
#noconfidenceinhulk
Originally posted by playa1258
I'm going with Hulk.
^
See, this guy has confidence in Hulk decisively defeating Thor
Originally posted by Darth ThorAgain that is a skip Bayless argument saying if this play would have been caught and then changing the outcome. Superman lost. Facts don't change you have to accept them however unlikely they were. Batman won. Undeniable and fanboys want to make excuses for it since they don't believe it should be even close.
Just being cautious. If Superman was more cautious (for instance), he wouldn't have got hit by a Kryptonite bomb when up against Batman.
Originally posted by Darth Thor
How can Hulk possibly com across as superior when they are having him fight a depowered Thor?Even if Hulk wins, it literally means nothing. If it's a stalemate though (or even a near stalemate), then full powered Thor comes across as far superior.
Isn't it interesting how he's calling you biased based on his belief that facts don't matter to you, even though he's been arguing that it doesn't matter that Thor has better feats for pages?
Originally posted by RobtardI said he will look superior in the film. Hulk will look superior in Thor's own film. I said superior so of course I'll be right. You'll be dead wrong since you claimed stalemate and that Thor is more durable, powerful, and skilled. You'll look like an idiot.
When I asked you "Yes or no" in regards to Hulk decisively defeating Thor, you dodged.If Hulk does end up winning, this post will be here, so don't think about going "told you so, I knew Hulk would defeat Thor" to people. Because as of today, you don't have the confidence he will.
#noconfidenceinhulk
^
See, this guy has confidence in Hulk decisively defeating Thor
#noconfidenceinThor
Originally posted by quanchi112
Depowered Thor was in the first film. Do you believe he fights Hulk at those power levels ?See, here we go you already said it means nothing proving facts don't matter. You're biased. Facts matter not your imagination. They already fought with his hammer. Did Thor win ? Nah, but I heard all kinds of excuses. This is Thor's film if he loses I'm going to be such a prick over this. I'll never drop it.
Thor has no Mjolnir and no Lightning or Weather powers (presumably). If that's how it is, then yeah obviously it won't mean nothing.
It would be like Sidious beating Yoda on a massive dark side nexus. Or Wonder Woman beating Superman right after he's been hit by Kryptonite. Or Spock beating Khan after Uhura's shot him 4 times.
Meaningless wins against clearly disadvantaged people.
It's only an opportunity for the disadvantaged to look good. Nothing more.
Originally posted by Silent MasterFeats matter but that isn't proof Hulk couldn't survive it. Direct comparisons matter more. Listen to me, h1.
Isn't it interesting how he's calling you biased based on his belief that facts don't matter to you, even though he's been arguing that it doesn't matter that Thor has better feats for pages?
Originally posted by Darth ThorHe was depowered in part one so do you agree he will have his strength and power ? He might not have his hammer but if you believe he is a powerhouse why does he need it ? He's already more skilled. So you believe his lightning powers won't be available or that if he doesn't use them you'll cry foul.
Thor has no Mjolnir and no Lightning or Weather powers (presumably). If that's how it is, then yeah obviously it won't mean nothing.It would be like Sidious beating Yoda on a massive dark side nexus. Or Wonder Woman beating Superman right after he's been hit by Kryptonite.
Or Spock beating Khan after Uhura's shot him 4 times.
Meaningless wins against clearly disadvantaged people.
It's only an opportunity for the disadvantaged to look good. Nothing more.
No, that isn't the same thing at all.
Uhura shot him eight times and he was winning one on one. So you believe if Hulk wins and no one jumps in it the same as someone else shooting Khan in the back ? Seriously.
So you believe the powerhouse loses if he doesn't have his hammer ? So you think he needs his hammer against the Hulk and without it he stands no chance. Interesting.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I said he will look superior in the film. Hulk will look superior in Thor's own film. I said superior so of course I'll be right. You'll be dead wrong since you claimed stalemate and that Thor is more durable, powerful, and skilled. You'll look like an idiot.#noconfidenceinThor
Looking superior doesn't automatically equate to winning the fight. You won't say you think Hulk will decisively win, it's telling you have no confidence in the green guy. These post will be here when the time comes.
Originally posted by RobtardIt also falls in line with that happening as well. If Hulk wins that falls under the he looks superior. If you want to make a bet with me I'm more than willing. If you want to be spineless then just walk away. I'll remind you I gave you the chance.
Looking superior doesn't automatically equate to winning the fight. You won't say you think Hulk will decisively win, it's telling you have no confidence in the green guy. These post will be here when the time comes.
I said Hulk will look superior you don't think there will be a winner at all. You don't believe in Thor as looking superior at all. I'll be there to rub it in to the Thor trolls such as yourself who believe he's the powerhouse of the two. 🙂
You have zero faith in Thor but just want to troll.
Originally posted by RobtardI said I'll bet you on it. You don't even think Thor will look superior at all. You have no faith in him. So this exposes your false stance on his feats, etc.
Bet on what? You won't outright say that you believe Hulk will decisively defeat Thor. You dodge and everyone can see it.I'm thinking virtual stalemate. That means confidence in both these powerhouses.
I believe Hulk is the powerhouse but when push comes to shove you believe they are equal thus sinking your own argument.
Game. Set. Match.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I said I'll bet you on it. You don't even think Thor will look superior at all. You have no faith in him. So this exposes your false stance on his feats, etc.I believe Hulk is the powerhouse but when push comes to shove you believe they are equal thus sinking your own argument.
Game. Set. Match.
Just to be clear, you're betting Hulk will decisively pull a win over Thor? Yes?
I don't believe they're equal, non gimped Thor going all out would win, imo. He has a array of powers.