Thor: Ragnarok

Started by ShadowFyre74 pages

Y'all are sad.say anything you can to make the hulk look better in your eyes. Thor has the better feats and was whooping Hulks ass. Let it go

Originally posted by Robtard
Thor tanking the Bifrost and Sokovia explosions say otherwise. Those are film facts.
Horrendous logic. That's saying hulk couldn't survive those situations. In direct comparison Hulk has fared better ergo he's more durable.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Y'all are sad.say anything you can to make the hulk look better in your eyes. Thor has the better feats and was whooping Hulks ass. Let it go
Hulk is portrayed superior between the two in terms of physicality. Quinjet also agrees. Let it go you snowflake.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Hulk is portrayed superior between the two in terms of physicality. Quinjet also agrees. Let it go you snowflake.

You do realise physicality includes speed and manoeuvrability right? It’s anything a combatant can do “physically”.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
You do realise physicality includes speed and manoeuvrability right? It’s anything a combatant can do “physically”.
What area do you think Thor has the physical advantage in.

Originally posted by quanchi112
What area do you think Thor has the physical advantage in.

Superior in Speed, maneuverability. On par with durablity.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Horrendous logic. That's saying hulk couldn't survive those situations. In direct comparison Hulk has fared better ergo he's more durable.

Using film feats is never "horrendous logic", sorry. You're just saying that because those feats shit all over Hulk's feats.

I didn't say Hulk would or wouldn't, I said from what we've seen in multiple films now is that Thor has the superior durability feats; this is just a fact.

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Y'all are sad.say anything you can to make the hulk look better in your eyes. Thor has the better feats and was whooping Hulks ass. Let it go

Agreed.

Originally posted by Darth Thor
Superior in Speed, maneuverability. On par with durablity.
Thor is the smaller guy and has better skill/training but Hulk is the physical specimen. He's just raw but we see how fast Hulk can be in a raw type manner. He's a monster whereas Thor is the far more technical of the two.

Originally posted by Robtard
Using film feats is never "horrendous logic", sorry. You're just saying that because those feats shit all over Hulk's feats.

I didn't say Hulk would or wouldn't, I said from what we've seen in multiple films now is that Thor has the superior durability feats; this is just a fact.

When we have examples of how the two stack up in the same universe and you want to ignore those examples and use exclusive feats as the tell all indicator it isn't being objective and you know it.

We judge them based off how they stack up in similar situations. Hulk is the physical specimen here it isn't Thor. Thor is the technical and battle tested warrior who has skill and lightning based powers. Those are his pros whereas physicality is all the Hulk.

I think both characters came away looking good in the fight. Obviously they didn't let us see who would win if the fight kept going but it CERTAINLY was implied that Thor was going to win. We'll never know. Thor using his powers was essentially supposed to represent him fighting with Mjolnir. When he started using those powers he was easily getting the upper hand. Then Grandmaster robbed us all of the results because he was worried Hulk would lose.

Again; both characters looked good in that fight and that's a pretty good accomplishment by the director in my opinion.

Just saw this finally. I liked it. Hela was powerful as all get out. Thor/Hulk fight was nice but short. I dug the mace Thor was using. Reminded me of Hercules' mace. The Valkyrie that died protecting the movie Valkyrie during the Hela fight was blonde and looked just like Brunnhilde to me. The Skurge tribute to the comics was great. All in all it was a damn fun movie.

8/10

Originally posted by ShadowFyre
Y'all are sad.say anything you can to make the hulk look better in your eyes. Thor has the better feats and was whooping Hulks ass. Let it go

👆

Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
Grandmaster had two years to watch the Hulk fight and get an idea of his prowess. Yet, despite that, he still felt the need to intervene on Hulk's behalf during the fight with Thor. And no amount of mental backflips can change that.

1000000000000000000% agreed...

Grandmaster saw that Hulk was about to lose and cheated...

Atleast that was my view of things...

This is easily the best movie of the year

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
1000000000000000000% agreed...

Grandmaster saw that Hulk was about to lose and cheated...

Atleast that was my view of things...

He simply didn't want to risk it because he's a corrupt man. His opinion is just that. Thor didn't win.

Thor didnt win but Hulk didnt either....It was 2v1

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Thor didnt win but Hulk didnt either....It was 2v1
Hulk was not sore either. He looked superior physically whereas Thor had the skill edge which I said years ago.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Hulk was not sore either. He looked superior physically whereas Thor had the skill edge which I said years ago.

So you agree that it was 2v1...

Afterall Hulk had help...Thor didnt.

🙂

Originally posted by CPT Space Bomb
Thor didnt win but Hulk didnt either....It was 2v1

👆