Originally posted by Kalen Sykes
I am honestly shocked that this debate is still going on, but whatever.
I felt that this debate is important, to address misconceptions and confusion about the subject event. If I am missing something, of-course, I can be notified as well. Purpose of a debate is to reach an understanding on a matter based on available information, if possible. People are interpreting the ground realities of subject event in their own ways due to lack of clear explanation of the event at official capacity. I will try to contact authors of BioWare to provide full picture of the subject event for the readers, if it becomes necessary.
Originally posted by Kalen Sykes
1) The purpose of the ritual was not to create a dark side nexus, but to help Vitiate achieve corporeal immortality, as you have mentioned a number of times.
This is a matter of interpretation.
You may check this:
"He invited them to participate in a ritual to unlock the full potential of the dark side; he promised they would unleash power beyond anything they had ever witnessed or imagined."
"Didn't they suspect a trap?"
"Perhaps." Nyriss shrugged. "Some refused to answer his call. But many more came. After all, what could one man do against a hundred Sith Lords? Remember, he was not the Emperor back then. He was merely Lord Vitiate, ruler of a single planet of no particular importance. He hadn't fought in any battles of note or achieved any great victories or conquests beyond his homeworld. He had the reputation of a scholar, not a warrior. And the Sith Lords were driven by fear. Many thought the Jedi would soon wipe them all out. They were desperate for anything they could use as a weapon against the servants of the light side. Lord Vitiate played upon these fears, convincing those who answered his call to set aside their suspicions of him and of one another to join in a single glorious cause." (Star Wars: The Old Republic: Revan)
As you may notice, the purpose of the ritual was to achieve something that could be used against the Jedi or so the visiting Sith Lords were led to believe. It is no where stated that they performed the ritual to grant Emperor Vitiate corporeal immortality (only), they would like to benefit from it as well. Interestingly, some suspected that this was nonsense or a trap and did not participate, 8000 didn't.
Originally posted by Kalen Sykes
2) The darkside nexus was created as a result of the ritual. Again, I thought this had been decided, by now.
Once again, a matter of interpretation.
The ritual led to creation of the largest nexus of the dark side ever, so it is possible that this was the objective or part of the objective. Keep in mind that Force-users decide what they intend to perform and achieve with a ritual. There is not a single example which suggests that performing a ritual leads to creation of a nexus of the dark side or light side as a byproduct like it happened in the Nathema event. The participants most likely willingly created the largest nexus of the dark side ever during this ritual.
Originally posted by Kalen Sykes
3) The desolation of the planet was a byproduct of the ritual and not something Vitiate actively did. You can't tap into that much darkside energy and expect some kind of massive fallout.
3 statements reveal that Emperor Vitiate performed this deed on his own accord, ignoring them makes your interpretation credible? I don't think so.
No where it has been stated that the participating Sith Lords intended to drain each other to death or that they wanted to fuel the power of Emperor Vitiate (only). If this was the case, telepathic subjugation would not have been performed by Emperor Vitiate initially before pulling the Force Drain card.
If we are to assume that participating Sith Lords willingly allowed Emperor Vitiate to fuel his power by draining them, then should we also assume that they were all willing to die for the greater glory of Emperor Vitiate, really? This is really stupid assumption. Sith Lords are not suicidal and neither 8000 would gather somewhere to commit suicide so that one individual would benefit from it.
Think.
Originally posted by Kalen Sykes
You're right, this isn't the appropriate thread, but since you made the statement, I'm going to answer it. Vitiate is powerful, very powerful. He is easily in the top 3 Sith of all time, but the Ones are in a higher tier than anyone else. That's just how it is.
I am not responding to this, I have opened an appropriate thread for this. Use it.
Originally posted by Kalen Sykes
And btw, regarding your "dismissal" of Ant, I read what he posted and at no point was he insulting, rude, or condescending. He simply asked you to stop pushing the Nathema ritual discussion in that particular thread, because the argument was becoming circular and nothing was being achieved from it. He even pointed out that he accepted the fact you wouldn't change your mind, based on the information we provided, but other posters were complaining to him about it. At no point did he ban you from the thread, insult you, or even dismiss your opinion as irrelevant. In fact, he suggested you continue the discussion in a different thread, something you've suggested if a thread has gone off topic.
That thread involved Sith Emperor, his actions and accomplishments would be expected to be discussed. He didn't like this, some others didn't like either. He should have just pointed out to be me to discuss Nathema event separately so that a meaningful understanding could be achieved from it in another thread. But he singled me out from others for insulting matter (even though some insulted me outright) and restricted my right to have a debate on that thread.
When you announce something, you do not single someone out for ridicule and impose restrictions on him among all in a "debating" forum with exception to trolls. This sends the wrong signal to the singled-out person. You make an announcement impartially like "Alright people, shift the discussion of Nathema to a different thread and reach an understanding on this matter over there. Once that happens, provide me details." When Moderators make an announcement, they do it impartially and for everybody. They do not make a habit of singling people out, unless they are not good Moderators. This is a matter of common sense. Even if his intentions were good, he handled the matter very poorly.
You know? He have been among those members whom I have personally respected. It is not like that I had something personal against him. He made the matter personal in his own thread and I also believe that others are to share the blame for motivating him to target me.
Originally posted by Kalen Sykes
Instead, you make a point to publicly criticize him in your thread, something I personally felt was unneeded and unwarranted, culminating in you ignoring him. What you do is your business, but in the past, you've called other posters children, which implies you've been acting like the adult of the debate. Perhaps, on this, you should act like an adult and just let it go?*Oh, and LeGenD, this isn't an attack on you, just some constructive criticism.*
Ok, look, I admit that I often get carried away but I still remain sensible or not try to escalate things too much. I know that some have insulted me first many times and I responded in kind. I do not have an habit to start spoiling discussions by insulting others out of nowhere. So instead of pointing fingers at me only, try to understand my position as well.