The Official TnA Thread

Started by dadudemon11 pages

Also, I would like to add that at the heart of fighting sexism is the notion that one sex does not consider the feelings of the other.

When a women gets dressed (or undressed) to look super sexy and posses for a camera, her explicit feelings is for others to view her as sexy. By refusing to indulge her feelings with a false sense of "self-righteousness", you fail to take her feelings into consideration and in fact, become sexist. I am not even kidding. This seems like "crazy talk" because we have been bombarded but idiotic feminist ideals for decades so we are conditioned to not think objectively (hah, almost pun) about these subjects. But let me explain this a different way...*

This same logic applies, equally, to a woman who is photographed, for sexual reasons, WITHOUT her consent. Viewing that content is sexist to the max. You did not consider her feelings when viewing the content: she probably doesn't want you to view them.

*This does not mean you have to view every last picture, ever, of any person who posses sexy for a camera. This just means not to balk and scorn at women who choose to do these things. This also means not to balk and scorn at other people who view these things for pleasure or admiration.

Edit - Holy shit. I sound like a feminist. An actual feminist. How dare I actually take into account a person's feelings and demand equality for both sexes. Who the hell am I? 🙂

Originally posted by Bardock42
Your general lack of understanding of the dynamics of oppression is frustrating. However I do not feel up to the task to educate you, and honestly think you would probably not be open to input currently anyways.

You are correct that it would be a waste of your time as I view your position as the ignorant and an indoctrinated one, not mine.

I used to think the same way you do. But I have been able to shed the shackles of ignorance and propaganda from the shitty feminist machine. I have been able to supplant those former ideals with objective and logical ideals regarding the sexes to obtain a superior and more true perspective of egalitarianism (you know...actual feminism...not this bullshit sexist "feminism" disguised as egalitarianism).

I view some your positions on sexuality and the sexes as archaic and unwarranted self-righteousness. Some of your positions are part of the problem and why we continue to deal with sexism, today.

I should also note that some of your positions on sexism are modern, logical, and applaud-able. Not every position you hold falls under the umbrella of negative remarks I have made.

Originally posted by Bardock42
This reduces women to their body parts. which are then stylised for male pleasure. It adds to the general demeaning and discrimination of women. Hence sexism.
There are bisexual and lesbian females that appreciate the female form, particularly their body parts.

For argument's sake, does stylising the male sex organ or body form count as sexism too?

Because for centuries the male form has been stylised and appreciated as far back as the ancient greeks!

Originally posted by It's xyz!
There are bisexual and lesbian females that appreciate the female form, particularly their body parts.

For argument's sake, does stylising the male sex organ or body form count as sexism too?

Because for centuries the male form has been stylised and appreciated as far back as the ancient greeks!


I'm a bisexual female and while I do appreciate the female form, I do not reduce women to just "titties and asses".
Hence my dislike of the thread.

👆

Originally posted by Kharhmah
I'm a bisexual female and while I do appreciate the female form, I do not reduce women to just "titties and asses".
Hence my dislike of the thread.
Hmm, I remember a lesbian friend of mine that would drool over a woman with big curves and even chase them.

But ofcourse, I don't think she would reduce females to their body parts alone.

Originally posted by Kharhmah
I'm a bisexual female

Pics or it didn't happen 🙂

Originally posted by dadudemon

Thanks for getting the thread back in track

Bardock make your own thread

Originally posted by Robtard
Pics or it didn't happen 🙂

Somehow I dont think a picture can prove my bisexuality. Unless of course I write "bisexual" on my forehead, that is.

Originally posted by maxivitopowe
Thanks for getting the thread back in track

Bardock make your own thread

I don't feel like I particularly derailed this thread. I still find it gross though, and may choose to air that grievance.

Originally posted by Kharhmah
Somehow I dont think a picture can prove my bisexuality. Unless of course I write "bisexual" on my forehead, that is.

Nah.

If you posted a picture of yourself having sexy times with a woman (and no money, goods, or services were involved), according to the Kinsey Institute, that would generally prove you are bisexual.

That is the evidence Robtard is looking for and I think you knew that already so I'll shutup.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I don't feel like I particularly derailed this thread. I still find it gross though, and may choose to air that grievance.

No way...being off-topic in the off-topic forum? Well, I never...

Originally posted by dadudemon
Nah.

If you posted a picture of yourself having sexy times with a woman (and no money, goods, or services were involved), according to the Kinsey Institute, that would generally prove you are bisexual.

That is the evidence Robtard is looking for and I think you knew that already so I'll shutup.

Well, a woman and a man, and knowing of Rob's predisposition, it's mostly the man he's looking for.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, a woman and a man, and knowing of Rob's predisposition, it's mostly the man he's looking for.

😆

She's already posted pictures of her being together with a boyfriend so she's got the man part covered (ha...that sounds perverted).

Originally posted by dadudemon
Nah.

If you posted a picture of yourself having sexy times with a woman (and no money, goods, or services were involved), according to the Kinsey Institute, that would generally prove you are bisexual.

That is the evidence Robtard is looking for and I think you knew that already so I'll shutup.


Techhhnically it wouldn't though, just because I may post a picture of myself and another woman doesn't necessarily mean I'm bisexual. js.

Guys, guys, guys, it was humor. In no way do I doubt that Kharhmah likes both 'oysters and snails' as the saying goes.

The better question, is it an equal like/love?

Originally posted by Kharhmah
Techhhnically it wouldn't though, just because I may post a picture of myself and another woman doesn't necessarily mean I'm bisexual. js.

That's not how the Kinsey institute considers it. Sexual experiences with the same sex (when prostitution of any sort, including porn, is not involved) constitutes homosexuality. Both sexes? Bisexuality.

They put sexuality on a sliding scale with pretty much everyone being differing degrees of bisexual.

Originally posted by Robtard
The better question, is it an equal like/love?

She has stated, in the past, that it wasn't 50-50 and that she had a preference for males. But that may have been on another forum/chat.

there were supposed to be lots of pics in this thread