Underworld vs. Priest vs. Blade vs. I, Frankenstein

Originally posted by quanchi112
You can pretend all you want and try to spin this. You're too stupid to even seeing it coming. Too dupe anyone to have their own words clearly own yourself was truly awesome.

I always new the UW vampires aren't anything similar to the vampires of modern day film. I wanted to post a link so I copied it word for word. They are immortals who aren't undead, sport.

You made the claim but you already destroyed your own logic by living beings sans a soul.

You're so painfully pathetic I will continue to crush you and remind you in this thread.

Incorrect and look how angry you're getting. Lets me know you know you're incorrect.

You googled and gleaned info and in your haste to "trap", you failed to realize I had already countered.

Incorrect. You're claiming they have souls. It's for you to prove. You've been dodging ever since.

Originally posted by Robtard
Hell, prove UW-verse people have souls to begin with. Prove it or concede.

Originally posted by Robtard
Why would they have souls? Spiritually isn't part of every franchise.

that really is reaching bro.
on page 2 you said that the gargoyles can inhabit the dead and anything without a soul.
you then went on to say that vampires are dead. you were definitely implying that they can be inhabited BECAUSE they were dead.

now it's been proven that they aren't dead.

you're a good debater and seem like a good guy. I'd hate for you to lose credibility by going in circles like this out of spite for quan.

we're all wrong sometimes. it's best just to admit it

Originally posted by Raisen
that really is reaching bro.
on page 2 you said that the gargoyles can inhabit the dead and anything without a soul.
you then went on to say that vampires are dead. you were definitely implying that they can be inhabited BECAUSE they were dead.

now it's been proven that they aren't dead.

you're a good debater and seem like a good guy. I'd hate for you to lose credibility by going in circles like this out of spite for quan.

we're all wrong sometimes. it's best just to admit it

Why is it reaching? Every character that is living has a soul in every universe? Frankenstein in this film is living and didn't.

I said they can inhabit corpses and Frankenstein's monster (living beings without souls). Which is correct.

I was wrong in saying they were undead but I also noted that UW-verse people may not have souls to begin and asked for proof. Ergo, the basis of quanchi's "trap" is already busted.

I do hope he does put this into his profile as he claimed, he's making a shrine to me. I find it flattering and hilarious he's that obsessed with me.

Originally posted by Robtard
Why is it reaching? Every character that is living has a soul in every universe? Frankenstein in this film is living and didn't.

I said they can inhabit corpses and Frankenstein's monster (living beings without souls). Which is correct.

I was wrong in saying they were undead but I also noted that UW-verse people may not have souls to begin.

you seemed like you were back tracking when you said that.
once your point was nullified then you back tracked.

I'm not going to keep going back and forth bro. and I know you don't care, but I don't believe you.

you're a good debater and seem like a good person. I definitely wouldn't want to give quan a win against me cuz I know he would use it against me until the end of time.

but right is right.

Originally posted by Robtard
Incorrect and look how angry you're getting. Lets me know you know you're incorrect.

You googled and gleaned info and in your haste to "trap", you failed to realize I had already countered.

Incorrect. You're claiming they have souls. It's for you to prove. You've been dodging ever since.

You were flat out wrong and should have goggled info. Instead you inserted your foot into your own mouth and have been wildly flailing your claims from this to that.

You claimed the tactic would work so the onus is on you. It didn't even work on a living being who developed a soul.

😂

Originally posted by Raisen
you seemed like you were back tracking when you said that.
once your point was nullified then you back tracked.

I'm not going to keep going back and forth bro. and I know you don't care, but I don't believe you.

you're a good debater and seem like a good person. I definitely wouldn't want to give quan a win against me cuz I know he would use it against me until the end of time.

but right is right.

How did I back track by quoting what I had already stated as my stance from the start?

Okay then.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I am laughing at you. You fell for it and are so clueless about the UW to believe they are dead.

You were flat out wrong and should have goggled info. Instead you inserted your foot into your own mouth and have been wildly flailing your claims from this to that.

You claimed the tactic would work so the onus is on you. It didn't even work on a living being who developed a soul.

😂

Already covered in the beginning of the debate:

Originally posted by Robtard
Hell, prove UW-verse people have souls to begin with. Prove it or concede.

Go on and prove it. Dodging means you concede.

Originally posted by Robtard
Already covered in the beginning of the debate:

Go on and prove it.

😂

You destroyed your own case. I'm better than you.

#rightisright

is there any mention of souls in underworld at all? how can we find this out without having to watch the damn movie again and listen to every word?

Originally posted by quanchi112
You said living beings have souls. Now you pretend you didn't say it.

😂

You destroyed your own case. I'm better than you.

#rightisright

please don't hash tag my saying.

you've never paid any respect in the khan respect thread; and you claimed I was a pretender.

right is right. i'm supporting what you said because you were right, and I just have integrity like that. it doesn't mean we're going to shower together in the locker room after a game of kick ball

Originally posted by quanchi112
You said living beings have souls. Now you pretend you didn't say it.

😂

You destroyed your own case. I'm better than you.

#rightisright

¿Quote me here where I said this? Go on.

As I had to explain to you that Frankenstein was a living being without a soul, it seems you're lying again.

Originally posted by Robtard
¿Quote me here where I said this? Go on.

As I had to explain to you that Frankenstein was a living being without a soul, it seems you're lying again.

Quit ignoring I, Frankenstein lore.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Due to him not being born and being truly unique. All of the characters from Underworld were clearly born by a woman not created in a lab. Even beings created in a lab can develop souls so you ignore that as well.

Quit ignoring I, Frankenstein lore.

¿So where's that quote where you claimed I said something I didn't? 😂 Dodging

That doesn't prove that UW-verse people have souls. It supports that living beings can not have souls.

Originally posted by Robtard
Hell, prove UW-verse people have souls to begin with. Prove it or concede.

Go on and prove it or concede.

Originally posted by Raisen
please don't hash tag my saying.

you've never paid any respect in the khan respect thread; and you claimed I was a pretender.

right is right. i'm supporting what you said because you were right, and I just have integrity like that. it doesn't mean we're going to shower together in the locker room after a game of kick ball

I don't need to share Khan with unbelievers.

Just rub it in. Robbie is a very poor debater who doesn't cite evidence and fanboys it up all the time unlike myself.

#Robbieiswrong

oh god. the circles being ran remind me of arguments with ex girlfriends.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I can hashtag whatever I want.

I don't need to share Khan with unbelievers.

Just rub it in. Robbie is a very poor debater who doesn't cite evidence and fanboys it up all the time unlike myself.

#Robbieiswrong

I'm not going to rub it in. dude, I supported your stance because i believe you were right.
you don't have to be a rude to everybody.

When quan starts claiming that I said something and then dodges when he's asked to provide proof in the form of a quote. That should tell you something.

Originally posted by Robtard
When quan starts claiming that I said something and then dodges when he's asked to provide proof in the form of a quote. That should tell you something.

I read what you said. you definitely implied it.

please tell me how to put two quotes into one message and i'll show you why I think the way I do

Originally posted by Robtard
Yeah, you didn't pay attention and are wrong again. They can only possess bodies without souls, ie dead bodies and Frankenstein's monster. This was a key plot of the film.

Sit back and learn how to debate. I got this one, kickballkid.

Originally posted by Robtard
¿So where's that quote where you claimed I said something I didn't? 😂 Dodging

That doesn't prove that UW-verse people have souls. It supports that living beings can not have souls.

Go on and prove it or concede.

You made the claim they possess their bodies so the onus is on you.

You already stumbled all over yourself and walked into my trap.

Keep going though. Your pride must sting right now. Oh wait you don't have any.