At the end of the day a major factor is the amount of screens each cinema complex has.
Major blockbusters can have up to 4 screens showing the same feature...then you have the sessions broken into 2D & 3D screenings.
No theatre complex is going to show just 2 features (Cap3 & Supes/Bat) on all their screens for x amount of weeks.
Originally posted by -Pr-I just posted a link. I didn't write the story, brah.
I don't think it's nearly as sure a thing as cap is, and I think it's relying more on it's own quality than cap is by a far extent.you couldn't be any more transparent if you were made of glass.
Dc buckled, brah.
Originally posted by RobtardI do not hate dc I just prefer marvel. I see why you resonate so much with dc being such a coward yourself and all.
I'm not a silly "I love one franchise so I have to hate the other" guy like you. I like both, so even if that were true, it would be irrelevant to me. /denied
#Sandorrocks
Originally posted by quanchi112
I just posted a link. I didn't write the story, brah.Dc buckled, brah.
I do not hate dc I just prefer marvel. I see why you resonate so much with dc being such a coward yourself and all.
#Sandorrocks
you wrote the title of the thread, brah.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Says the guy ashamed of himself. Irony.Dc buckled and everyone knows it. The dc fanboys say otherwise. Cap pushed both batman and superman around showing weakness.
lol, you can lie as much as you like, it doesn't make it true.
Originally posted by quanchi112
They did buckle under the pressure. We all waited to see which company would change and it wasn't mighty marvel. Two dc icons look weak to just Cap.
We'll see in 2016 which film makes more money. Cap has a chance if B V S sucks, and Cap 3 rocks.
But really B V S doesn't want to compete with Cap. It (ideally) wants Avengers type business.
But a film like Cap could take B V S down a couple hundred million. And vice versa. And whilst Marvel could afford the hit with just one of it's big properties- Cap. WB can not afford to take a hit on B V S, as it's their potential biggest hit to date and is going to kick off their Shared Cinematic Universe.
Put simply B V S is far more important to WB than CAP 3 is to Marvel.
Originally posted by juggerman
"They buckled and are cowards""They are just being smart"
I honestly don't care either way, I'm just happy I get to see it sooner!!!
Lol same here! 👆
Originally posted by DARTH POWERThe two icons should clearly make more money than cap 3. That is what is so funny with dc backing down from their powerhouse movie to cap 3.
We'll see in 2016 which film makes more money. Cap has a chance if B V S sucks, and Cap 3 rocks.But really B V S doesn't want to compete with Cap. It (ideally) wants Avengers type business.
But a film like Cap could take B V S down a couple hundred million. And vice versa. And whilst Marvel could afford the hit with just one of it's big properties- Cap. WB can not afford to take a hit on B V S, as it's their potential biggest hit to date and is going to kick off their Shared Cinematic Universe.
Put simply B V S is far more important to WB than CAP 3 is to Marvel.
Lol same here! 👆
Dc looked weak up against marvel in the same release date. Hilariously weak.
Originally posted by quanchi112
They did buckle under the pressure. We all waited to see which company would change and it wasn't mighty marvel. Two dc icons look weak to just Cap.
Except that it isn't just Cap. It's tied in to the Avengers and the Marvel shared universe. If Cap 3 bombs, Marvel won't take a hard hit.
WB has far more to lose if this movie bombs than Marvel/Disney does with Cap.
Should they have gone against Cap and the MCU in the first place? No, as they aren't direct competition right now, and are well behind in developing their universe. They were right to move, and I'm sure WB will have trouble consoling themselves with all the extra money they'll be making now that they're unopposed.
Originally posted by quanchi112
The two icons should clearly make more money than cap 3. That is what is so funny with dc backing down from their powerhouse movie to cap 3.Dc looked weak up against marvel in the same release date. Hilariously weak.
Not at all.
If you could get over your hate, you'd see that.
Originally posted by -Pr-It is just cap. It isn't an avengers film and just because marvel has built an on screen empire don't hold their success against them.
Except that it isn't just Cap. It's tied in to the Avengers and the Marvel shared universe. If Cap 3 bombs, Marvel won't take a hard hit.WB has far more to lose if this movie bombs than Marvel/Disney does with Cap.
Should they have gone against Cap and the MCU in the first place? No, as they aren't direct competition right now, and are well behind in developing their universe. They were right to move, and I'm sure WB will have trouble consoling themselves with all the extra money they'll be making now that they're unopposed.
Not at all.
If you could get over your hate, you'd see that.
I agree dc has more to lose and fault it to poor planning and shitty execution.
Dc backed down whether you want to admit it or not. We all waited and dc buckled first.
Hatred makes me strong.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It is just cap. It isn't an avengers film and just because marvel has built an on screen empire don't hold their success against them.I agree dc has more to lose and fault it to poor planning and shitty execution.
Dc backed down whether you want to admit it or not. We all waited and dc buckled first.
Hatred makes me strong.
It isn't just Cap though; it's part of a franchise. A franchise that backs it up.
They get a date wrong and suddenly they plan badly and execute badly. Don't be silly.
Changing a date, which is a smart move, to make more money... Yes, those silly, silly people.
Not a word I'd use.
Originally posted by -Pr-Not every dc character comes along with Batman and Superman but in this case a lot of heroes are being established. This is a film which features two icons against one marvel hero in one outing and they back down.
It isn't just Cap though; it's part of a franchise. A franchise that backs it up.They get a date wrong and suddenly they plan badly and execute badly. Don't be silly.
Changing a date, which is a smart move, to make more money... Yes, those silly, silly people.
Not a word I'd use.
Who had the date first ?
Originally posted by Rao Kal ElWho had the date first ?
Lol @ the picThe thread is still retarded though, IMO.
Business decisions are based on money, this is no exception as much as you will like to troll dc fans.
I am happy with the superhero movies so far, something that was lacking on previous decades
Batman and Superman is a sure thing and if Cap originally had the date and they moved it onto the same date as Cap and then changed it they just made themselves look like bigger jackasses.
Originally posted by Rao Kal ElDc first set the stage for the battle. Huge blunder on their end because lots of different sources feel they backed down after the GOTG success.
It was perfectly explained on the video.From a business point of view is a good move, since DC is on an uphill battle.
It makes perfect sense if you want to maximize profits.
Don't pick a fight you can't finish. They set up the date as the same weekend marvel originally slotted Cap three for then backed down showing trepidation.
Once again, the Marvel brand has asserted its dominance over DC. Warner Bros. just announed that the highly anticipated Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice has been moved. The film will no longer go head to head with Marvel's Captain America 3 on May 6, 2016. Instead, the former will open March 25, way ahead of the summer rush.
The March release date will give Batman v Superman plenty of breathing room at the box office. When Warner Bros. first staked its claim on May 6, it seemed adamant about not budging. Perhaps Guardians of the Galaxy's stellar performance last weekend reiterated that even Marvel's lesser-known properties can bring in the big bucks. They're a studio that shouldn't be taken lightly.
Not my words yet another sources.