Nam-Ek and Ronan Vs Hulk and Thor

Started by wallman779 pages
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Since when is breaking glass a huge destructive force, in any movie? Its just shock value added to make the scene cool. They broke glass ok, Carver threw hissy fits about this because they did it in the matrix. Ok people they broke glass. And?

my friend the glass is a bonus. it shattered the CONCRETE ALL AROUND THEM fFOR YARDS AND EVEN SHOOK THE CARS.

Originally posted by carver9
They didn't touch the glass to break it and the distance they are from the building and the shockwaves reaching so far makes it even more impressive.

Glad we have confirmed glass was broken.

Originally posted by wallman77
my friend the glass is a bonus. it shattered the CONCRETE ALL AROUND THEM fFOR YARDS AND EVEN SHOOK THE CARS.

How are you trying to connect this as a superior feat to Namek, Namek tossed a entire train through the air and cratered it, Zod collapsed a sky scraper with just his heat vision. I fail to see relevance as collateral damage is in both movies of people fighting. Marvel shoots movies different then DC, do you want both movies to be the exact same, have the same type of CG and action and fight scenes?

Originally posted by carver9
They didn't touch the glass to break it and the distance they are from the building and the shockwaves reaching so far makes it even more impressive.
👆 Yeah. I'm surprised it was never brought up before. I remember mentioning it a few times when the movie was in theaters, but I guess people didn't care/know about it because there was no footage.

I guess if it doesn't explicitly triumph another feat it doesn't get brought up.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
How are you trying to connect this as a superior feat to Namek, Namek tossed a entire train through the air and cratered it, Zod collapsed a sky scraper with just his heat vision. I fail to see relevance as collateral damage is in both movies of people fighting. Marvel shoots movies different then DC, do you want both movies to be the exact same, have the same type of CG and action and fight scenes?

LOL what are u talking about dude. I remembered something from the movie. I looked it up and found that thor has a great strength feat often over looked. a feat that is comparable to the "god feat" of the great and feared kryptonians. it was merely to show that thor is no slouch in punching power and that he can give off blows comparable and in this case stronger than them since their haymakers didn't destroy the ground they were standing on. that's it. and it has relevance in the thread because we were discussing the helmets and some said thor or hulk cant break it. im putting my two cents in the other jar.

that's it...I dunno what ur talking about. dc and marvel cg and fight scenes lol. u got so ahead of me its not even funny. nam's other feats weren't in question. nor was collateral damage. so I dunno where that came from lol. look im sayin thor has enough strength to bang the big boys(ever nut hugged kryptonians) of KMC. that's it lol

Originally posted by Zack Fair
I guess if it doesn't explicitly triumph another feat it doesn't get brought up.

you see it

Striking power, not punching power.

By the looks of it the hammer did most of the damage.

But yeah I agree. That is why I don't see how people think Namek will solo this.

Originally posted by wallman77
LOL what are u talking about dude. I remembered something from the movie. I looked it up and found that thor has a great strength feat often over looked. a feat that is comparable to "god feat" of the great and feared kryptonians. it was merely to show that thor is no slouch in punching power and that he can give off blows comparable and in this case stronger than them. that's it. and it has relevance in the thread because we were discussing the helmets and some said thor or hulk cant break it. im putting my two cents in the other jar.

that's it...I dunno what ur talking about. dc and marvel cg and fight scenes lol. u got so ahead of me its not even funny. nam's other feats weren't in question. nor was collateral damage. so I dunno where that came from lol. look im sayin thor has enough strength to bang the big boys(ever nut hugged kryptonians) of KMC. that's it lol

Fair enough

Originally posted by Zack Fair
Striking power, not punching power.

By the looks of it the hammer did most of the damage.

But yeah I agree. That is why I don't see how people think Namek will solo this.

I stand corrected 😮

Originally posted by Zack Fair
Striking power, not punching power.

By the looks of it the hammer did most of the damage.

But yeah I agree. That is why I don't see how people think Namek will solo this.

I base on him being able to block things like as Mal did that and follow it with serious damage. Namek was an absolute beast.

again maybe one on one, but with the hulk, the fight becomes something totally different. and thor will get a few hits in.

Ronan is the weak link. Give Namek someone like Abomination or something.

yup

Originally posted by wallman77
again maybe one on one, but with the hulk, the fight becomes something totally different. and thor will get a few hits in.

Ok but Thor stalemated Hulk while he was supposedly holding back. Namek never held back and took down Clark every time. Though it didn't kill him it was stalemated based on durability.

hmmmm

Took down Clark everytime? Man what are you smoking?

lol

Originally posted by FrothByte
Took down Clark everytime? Man what are you smoking?

Go watch the movie, you will see Namek got the last hit in.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Go watch the movie, you will see Namek got the last hit in.

Getting the last hit in isn't equivalent to him "taking Clark down everytime" especially considering that he had Faora's help most of the time.