Originally posted by Time Immemorial
How are you trying to connect this as a superior feat to Namek, Namek tossed a entire train through the air and cratered it, Zod collapsed a sky scraper with just his heat vision. I fail to see relevance as collateral damage is in both movies of people fighting. Marvel shoots movies different then DC, do you want both movies to be the exact same, have the same type of CG and action and fight scenes?
LOL what are u talking about dude. I remembered something from the movie. I looked it up and found that thor has a great strength feat often over looked. a feat that is comparable to the "god feat" of the great and feared kryptonians. it was merely to show that thor is no slouch in punching power and that he can give off blows comparable and in this case stronger than them since their haymakers didn't destroy the ground they were standing on. that's it. and it has relevance in the thread because we were discussing the helmets and some said thor or hulk cant break it. im putting my two cents in the other jar.
that's it...I dunno what ur talking about. dc and marvel cg and fight scenes lol. u got so ahead of me its not even funny. nam's other feats weren't in question. nor was collateral damage. so I dunno where that came from lol. look im sayin thor has enough strength to bang the big boys(ever nut hugged kryptonians) of KMC. that's it lol