god is something that made you what you are gave you many options to choose... gave you endless wonders to learn and explore..
god is something you will never understand because of our selfish minds...ppl feel the need to say we need to see or understand god to believe he is real... thats where the faults of man begin
Originally posted by ShakyamunisonHere's another part in which conventional philosophy goes against instinct, our crucial common "God-given" inner sense.
Put the ego away. You have to climb the mountain before you can be on top.
Your ego adds novel perspective to the collective, it doesn't take away.
You're not going to get as far with a "I'll try" as you will with an "I will".
Know that I'm not all about "I may be"; I'm all about "I will be, *****. Don't like? Suck on dez nutZ"
Originally posted by Oneness
Here's another part in which conventional philosophy goes against instinct, our crucial common "God-given" inner sense.Your ego adds novel perspective to the collective, it doesn't take away.
You're not going to get as far with a "I'll try" as you will with an "I will".
Know that I'm not all about "I may be"; I'm all about "I [b]will
be, *****. Don't like? Suck on dez nutZ" [/B]
There is a difference between believing you can climb the mountain, and climbing the mountain. Until you have climbed the mountain, you will not know the difference.
Originally posted by ShakyamunisonBe that as it may, the certainty that I can do it will ensure that it is done.
There is a difference between believing you can climb the mountain, and climbing the mountain. Until you have climbed the mountain, you will not know the difference.
"Commit your work to the Lord, and you plans shall be established." -proverbs 16:3
If you'd test my aforementioned prerogative (believing you not only have control over your circumstance, but your desired circumstance is the circumstance you were created to be in), as opposed to not testing anything and letting the resulting chaotic experience (the things that happen to you when you take no stance and make no action) shape your beliefs, you'd find that I'm correct in this matter.
That goes for all of you. You're not the victim.
Originally posted by Oneness
If you'd test my aforementioned prerogative (believing you not only have control over your circumstance, but your desired circumstance is the circumstance you were created to be in), as opposed to not testing anything and letting the resulting chaotic experience (the things that happen to you when you take no stance and make no action) shape your beliefs, you'd find that I'm correct in this matter.That goes for all of you. You're not the victim.
But you don't know enough. You didn't even know that Newtonian Physics and Quantum Mechanics are incomparable. I don't have to test your idea. Until you gain more knowledge, there is nothing to test.
Originally posted by ShakyamunisonNewtonian Physics=/=Physics in general. You're the one who couldn't make that distinction, lol.
But you don't know enough. You didn't even know that Newtonian Physics and Quantum Mechanics are incomparable. I don't have to test your idea. Until you gain more knowledge, there is nothing to test.
I have tested the philosophy instilled not in philosophical works, but observed through the observation of others.
Originally posted by Oneness
Newtonian Physics=/=Physics in general. You're the one who couldn't make that distinction, lol.I have tested the prerogative instilled not in philosophical works, but observed through the observation of others.
What are you talking about?
Here is a test:
Is the cosmological constant part of?
A: Newtonian Physics
B: Quantum Mechanics
Name the theory and the theories author where the cosmological constant can be found.
What part of the theory of Relativity did Einstein call his biggest mistake?
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
What are you talking about?Here is a test:
Is the cosmological constant part of?
A: Newtonian Physics
B: Quantum Mechanics
You're still not getting it, physics is all-encompassing, theories are an ever-evolving part of it.
Name the theory and the theories author where the cosmological constant can be found.I never said I wanted to know everything or that having trivia knowledge for the sake of having trivia knowledge aids one in an argument that doesn't really have a whole lot to do with superfluous details.What part of the theory of Relativity did Einstein call his biggest mistake?
When you come across a non-superfluous detail that proves that QM isn't a theory in Physics, come back.
Originally posted by Oneness
You're still not getting it, physics is all-encompassing, theories are an ever-evolving part of it.I never said I wanted to know everything or that having trivia knowledge for the sake of having trivia knowledge aids one in an argument that doesn't really have a whole lot to do with superfluous details.
When you come across a non-superfluous detail that proves that QM isn't a theory in Physics, come back.
You don't know enough. There is no way that someone with your lack of knowledge could make any contribution to how the universe is put together.
Originally posted by ShakyamunisonMy thesis was that under a different law of thermodynamics (one based on QM) the Super Being the OP was abstracting could very well exist.
You don't have a thesis.
And that, according to QM, there's no cosmological constant.
So if thermodynamics permits such a life-form, it might not matter because it could all be wrong.
Originally posted by Oneness
My thesis was that under a different law of thermodynamics (one based on QM) the Super Being the OP was abstracting could very well exist.And that, according to QM, there's no cosmological constant.
So if thermodynamics permits such a life-form, it might not matter because it could all be wrong.
However, the cosmological constant is not compatible with Quantum Mechanics. Quantum Mechanics doesn't say anything about the cosmological constant. It would be like saying:
And that, according to QM, there's no right shoe.
Quantum Mechanics doesn't have anything to say about shoes (left or right), just like it has nothing to say about the cosmological constant. That is just one reason you do not have a thesis.
Originally posted by ShakyamunisonI never said that it did. But there has to be patterns emerging from systemic evolution, even if they’re chaotic.
However, the cosmological constant is not comypatible with Quantum Mechanics. Quantum Mechanics doesn't say anything about the cosmological constant. It would be like saying:And that, according to QM, there's no right shoe.
Quantum Mechanics doesn't have anything to say about shoes (left or right), just like it has nothing to say about the cosmological constant. That is just one reason you do not have a thesis.
Our understanding is simply in its infancy, but some of us, or at least one human, a special case, is deductive enough to contemplate the fullest implications and what they ultimately lead to.
That order is emergent, choice-driven, and not natural, all-encompassing, or neccesary.
The order comes from the advanced, but it also comes from the conscious.
Originally posted by Oneness
I never said that it did.
Originally posted by Oneness
…And that, according to QM, there's no cosmological constant...
Originally posted by Oneness
But there has to be patterns emerging from systemic evolution, even if they’re chaotic.
Originally posted by Oneness
…I never said I wanted to know everything or that having trivia knowledge for the sake of having trivia knowledge aids one in an argument that doesn't really have a whole lot to do with superfluous details…
Originally posted by Oneness
…Our understanding is simply in its infancy, but some of us, or at least one human, a special case, is deductive enough to contemplate the fullest implications and what they ultimately lead to.
Originally posted by Oneness
…That order is emergent, choice-driven, and not natural, all-encompassing, or neccesary.
The order comes from the advanced, but it also comes from the conscious.