ISIS Terrorists Behead American Journalist

Started by Shakyamunison8 pages

The world would be better off with Saddam Hussein still in power. He was the guy who paid the families of suicide bombers, and killed his own people with WMD that he reportedly didn't have.

And of course we didn't find any of the WMD that we gave him. That would have been embarrassing.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
See how hate twists everything. It's no use talking to you about it. You have been brainwashed. Enjoy the hate.

The hell. Hate?

What was I wrong about? Did you look up the US/Iraq SOFA as I said.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
The world would be better off with Saddam Hussein still in power. He was the guy who paid the families of suicide bombers, and killed his own people with WMD that he reportedly didn't have.

Do you think Iraq and her people are better off right now than in 2003/pre US invasion?

The official stance of the US government is that Saddam did not have the WMDs that the Bush cabinet claimed and that was the sole reason for the invasion. If you don't recall, it went something like this:

Bush: "Saddam, you need to turn over your WMDs."
Hussein: "But I don't have any, UN inspectors verified this."
Bush: "I'm warning you, turn over your WMDs or else."
Hussein: "What the hell, bro. I don't have any. France, Germany, Russia and others are even saying you're wrong here."
Bush: "I warned you, now you and your sons have 48hrs to leave Iraq."
Hussein: "Dude, we don't have any WMDs and I'm not leaving my own home."
Bush: "You were warned, buddy! You tried to kill my dad!"

*Iraq invasion commences*
*Zero WMDs found*

I won't say they're better off, but Saddam was a horrific dictator and needed to be ousted. But it was a rodent-like tactic to lie to the public to incite the war, and further use 9/11, which had nothing whatsoever to do with Iraq or Saddam, to fuel anti-Arabic sentiment so people would enlist.

I find it ironic that in using the excuse of "The War on Terror" to incite America to oust the Saddam regime, they may have benefited the terrorists even more than before, as in ousting Saddam, they allowed al-Zarqawi's Iraqi Al-Qaeda branch to form due to the governmental collapse, which in turned morphed into the ISIS terrorist regime we see today, and now, with American patriotism exhausted and cynical due to being wasted on the the Iraq war, sending in troops to help isn't even an option.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
See how hate twists everything. It's no use talking to you about it. You have been brainwashed. Enjoy the hate.

Says the guy who watches Fox News.

Oh the irony.

Originally posted by Robtard
Do you think Iraq and her people are better off right now than in 2003/pre US invasion?

The official stance of the US government is that Saddam did not have the WMDs that the Bush cabinet claimed and that was the sole reason for the invasion. If you don't recall, it went something like this:

Bush: "Saddam, you need to turn over your WMDs."
Hussein: "But I don't have any, UN inspectors verified this."
Bush: "I'm warning you, turn over your WMDs or else."
Hussein: "What the hell, bro. I don't have any. France, Germany, Russia and others are even saying you're wrong here."
Bush: "I warned you, now you and your sons have 48hrs to leave Iraq."
Hussein: "Dude, we don't have any WMDs and I'm not leaving my own home."
Bush: "You were warned, buddy! You tried to kill my dad!"

*Iraq invasion commences*


It's no use Robtard.

The conservative Republicans will keep denying Bush's responsibility for the invasion of Iraq, and shift the blame to the current Democratic president.
As is expected from the Republicans.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
The world would be better off with Saddam Hussein still in power. He was the guy who paid the families of suicide bombers, and killed his own people with WMD that he reportedly didn't have.

WTF?

I don't know from which planet you came from, but this has to be one of the most minformed posts I have ever read in this forum.
This can't be further from the truth.

Originally posted by AsbestosFlaygon
Says the guy who watches Fox News.

Oh the irony...

You must really HATE Fox News. Good job being a tool for the Democrats.

Lol

Fox News is a blatant GOP propaganda machine. Just tuned in a second ago and tonight they're going to have a 1 hour story on Benghazi (aka slandering Obama's foreign affairs cabinet and administration).

The other day they were discussing Obama's "no strategy" comment (which they of course took out of context with the TTLY objective headline "Obama administration admits it lacks strategy"😉 and whereas CNN and MSNBC were conversing with foreign affairs officials and military and governmental personnel, and geopolitical strategists and analysts, Fox was conversing with reliable analyst Stacey Dash of Clueless fame 😆

The Onion is more a more reliable and objective news source than Fox (and Glen Beck/ Rush Limbaugh) at this point.

To be fair, Stacey Dash was sexy in her Clueless days.

Even sexier in her Illegal In Blue days 🙂

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Well you are pretty smart, why don't you run for office or something and fix something. There are smart people here, someone should step up.

I am not a US citizen nor a US resident, so that's not possible. As far as smart people rising up to change things, Obama was exactly that sort of person. Granted, he didn't live upto all of his promises but that's the way politicians role in any part of the world.

Obama's doing the best job he can do at this point. There are a lot of outside factors and circumstances plaguing Obama that would be disadvantageous to anybody put in the same position. He is trying to help but not trying to overstep his bounds and become Iraq's personal bodyguard. You criticize him for his patience, Time Immemorial, yet you pose no effective solutions to his complex problems. He is not a genie and being POTUS does not make you an autocrat. He is only human and must be pragmatic with the circumstances that are occurring in Iraq and Ukraine, neither one of which are due to his actions.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
See how hate twists everything. It's no use talking to you about it. You have been brainwashed. Enjoy the hate.
I got what you meant.

You asserted that the hateful people in which TM would have been addressing, will never agree with him regardless of how valid his point is because hate distorts logic.

These Reps are riding the high horse, thinkin they'd make the better solutions when in fact their leaders where the ones responsible for this mess in the first place.

Bush's invasion of Iraq was what sparked the formation of ISIS, directly or indirectly.

Furthermore, and this was her main point I believe, was that you shouldn't attempt to win opponents over with your argument - because no one in power should be considered opposed to each-other, because we should all be about protecting our country.

Now; TM, forgive Shakyam's naivity and trust in the goverment - she's completely unaware of politicians in the Legislative Branch. Too many have the their fingers deep in the federal reserve bank which can opt to encrypt and transfer any funds, free from unwanted eyes, through the Department of Treasury.

Originally posted by Oneness
Too many have the their fingers deep in the federal reserve bank which can opt to encrypt and transfer any funds, free from unwanted eyes, through the Department of Treasury.

And you know this happens exactly like this how?

Originally posted by Robtard
And you know this happens exactly like this how?
Persuasive YouTube videos.

Originally posted by Robtard
And you know this happens exactly like this how?
Compelling arguments.

Compelling as I find that exactly the kind of thing that'd be going on given the weakness of a capitalist's ideal upper-class-based system + legislative decision>liberty of the people + the executive & judicial systems.

So recently the Syrian Government began to finally attack ISIS with airstrikes.

Unfortunately all they've managed to hit have been civilians waiting for bread.