RGJ
is it ok to screw animals?
i'm not asking cause i want to screw animals (promise). i was just thinking... what is the reason it's not ok to screw animals again? i have heard that it is wrong because sex requires consent.. but that only applies to humans. sex with a doll for example doesn't require consent. so if sex with animals requires consent then you are extending human rights to animals. in which case we probably shouldn't be slaughtering them cause we like the way they taste, or doing experiments on them that we think it would be unethical to do to humans.
the way i look at it either animals' lives aren't worth that much so we do what we please with them or they are worthy of rights in which case we are way out of line with how we currently treat them across the board. i'm having trouble finding the middle ground where slaughtering them is fine, keeping them in captivity for entertainment is fine, injecting them with shit to see what happens is fine, but screwing them is over the line.
another possible objection i thought of is maybe we consider exploitation of animals ok depending on the objective. so we consider food (farming), sport (hunting, rodeos, etc), science (experimentation), and education (zoos and shit) to be worthy causes for animal exploitation. but exploiting them for sex is wrong for whatever reason. as for what that reason is i'm not quite sure.
thoughts?
SAM
Re: is it ok to screw animals?
Yes, because that is the answer you're looking for. 😛
OV
Omega Vision
Face Flowed Into Her Eyes
Re: is it ok to screw animals?
Certain animals are more capable than others of making the choice to have sex with a human. Dolphins for instance will often aggressively initiate an encounter.
In this case the only thing "wrong" about it is the danger to the human partner given the dolphin's size and strength.
In most cases though having sex with an animal is similar to having sex with a mentally disabled person--it often requires 'assuming' consent or taking consent for granted which is all kinds of wrong.
RGJ
Re: Re: is it ok to screw animals?
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Certain animals are more capable than others of making the choice to have sex with a human. Dolphins for instance will often aggressively initiate an encounter.In this case the only thing "wrong" about it is the danger to the human partner given the dolphin's size and strength.
In most cases though having sex with an animal is similar to having sex with a mentally disabled person--it often requires 'assuming' consent or taking consent for granted which is all kinds of wrong.
why do you need the animal's consent though? why does the animal have a right not to be molested but not a right not to be slaughtered/worked/captured/etc.
NEM
Re: Re: is it ok to screw animals?
Originally posted by Omega Vision
In most cases though having sex with an animal is similar to having sex with a mentally disabled person--it often requires 'assuming' consent or taking consent for granted which is all kinds of wrong.
lol
I don't personally care about the consent of animals at all. They're not human beings, why should I? So morally, I can't really get too upset about a guy ****ing his sheep or a girl being mounted by her dog.
I'd still advise against it because almost every animal is a carrier for diseases and infections that can be fatal to humans.
SHA
Shakyamunison
Nam Myoho Renge Kyo
Re: is it ok to screw animals?
Originally posted by red g jacks
i'm not asking cause i want to screw animals (promise). i was just thinking... what is the reason it's not ok to screw animals again? i have heard that it is wrong because sex requires consent.. but that only applies to humans. sex with a doll for example doesn't require consent. so if sex with animals requires consent then you are extending human rights to animals. in which case we probably shouldn't be slaughtering them cause we like the way they taste, or doing experiments on them that we think it would be unethical to do to humans.the way i look at it either animals' lives aren't worth that much so we do what we please with them or they are worthy of rights in which case we are way out of line with how we currently treat them across the board. i'm having trouble finding the middle ground where slaughtering them is fine, keeping them in captivity for entertainment is fine, injecting them with shit to see what happens is fine, but screwing them is over the line.
another possible objection i thought of is maybe we consider exploitation of animals ok depending on the objective. so we consider food (farming), sport (hunting, rodeos, etc), science (experimentation), and education (zoos and shit) to be worthy causes for animal exploitation. but exploiting them for sex is wrong for whatever reason. as for what that reason is i'm not quite sure.
thoughts?
We shouldn't be treating animals the way we do.