is it ok to screw animals?

Originally posted by Epicurus
Forced, and surrounded by a bright red flush of embarrassment at getting owned by me all over again, Supra. Yes, that describes your so-called "smile" perfectly.👆

I wish you knew the truth, sadly you amuse yourself with made up lies about the unknown, Epidural. 💃

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
I wish you knew the truth, sadly you amuse yourself with made up lies about the unknown, Epidural. 💃

Originally posted by Epicurus
Like what, Supra? Humor me.

You seem to think you have upset me, when quiet the contrary, you make me laugh. You seen to hate, I'm just here to have fun, Epidural. 😆

Originally posted by Epicurus
You might as well claim that no sex act should be done since the likelihood of harm and abuse exists in sexual intercourse. Heck, even natural intercourse within a species(like cats) is extremely painful that it borders on what humans would label as abuse.

Which opponents? If you're talking about PETA-lite people, then forget it.

I don't think that's a good argument. Opposition to sex with animals (even on the grounds of it being animal abuse) does not mean one has to oppose sex between human beings.

tbh it seems to me that most people are against bestiality, not only members of PETA

Originally posted by Bardock42
I don't think that's a good argument. Opposition to sex with animals (even on the grounds of it being animal abuse) does not mean one has to oppose sex between human beings.

tbh it seems to me that most people are against bestiality, not only members of PETA

He lost his good arguing sense when Ush banned him and gave him a final warning, ever since then, he's a shell of his former raging self. 😆

Originally posted by Bardock42
I don't think that's a good argument. Opposition to sex with animals (even on the grounds of it being animal abuse) does not mean one has to oppose sex between human beings.

tbh it seems to me that most people are against bestiality, not only members of PETA

Animals are far less at risk than humans are when they mate.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
You seem to think you have upset me, when quiet the contrary, you make me laugh. You seen to hate, I'm just here to have fun, Epidural. 😆

Originally posted by Epicurus
I don't think I've upset you, I know that I have upset you. Fundamental difference between the 2 terms, Supra.

See there is where you are wrong, Epidural 😆

Supra you came into this thread and began bashing Epicurus first. It's obvious you have a vendetta against him.

Originally posted by Bardock42
I don't think that's a good argument. Opposition to sex with animals (even on the grounds of it being animal abuse) does not mean one has to oppose sex between human beings.

Originally posted by Bardock42
tbh it seems to me that most people are against bestiality, not only members of PETA

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
See there is where you are wrong, Epidural 😆

Originally posted by NemeBro
Supra you came into this thread and began bashing Epicurus first. It's obvious you have a vendetta against him.

Oh right, but when he comes into other threads and bashes, thats different.

Originally posted by Epicurus
Incorrect, Supra.

Correct. I'm bored, its hot out and its Sunday. You can't make me mad when I'm laughing at you're experiences with screwing animals, Epidural. 😈

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Oh right, but when he comes into other threads and bashes, thats different.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Correct. I'm bored, its hot out and its Sunday. You can't make me mad when I'm laughing at you're experiences with screwing animals, Epidural. 😈

Originally posted by Epicurus
So far, you're the one who's been following me into every thread and penning down bait posts filled with racial slurs, Supra. It would only be fair game for me to respond in kind.👆

Racial slurs? Proof?

Originally posted by Epicurus
Your butthurt says otherwise. You aren't fooling anyone here, Supra.13

Haha, please. Try and make me mad, Epidural

Originally posted by red g jacks
i'm not asking cause i want to screw animals (promise). i was just thinking... what is the reason it's not ok to screw animals again? i have heard that it is wrong because sex requires consent.. but that only applies to humans. sex with a doll for example doesn't require consent. so if sex with animals requires consent then you are extending human rights to animals. in which case we probably shouldn't be slaughtering them cause we like the way they taste, or doing experiments on them that we think it would be unethical to do to humans.

the way i look at it either animals' lives aren't worth that much so we do what we please with them or they are worthy of rights in which case we are way out of line with how we currently treat them across the board. i'm having trouble finding the middle ground where slaughtering them is fine, keeping them in captivity for entertainment is fine, injecting them with shit to see what happens is fine, but screwing them is over the line.

another possible objection i thought of is maybe we consider exploitation of animals ok depending on the objective. so we consider food (farming), sport (hunting, rodeos, etc), science (experimentation), and education (zoos and shit) to be worthy causes for animal exploitation. but exploiting them for sex is wrong for whatever reason. as for what that reason is i'm not quite sure.

thoughts?

😘 I think I'm gonna throw up.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Oh right, but when he comes into other threads and bashes, thats different.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Racial slurs? Proof?

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Haha, please. Try and make me mad, Epidural