OWAW Superman and HP DD vs. Thanos and PG Thor

Started by Philosophía9 pages

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Because Drax being relevant to Thor with the PG and Drax getting KOed by Thor diminishing Thor's use is a lot dumber.
You think using Drax with the power gem being hurt as a counter-argument to 'Thor is invincible with the power gem', however faulty than line of reasoning is, is dumber than actually saying Thor is invincible with the power gem?

Jesus, Bran.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Never said I wasn't a fanboy. I'm just saying I don't go around with ulterior motives every thread like some people.
😂

Oh, the 'superior' fanboy, who is pure and innocent.

You're not fooling anyone here, Bran. There's very few posters here who can't see you're trying to pass off as the 'knowledgeable, fair' Thanos/Thor fan, when you're anything but.

Sidenote for others, that you probably don't know:
For anybody who's been on herochat, does he remind you of Shruku Demon [a Thor fanboy] trying to be the 'balanced' Superman fan - until he got exposed and ran off the board by Jelly?

Anyway..

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Lol battle zones. Even if the thought appealed I don't have a decent time frame to do it. Plus the guy challenging shouldn't run and hide for a month or so after he debates the challenged in non time frame threads. It'd carry more weight on the "coward" implication anyway.
You don't have the 'time'? Just post the same things you'd post in the normal thread - but with judges and limited posts counts. You're here, are you not?

That way, we won't have an 'attrition war' - because, as it's been blatantly obvious, you have time and patience to write long winded posts [hell, didn't you a few weeks ago go for pages on end with horrific walls of text on a shitty topic?] that would make even Mr. Master's .docx arguments blush.

I don't. I'm sorry to say - but I spend very few time here as it is, and I don't intend to do so by seeing 'who has the last word' and replying to your walls of text and argument stretching.

Any one of those topics I'm game with judges and limited posts.

Originally posted by Prof. T.C McAbe
Brainiac had the energies of Imperiex, the energies of a Big Bang. Now it is up to you tbh. Brainiac used those energies to fight sundipped Superman, trying to prevent him from being braught to the beginning of the universe as it would mean his end. Would he use everything at his disposal to prevent this or would he just use a bit of energy to see if it is enough?

To Give you a measure. Before that when Imperiex armor was broken and the energies of a big bang released, Kyle was strong enough to hold them in a forcefield.

Everything was written by Loeb.

I don't think the Kyle example helps tbh. Maybe if Hal were doing it but Kyle is the worst.

Also lol at the post above. The best part is the implication that I post on Hero chat. Oh Phildo. Did you wait a couple of days to post this just to try and say you don't have time?

Also time frame is different from time for the uninformed. If I wanted to do a battle zone though I would have done one already though. Duh.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
The best part is the implication that I post on Hero chat. Oh Phildo.
What? No. The way you're posting reminds me of a poster there, that's all.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
If I wanted to do a battle zone though I would have done one already though. Duh.
You're acting as if battlezones are some time consuming labors. They're the opposite - limited posts with succinct arguments, ruled by judges.

They're most effective way of debating anything.

Certainly better than attrition debates, where who has the 'last word' seems to be the sole basis of who is right.

But hey, next time we debate, you know what to do...
Vomit words on walls of text knowing I probably won't have the time/patience to respond, and then run away when it comes to actually proving the validity of your arguments in a set environment.

👆

You've lost like every debate you've ever had with me attrition or not and the last one had you hiding for a month or two. I don't think you can point fingers there pal. Plus it'd be the exact same thing anyway but within a set timezone so... yeah great points. Being thorough is a negative but it makes sense coming from you.

But on a relevant topic, I literally don't know when I'm going to work next outside a couple days notice. It'd be like you saying who's cock you're going to suck when they just pick you up off the street. It's not ideal.
Then there's the part where I don't nor have I ever wanted to do a battle zone. I think I've turned down Carver before. 😬

But I can see this means a lot to you. You can add this in your win column I guess. A person who's never shown any interest in a Battlezone won't Battlezone you. Good job.

Also lol at you throwing out bz challenges because you didn't like a post. What's going to happen when Leo makes a post you don't like?

But you can have this "war of attrition". 😂

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
You've lost like every debate you've ever had with me attrition or not
😂

You're so cute.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
Plus it'd be the exact same thing anyway but within a set timezone so... yeah great points. Being thorough is a negative but it makes sense coming from you.
You can be as thorough as you like, we just get 5 posts each, and judges who rule a decision.

You can even call it something other than battlezone, if it makes you feel better.

The only distinction between a battlezone and a normal thread, where you have no problem posting walls of texts and multiple posts, is that there's no more than 5 posts and there are judges.

That's it.

I'm sparing myself [and you] wasted time of back and forth.

You're hiding behind the word 'battlezone'.

It's just another thread..

What are you so afraid of?

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
But on a relevant topic, I literally don't know when I'm going to work next outside a couple days notice.

We'll extend the battlezone to two weeks. Hell, make it three weeks. Three weeks in which you have to get only 5 posts in.

You're probably typing as many in two average days of KMC.

Are you going to keep dodging?

Originally posted by Sin I AM
Thats not the question i asked. I asked if he was pushing against the power of the big bang which he wasn't
But I'm not sure. But he was pushing against at least thousands of galaxies of power.

😂

Full on desperation now. Meltdown imminent.

Originally posted by h1a8
I would say no. But I'm not sure. But he was pushing against at least thousands of galaxies of power.

Post the quote/scan that states this.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
😂

Full on desperation now. Meltdown imminent.

👆

You'll never get over your inferiority complex unless you stand up to me. 🙂

Originally posted by Philosophía
👆

You'll never get over your inferiority complex unless you stand up to me. 🙂

That certainly appears to be the case here.

Anyway. No bzs in 8 years looks like it's going to continue. You may have the last word here with your desperate challenges. I'm scared of you, 5 posts isn't a lot, please do it, etc.

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
😂

Full on desperation now. Meltdown imminent.

Phil the guy who shows up every six months is being quite bold these days. He might even respond for a day or two before going missing again. I doubt it though he's so fickle these days.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Phil the guy who shows up every six months is being quite bold these days. He might even respond for a day or two before going missing again. I doubt it though he's so fickle these days.
He's just sick of arguments going on long enough that he can't come up with a counter imo. He thinks he's found the answer. Who can blame him tbh though? Poor guy must have went through heck and back trying to answer them. He's now adopted a Wesker persona to fix everything.

5 posts. 5 posts is all he has to spare with you.

On another note our last argument that he ran away from for like a month or so can't have been longer than 5 posts each... something doesn't add up here...

OK really last post on the subject. I couldn't help myself. ****ing Quan.

Quan makes everybody respond to him... even when you don't wanna. It's a special talent of his.

Originally posted by krisblaze
Thor was dropping heralds before he even picked up the gem though...

Superman's very impressive 'heat vision, ice-breath and punch in same spot' amp was very, very impressive 😛

Like I mentioned earlier, Galactus didn't one-shot Thor. OWAW Supes ain't pulling it off.

Originally posted by krisblaze
So Galactus' energy blasts are less than Superman's punches?

Before he picked up the gem...

Probes were not trans level beings lmfao.


Are we seriously using Galactus as a measuring stick here?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Are we seriously using Galactus as a measuring stick here?
If you can't see the point he was making then maybe debating isn't for you, kiddo.

Originally posted by Silent Master
Post the quote/scan that states this.
it was shown in the panel that Superman was pushing against the Imperiex energies. Then we have Brainiacs narrative, "FULL thruster countermeasure..How is he moving my planet?! The kryptonian doesn't have that power!"

Originally posted by h1a8
it was shown in the panel that Superman was pushing against the Imperiex energies. Then we have Brainiacs narrative, "FULL thruster countermeasure..How is he moving my planet?! The kryptonian doesn't have that power!"
And you equate that to the power of the Big Bang? 🙁

Originally posted by h1a8
it was shown in the panel that Superman was pushing against the Imperiex energies. Then we have Brainiacs narrative, "FULL thruster countermeasure..How is he moving my planet?! The kryptonian doesn't have that power!"

Again, post the scan or quote that actually states Superman was pushing against "at least thousands of galaxies of power".

Originally posted by Silent Master
Again, post the scan or quote that actually states Superman was pushing against "at least thousands of galaxies of power".

Why?
If it doesn't state this then that means it isn't true?

Originally posted by h1a8
Why?
If it doesn't state this then that means it isn't true?

You made the claim, so post the scan or quote where it stated/shown.