The Renegade
Trapped within
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
you keep talking about your 3 friends who may or may not have been there, as if helping someone jack off over the thought of raping their niece is ok as long as it's supervised. you might want to warn them that you're dragging them into this, assuming they exist.
No, you've lost the plot. It's not about it being okay. It is being questioned and having witnesses is fantastic in the fact that it was genuinely research. As I've said, you still have nothing. You keep on just talking, without much back-up. It's a bit absurd now.
your story makes no sense and your attempts at justification are the reason why you are the one becoming famous among british rap battlers.
The problem here is that it makes sense. You going on about how it was an "excuse" and all of this other crap doesn't suddenly make it not make sense.
"im not justifying my actions...though my research may have helped the situation...did i say that? oh i was just kidding yukyukyuk"
When did I say I was kidding about me claiming it may have helped? I said I was wrong about that later on.
Originally posted by Bashar Teg
well basically nemebro got really drunk last night and mistakenly white-knighted sorgo because he was too emotionally invested in pointing out an imaginary accusation he was sure that i made (concerning his own confession).the backstory is that they each helped AC play with himself while he fantasized about sexually assaulting a family member.
but sorgo feels that his actions were not as bad because:
1- he only did it for 'research'.
2- he claims that other people were in his room witnessing.
3- he also claims that he never stuck around for AC's orgasm because he ended up finally having an ethical crisis.
Are you actually insane? Are you going to SIT HERE and try to say that me pretending to enjoy texting someone about sex is as bad as extracting nudes from underage girls?
Is there ANYONE else who has a really, really massive issue with this?
on a side note, he claimed at least twice that it's possible that his research at least distracted and 'duped' AC for a short time. if questioned on this he'll tell you he was just joking.
I did say it may have distracted him but later when on to admit that it probably wasn't effective in doing it.
The "duped" comment was a joke. Why wouldn't I say it was a joke when it was? I said, " 'Cause I duped a creep." Clear cut taking the piss.
So, I'm going to discuss your current problems here.
A) You're making claims it wasn't research without evidence. Sure, I'm making claims it was without it but firstly, I was THERE and came forward with it. Secondly, I have witnesses that can tell you I was doing that and that they were there for it. You have nothing, PVS. What I'm saying is either get something or stop obsessing about the issue.
B) You don't get to magically determine my intent. My "dupe" comment was a joke, period. You actually had the audacity to say you had "evidence" it wasn't a joke and it was just you AGAIN saying, "See? It was serious." So, you're either trolling (which you may end up saying) or you're being outrageously foolish.