The Share your "Research" thread

Started by The Renegade17 pages

You're not owed evidence, though. As I've said previously, I won't repeat myself. I never implied it was okay/alright so I'm not quite understanding your position.

I don't recall attempting to confuse or distract much of anything. If you're getting that, it's your fault. I've been quite clear with my explanation. If I wanted to "cover" my ass, I would've mentioned nothing or have been long gone by now.

I wouldn't be rejoining either. I haven't left. Also, why wouldn't I focus on you? You're obsessed with me and will dash everything that's given to you. That's the point. It's how you operate, which isn't a big deal.

As I've said, you have nothing. You can complain that you haven't seen "text" or any of my research but I've provided what I can to people that have been genuine in inquiring. You're here to troll, which is what you self-admittedly do, so if we're discussing damaged credibility? Consider that, PVS.

You haven't really had much to say or respond to, besides recycling, "Guys, he thinks it's okay when he said it wasn't! Guys, no evidence he provides does/will matter! Guys, it wasn't really research and he got off!"

You'll provide laughs, most likely, for some. You do that once in a while. However, you've had nothing to say of substance to me when I tell you to bring something that I haven't heard a dozen times already to the table.

So, continue being goofy. That's alright. Don't pretend you're serious here, though. It's a joke. You've built that all by yourself too.

PVS profilie

Listing his interests here

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/member.php?s=&action=getinfo&userid=33570

"playing drama" and "anticts", "flaming, provoking, and harrassing"

Hmm what a odd one.

Yeah, I doubt he wrote that about himself. Silly rabbit.

Originally posted by Syren
Yeah, I doubt he wrote that about himself. Silly rabbit.

Lol, who else wrote it.

srug

Probably WD.

I don't have reason to think someone else wrote it unless he was being labeled. Usually people just fess that stuff up. Either case its the truth.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
PVS profilie

Listing his interests here

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/member.php?s=&action=getinfo&userid=33570

"playing drama" and "anticts", "flaming, provoking, and harrassing"

Hmm what a odd one.

You're starting to come off a being obsessed with PVS. Just an FYI.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
I don't have reason to think someone else wrote it unless he was being labeled. Usually people just fess that stuff up. Either case its the truth.

Personally, it doesn't read as though PVS wrote it. It's not grammatically correct. 'Antics' is spelled incorrectly. It looks like something a foreign Mod might have written, hence my guess at WD.

this is about as relevant to the topic as nude pics of syren.

...though the latter would be a much more pleasing distraction, rather than sorgo's compulsive self-justification and the obvious diversionary tactics of bro-shield supra.

Originally posted by Syren
Personally, it doesn't read as though PVS wrote it. It's not grammatically correct. 'Antics' is spelled incorrectly. It looks like something a foreign Mod might have written, hence my guess at WD.

I guess it could be interpreted as both, if the mod wrote it, it was done for a reason.

Originally posted by Bashar Teg
this is about as relevant to the topic as nude pics of syren.

...though the latter would be a much more pleasing distraction, rather than sorgo's compulsive self-justification and the obvious diversionary tactics of bro-shield supra.

Diversionary? Were you actually getting somewhere in this investigation of prattling drama?

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
I guess it could be interpreted as both, if the mod wrote it, it was done for a reason.

Not necessarily. Not all mods are capable of objectivity.

Regardless, I like PVS, so this discussion is kind of pointless as I'm always going to disagree with you 🙂

Originally posted by Syren
Not necessarily. Not all mods are capable of objectivity.

Regardless, I like PVS, so this discussion is kind of pointless as I'm always going to disagree with you 🙂

Fair enough, you are the first woman here to admit that. 🙂

I noticed some factually incorrect statements in this thread and as a perfectionist, know-it-all, pedant, I have to correct those things:

1. PVS is over 40 and has been for a while.

2. TE is not dick riding Renegade nor does he even really know this him. He's not white knighting for Renegade: not even close. Instead, he's calling out the bullshit in this thread...and making jokes.

3. AC is not a pedophile: he's a ephebophile. He's not a hebephile, either. Additionally, ephebophilia is usually not considered a pathology and is not mentioned in DSM-V. It only becomes a pathology when it negatively impacts an individual's ability to function or causes them to do bad stuff, such as ACs actions in trying to solicit nudes from minors. You do not even need a psychologist to determine this. If your actions have caused you to do criminal stuff, it's a pathology that's easily labeled. I know, shocker: it's not a pathology to find fully sexually mature humans, attractive. So utterly groundbreaking, I know. Let's not disparage AC's perfectly normal and acceptable attractions to females: that's not the problem. He's not a pedo as he clearly likes boobs: something prepubescent females do NOT have. His problem was how he acted on those attractions: literally, like a criminal.*

Additionally, it only took Sorgo and I 2 posts to discuss his research and get over it/stop discussing it. Clearly, that's a record. We should be awarded something. Do they still give out internet cookies?

*I asked about it in the other thread but is getting nudes from a 16 year old in the UK, criminal? Their age of consent is different than many US States. It may not be criminal. In the US, anyone under 18, it counts as criminal distribution of CP which is a very serious crime.

Originally posted by dadudemon
1. PVS is over 40 and has been for a while.

thats actually not true. so much for your quest for perfection.

age: 39

fact count: 0

Originally posted by dadudemon
2. TE is not dick riding Renegade nor does he even really know this him. He's not white knighting for Renegade: not even close. Instead, he's calling out the bullshit in this thread...and making jokes.

that is just your opinion. it could be that you only have this opinion because you are joining the obvious diversionary/apologist bro-shield. then again you have not compulsively followed me around derailing threads like TE/supra, so i won't pretend to know the fact of your motive.

fact count: 0

Originally posted by dadudemon
3. AC is not a pedophile: he's a ephebophile. He's not a hebephile, either. Additionally, ephebophilia is usually not considered a pathology and is not mentioned in DSM-V. It only becomes a pathology when it negatively impacts an individual's ability to function or causes them to do bad stuff, such as ACs actions in trying to solicit nudes from minors. You do not even need a psychologist to determine this. If your actions have caused you to do criminal stuff, it's a pathology that's easily labeled. I know, shocker: it's not a pathology to find fully sexually mature humans, attractive. So utterly groundbreaking, I know. Let's not disparage AC's perfectly normal and acceptable attractions to females: that's not the problem. He's not a pedo as he clearly likes boobs: something prepubescent females do NOT have. His problem was how he acted on those attractions: literally, like a criminal.*

then i guess AC is exonerated since he propositioned sarah when she was 19. that would make him neither pedo nor hebo...when your silly attempt at reasoning is applied. pedophile and hebephile are not mutually exclusive, either. one can easily be both.

fact count: 0

Originally posted by dadudemon
Additionally, it only took Sorgo and I 2 posts to discuss his research and get over it/stop discussing it. Clearly, that's a record. We should be awarded something. Do they still give out internet cookies?

it took him 2 posts to satisfy you. again your opinion does not denote fact. so....

fact count: 0

Originally posted by dadudemon
*I asked about it in the other thread but is getting nudes from a 16 year old in the UK, criminal? Their age of consent is different than many US States. It may not be criminal. In the US, anyone under 18, it counts as criminal distribution of CP which is a very serious crime.

blackmail is illegal as is using nude photos for blackmail. i know you seem to consider that a superfical detail but there it is.

fact count- still 0

the bro-shield has obviously increased by 1 bro.

oh well, i did enjoy the serenity our brief ceasefire.

^above

Butthurt

Below More Butthurt🙂

Originally posted by PVS
..ok, its rant time you weeping nannies, you gushing pussies...you forced me to do this...

[QUOTE=14850863]Originally posted by carver9
[B]Loki is too durable to lose to Zod.

robtard, marius, i always held a soft spot in my heart for you...

...but with that said...

you two are behaving like a couple of chicken livered half-a-*******.

back-story: i once greatly enjoyed kmc. sure it wasnt an oasis in the desert of mediocrity like many of these divas liked to have claimed, but it was a place of forwardly mobile discussion among an eccentrically diverse cross section of the world population (gdf specific). maybe just one of many or even all forums, but it was one i invested my time in. thats whats important, as im sure your time was important to you...however wasted.

it was a place where polar opposites such as feceman and i could manage to see some common ground, and realize that maybe...just maybe...the polarization of individuals such as we was merely an illusion fabricated by a media-dominated generation of readily-programmed puppets who had no ability to see the forest from the trees...

...and that maybe socially conscious people like us could rise above the mega-hype and actually find a kinship. it was a healing experience during the bush years (a time which deeply tested my faith in humanity IRL) which educated me to not think in black/white good/bad and accept others' opinions and simply argue them at face value.

it was a long string of unifying discussions that needed to happen, after an eternity of divide-and-conquer politics. a simple collection of humans reasoning with humans. putting forth ideas and allowing them to be (in general) challenged in a non-assaulting manner, without threat to personal image or damage to one's ego. it was a golden age that was blossoming, like a pussy just waiting to get ****ed.

...but then came the ddm/RJ tag team....bent on disrupting all civil discourse. one for the sake of elevation of self image, the other for...i guess 16 year old girls and internet meme jpg's. whatever the case 2 people with way too much time on their hands just. killed it. dead...while slobbering over the proper moderator dicks to assure that their faggotry would not be called out and ended utterly.

after that, i had no reason to stay at kmc, so i requested my banning from my adorable aids bunny backfire. but it was with a heavy heart, i assure you.

point: you can play 'dali lama' and forgive/forget and attain your sense of universal peace. i wont hold it against you. whatever floats your boat...*******.

however i will remain the unforgiving whore-mother of cocksuckers, forever taunting and tormenting these suckers of satans' cock until they offer high-pitch squeals of apologies for all the faggotry they forced us to endure, because thats what i enjoy doing. its how i justify my time spent at kmc. THIS. what you see. if not then i shall make their experience here as unenjoyable as possible, simply for the lulz.

yes, they will reply with ineffectual cries of "u mad?" and spam smilies, and you will pretend not to cringe for the sake of diplomacy...but i assure you that i will not faultier...

...after all...they tasks me. they TASK me, and I shall HAVE them. i'll chase them around the moons of nibia, and around the antares maelstrom, and round perdition's flames before I give them up!

so in other words, to summarize: **** you, pussies[/B][/QUOTE]

You realize that if anyone clicks on the "post" to see the source, it leads back to something else, yeah?

edit: You also have some quote from Carver mixed it.

Bash even google failed with this one. No one has a clue what a broshield is, should I ask siri?

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=what+is+a+broshield

Originally posted by Robtard
You realize that if anyone clicks on the "post" to see the source, it leads back to something else, yeah?

edit: You also have some quote from Carver mixed it.

Oh thats the quote broski nothing I can do 😆

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Bash even google failed with this one. No one has a clue what a broshield is, should I ask siri?

https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=what+is+a+broshield

Broshielding is protecting a fellow [male] poster after they'll done/said something damning.