Originally posted by krisblaze
I'm not sure Thor's skill-advantage can make up for Superman's advantage in strength.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Skill advantage? Superman just beat someone who was better in every category than him by a huge margin, after he was hurt badly and poisoned by kryptonite by his skills. When has Thor beaten someone stronger than him by his skills?
Other than that Thor beat every warrior in Asgard barring Sif and Odin before he had Mjolnir.
Originally posted by krisblaze
Well, Masterson couldn't even touch Thor, and Masterson did receive a significant amount of training.Other than that Thor beat every warrior in Asgard barring Sif and Odin before he had Mjolnir.
Well, Thor was stronger than everybody. So its not such a good feat as you think.
Originally posted by Galan007
Superman vs. Wraith (2/2):
When has Thor beaten such an opponent as Wraith?
Originally posted by abhilegend
Masterson received training? When? And masterson got blitzed by Spider-man under the same writer. But leaping around someone as fast as you is one thing. Beating the shit out of someone faster than you is another.
Masterson had some shit moments though.
Originally posted by abhilegend
Well, Thor was stronger than everybody. So its not such a good feat as you think.
That aside, there aren't many incidents where he's fighting barehanded.
Just seems silly to toss aside thousands of years of fighting because Superman had one recent fight where he used his skills 🙂
Originally posted by krisblaze
By Cap?Masterson had some shit moments though.
Doesn't matter if they never touched him.
That aside, there aren't many incidents where he's fighting barehanded.
Just seems silly to toss aside thousands of years of fighting because Superman had one recent fight where he used his skills 🙂
What kind of reasoning is that? We go by feats of skills, not years of experience. By that account Wildcat must be more skilled than Batman because he is decades older.
😬
Originally posted by abhilegend
Not much training IIRC.
He received some, but obviously not enough.
Originally posted by abhilegend
What kind of reasoning is that? We go by feats of skills, not years of experience. By that account Wildcat must be more skilled than Batman because he is decades older.😬
The reasoning is that the guy who mainly fights with his hands/hammer, is the best out of a race of warriors and has consistently been the best will generally do better than someone who's been fighting for maybe 5-10 years and always has a massive advantage in strength/durability/speed.
Superman's one fight doesn't change any of this.
Thor beat Loki and Fenris when he was depowered.
Hell, he was keeping up with Cap in Ellis' run.
