Originally posted by Philosophía
Good. The surely you must agree the burden of proof falls on you, the one who mode the initial claim without supporting it.Here's how it is: for every piece of evidence you bring of Thor's strength, I'll bring another piece of evidence that proves Superman is stronger.
Yes. You've failed.
I'm taking the spotlight away.
ha-som
What I thought exactly would happen. Smh..
Thor is a peer of other top tiers like Hulk, Orion, Shazam(Billy), Hyperion, etc, etc... Now Superman could be stronger than most of these peers of his(debatable), but to claim that he is noticeably stronger than Thor by proxy would put these guys well below him too. That would be stupid based on their histories.
Now quit with the usual posturing and chest beating which you are so known for and just "prove" that Superman is noticeably stronger. This is an open forum and you are the one making bold claims. So like I said before, be my guest.
I'd also like to add that Thor is also a peer in overall durability, stamina, damage soak, and the like which would make this fight close.. Still taking Thor with the edge.