Originally posted by abhilegend
You should call the writer and complain about it. When narration compares something to big bang and the results are more like of a grenade, we are supposed to take that explosion as big bang?😬
Or maybe you're the one who should ring the writer and artist and complain they've not properly shown the effects of a Big Bang. Explain to them you're a fanatic comic book fan who expects to see the Universe exploding when they show the force of a Big Bang.
It's most likely the Mjolnir's took the whole blast themselves? But either way the shockwave resonated throughout the cosmos LOL. So a blast that can only shatter windows can be felt throughout the cosmos? It's obviously the typical inconsistent crap for which they can't be bothered portraying it's full effects properly.
But at least they explained (in the very scan you gave) that the effects of the mystical forces of Mjolnir does not necessarily follow the normal rules of science.
Originally posted by abhilegend
I accept plenty of Thor's strength feats. Just not in the same way Thor fans pretend.Incorrect on both point. But that's like a habit for you now.
Heh, anything disputing the ambiguous showings from Thor is now lowballing? My, my, aren't thorbags insecure? Why don't you explain to me the strength feats of Thor.
Oh really? So exactly which Herald level feats of Thor do you accept? This ought to be good.
You have a reputation of having double standards when it comes to Thor feats compared to Superman feats. You also have a reputation of going to stupendous lengths to attempt to deny/lowball Thor feats whilst Praising similar level feats of Superman. Basically it's well known on these boards that your opinion isn't a very Objective one. Not by a long shot.
What's ambiguous? Feats are on a cosmic scale- You reject them on the basis of not being Quantified. Feats are clearly Quantified even by the narrator- You reject them as Hyperbole. Similar feats performed by Superman-