Bill Williamson vs LW Flamethrower dude

Started by RJ 2.02 pages

Bill Williamson vs LW Flamethrower dude

Bill Williamson from "Rampage" versus the Flamethrower dude from the opening scene of "Lethal Weapon 4."

Bill:

YouTube video

Flamethrower dude:

YouTube video

Bill is in the place of the cops. He must kill the Flamethrower dude. Can he do it? Bill has all his guns from all his movies.

You're probably the only person that has seen Rampage.

Bill, Flamethrower dude was a basically one shotted.

Originally posted by Robtard
You're probably the only person that has seen Rampage.
Why I posted a vid.

Originally posted by RJ 2.0
Why I posted a vid.

Then going off that vid, Rampage dude takes it.

Bill was actually shown to be something of a tactical genius. He'd definitely win.

Bill shoves that flamers head up his own ass

Has anyone seen the sequel? He's even more badass now. He's pretty much a sniper despite dual wielding M4A1's. And he's Equalizer level when it comes to getting things to go his way and prep.

Lol no. he was no marksman, and marksmanship is what it will take to shoot the valve on the guys back. That's IF Bill figures it out. And remember, it only worked for Riggs because Murtaugh distracted the guy. No way in hell does he turn his back on Bill.

He can blast away all he wants on the guy but dude has armor just like Bill has. Also, if Bill takes cover behind a car or something, dude can just spam the car with fire and advance on Bill, eventually burning him to a crisp.

Bill loses.

Goddamn Uwe boll movie.

Does Bill get his explosives? Since he used them regularly throughout both movies?

Bill shoots him and blows him up, easier then Bill

Game over.

Originally posted by KingD19
Does Bill get his explosives? Since he used them regularly throughout both movies?
No, guns only.

Originally posted by RJ 2.0
Lol no. he was no marksman, and marksmanship is what it will take to shoot the valve on the guys back. That's IF Bill figures it out. And remember, it only worked for Riggs because Murtaugh distracted the guy. No way in hell does he turn his back on Bill.

He can blast away all he wants on the guy but dude has armor just like Bill has. Also, if Bill takes cover behind a car or something, dude can just spam the car with fire and advance on Bill, eventually burning him to a crisp.

Bill loses.

You whacked,son. Flamer guy had multiple unarmoured points; the only reason he wasn't downed earlier is because Riggs and Murtaugh both have shit aim (at least in that scene).

Bill unloads twin SMGs, they're hitting fleshy bits and flamer-man goes down.

Originally posted by Robtard
You whacked,son. Flamer guy had multiple unarmoured points; the only reason he wasn't downed earlier is because Riggs and Murtaugh both have shit aim (at least in that scene).

Bill unloads twin SMGs, they're hitting fleshy bits and flamer-man goes down.

How do they have shit aim? They were aiming at the guy, center mass, and every bullet struck home. It was then that Riggs figured out dude had on armor, head to toe. No bullets, pistol or SMG, are getting through that. How do I know this? Because Bill's SMG's and Riggs 9mm fire the same bullet. Pwned.

And about Riggs "Shit aim", fail. His aim is better than most gun wielders in movie history.

Try again, try harder.

Originally posted by RJ 2.0
How do they have shit aim? They were aiming at the guy, center mass, and every bullet struck home. It was then that Riggs figured out dude had on armor, head to toe.

No bullets, pistol or SMG, are getting through that. How do I know this? Because Bill's SMG's and Riggs 9mm fire the same bullet. Pwned.

And about Riggs "Shit aim", fail. His aim is better than most gun wielders in movie history.

Try again, try harder.

The guy had multiple unarmoured spots, after a few shots failed to penetrate the armored bits, they could have aimed elsewhere. It was a silly/stupid scene.

Rampage could have .22 rounds, and they'd still penetrate the unarmoured bits. So your "pwned" has been revoked.

I qualified it with "in that scene", so calm yourself.

Originally posted by Robtard
The guy had multiple unarmoured spots, after a few shots failed to penetrate the armored bits, they could have aimed elsewhere. It was a silly/stupid scene.

Rampage could have .22 rounds, and they'd still penetrate the unarmoured bits. So your "pwned" has been revoked.

I qualified it with "in that scene", so calm yourself.

So you are clinging to "unarmored spots", yeah? Prove it. Post the scene, point out where the "unarmored spots" are.

Until then, concede.

The vid's right above you, dude. All the shinier silverish bits are not armour, it's the flame resistance suit he's wearing under his armour. His hands and most of his arms and legs are not protected.

Rampage sprays twin SMGs, he's hitting unarmoured bits

Originally posted by Robtard
The vid's right above you, dude. All the shinier silverish bits are not armour, it's the flame resistance suit he's wearing under his armour. His hands and most of his arms and legs are not protected.

Rampage sprays twin SMGs, he's hitting unarmoured bits

Fail. Bullets are seen bouncing off the "Unarmored bits."

Try again.

Originally posted by RJ 2.0
Fail. Bullets are seen bouncing off the "Unarmored bits."

Try again.

Nope