Originally posted by AstnerPeople get hurt and die everyday. God would seemingly rather take the life of a celebrity than mine - and you're not smarter than me; you just care more about being smart than I ever will.
I'm not a fictional character, and neither are you. What you are is a loon in need of psychiatric treatment before you end up hurting yourself or anyone else.
Originally posted by Oneness
and you're not smarter than me; you just care more about being smart than I ever will.
The difference is that I was able to advance as intended in the educational environment while you failed; Isaac Newton too enrolled in college early and excelled.
Originally posted by AstnerYou're incorrect about Newton. He just excelled in math. Something I don't really care about.
You're retaking high school classes at the same age I was studying Plasma Physics and Lie Algebra.The difference is that I was able to advance as intended in the educational environment while you failed; Isaac Newton too enrolled in college early and excelled.
Einstein was about at my level. You're that because you're more successful than Einstein, that you're more intellectually talented? 😆
I'm taking it easy on your right now, you think that your education isn't a crock of shit when considering how island intelligence works. Newton, Einstein, and Barnett were island intellects, at lower levels than me. More impaired all around. They did nucleotide-sequencing experiments that succeeded on mice in the 80's. They took a lil' of faith with my embryo, I know. I'm not exactly of precedence which explains why I'm a seemingly late bloomer. I assure you though comparatively I was hit by gamma blast like Banner.
They say one can only guess how a quadrupled-digit IQ would function in society - behold.
Originally posted by Oneness
Einstein was about at my level. You're that because you're more successful than Einstein, that you're more intellectually talented? 😆
Originally posted by Oneness
I'm taking it easy on your right now, you think that your education isn't a crock of shit when considering how island intelligence works.
Originally posted by Oneness
Newton, Einstein, and Barnett were island intellects, at lower levels than me. More impaired all around. They did nucleotide-sequencing experiments that succeeded on mice in the 80's. They took a lil' of faith with my embryo, I know. I'm not exactly of precedence which explains why I'm a seemingly late bloomer. I assure you though comparatively I was hit by gamma blast like Banner.
Originally posted by Oneness
They say one can only guess how a quadrupled-digit IQ would function in society - behold.
Originally posted by Oneness
Psychology, a course taught in the schools that you so arbitrarily appraise on their beneficiaries such as yourself, say otherwise.
Originally posted by Astnerlol.
As far as I'm aware no school of thought in Psychology recognizes the legitimacy of an IQ test as a credible measurement of cognitive abilities.
You really are pretty dull, or you're just a faux-intellectual conniver, or perhaps you never aced college Psyche as I have?
Why in the name of fsuck would they cover it, or their preceding hypotheses for that matter, then?
Originally posted by Oneness
lol.You really are pretty dull, or you're just a faux-intellectual conniver, or perhaps you never aced college Psyche as I have?
Why in the name of fsuck would they cover it, or their preceding hypotheses for that matter, then?
Originally posted by Oneness
Moreover, why in the fsuck would it be utilized on infants as a standard medical procedure?Think before assuming I'm ignorant about things pertaining to common-sense. lol
It's a part of cognitive psychology, and not just in school, dumbass.
Originally posted by AstnerYes, Jake Barnett's was 80, mine was average.
Infants are taking IQ tests? Do you even know how an IQ test is conducted?
But what you don't seem to understand is that it's different for people like me and Jake Barnett.
Originally posted by Oneness
Yes, Jake Barnett's was 80, mine was average.
You're not an infant at the age of 6 - 16.
Originally posted by AstnerAre you pretending to be thick right now?
"The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC), developed by David Wechsler, is an individually administered intelligence test for children between the ages of 6 and 16 inclusive that can be completed without reading or writing."You're not an infant at the age of 6 - 16.
Did I not use the word infant?
You're the one who claimed IQ was a pseudo-science, lame****.
Originally posted by Oneness
Are you pretending to be thick right now?Did I not use the word infant?
Originally posted by Oneness
You're the one who claimed IQ was a pseudo-science, lame****.
Originally posted by Astner
Yes you did use the word infant, a six year old isn't an infant.
It's between infancy and adolescence, actually closer to infancy than the latter, and there is no middle-term. Adolescence is "close-enough". I consider your argument here to be more irrelevant than this:
It is non-scientific because it's a test score that doesn't reflect what it's suggested to reflect. Moreover, the largest and most comprehensive MRI study ever conducted in the field of neurobiology suggests that the very idea that intelligence can be measured with a single number is wrong, source.
That's a 2012 accuracy, do you really believe your education is that up to date?
You're an even larger fool than I took you for. 😆
I mean, I'm educating you while drunk. Not that your professors or anyone's professor's, don't do that on occasion. Because, quite frankly, professor's are paid to suck at what they do. Unlike movers, or waiters, etc.