Originally posted by FrothByte
I practice HEMA, which is mostly medieval and renaissance sword-fighting arts. And though I'm by no means an expert at it, I'm pretty sure I know more about sword combat than your average internet forum warrior.
No one knows more about combat than me, not even those who practice HEMA.
And let me tell you, every single movie sword fight is silly. Even the fight in Rob Roy is ridiculous if you take it from a realistic point of view.
Why's that? There's a little flynning, but they fought like men trying to kill each other.
The fight scene from Troy didn't have this aspect. They avoided obvious holes in their opponent's defenses and mostly danced in close proximity of one another. 👆
That said, the choreography in Hector vs. Achilles was very tight, aggressive and brutal. A whole lot better than any Star Wars light saber fight. And while I do think Rob Roy's sword fight was better, I also know that trying to choreograph a fight with sword, shield and spear is a hell lot harder than choreographing a fight of sword vs. sword.
This is the same fight where Achilles bared his neck to Hector, begging him to stab it, only for Hector to swing over Achilles' head. Or when Hector wielded his sword and broken spear. Half the time he barely seemed to remember he had the broken spear.
Was it stylized and tight? Sure. But it was very flashy with no substance. Aggressive? Brutal? No not really. It was a dance scene.
Is it really though? I'm no cinematographer, but it seems to me that making a fight scene where there are more ways to kill someone is actually easier.