Hancock and Superman (Cavill) vs Avengers and X-men with Magneto

Originally posted by Placidity
For example Dark Phoenix, Wolverine, Xavier could potentially hurt Hancock. But its not about any single mutant.

If I had to create a team to take the duo down:

[b]Telepathy:

1. Dark Phoenix
2. Professor X
3. Emma Frost
4. Jason Stryker
5. Jean Grey

Should be able to mind rape anyone.

Main Attack Force:

1. Dark Phoenix
2. Apocalypse (given only TK feats)
3. Magneto
4. Shaw (Team Amped by Cyclops/Havok/Sunspot/Gambit/Pyro)
5. Juggernaut
6. Rogue (Absorbed everyone's powers)
7. Deadpool
8. Wolverine
9. Lady Deathstrike
10. Sunspot (Hancock a little vulnerable to heat?)
11. Havok
12. Agent Zero (Adamantium Bullets - guided by Magneto)
13. Silver Samurai
14. Colossus (physical integrity supported by Magneto)

Support (aid other mutants in attack or avoid death):

1. Blink
2. Azazel
3. Nightcrawler
4. Quicksilver
5. Shadowcat
6. Ink (make Hancock throw up)
7. John Wraith

Distractions / Human Shields

- Every other mutant on the Earth - lets say 1 million (gross underestimate).
- Job is to distract the opponent or to take hits for the important players.

X-men Universe stomps. [/B]

Well if we're talking about every named mutant at once, let alone the entire verse, then yeah Supes and Hancock would lose since they're fighting the enemy on their home turf (and I don't see why they'd all be in the same place at once due to homefield) and the sheer variety of hax they have. Another verse to back them, then yeah

Well, what if Hancock destroys the moon or if Superman decides to enter the core of earth and destroysit. I find no mutant capable of stopping them.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Hancock and Supes rapestomp

I think if Handcock and Superman worked together(which I can't imagine happening), they could probably beat avengers and x-men, but Thor's a freakin' god. Soyeah

Why wouldn't they work together? Hancock by the end of the movie was a much better guy and had no problem being a team player or sacrificing himself to save his friends. And Clark's the nicest guy ever.

Also Superman and Hancock both have feats that outshine pretty much anything Thor did. Hancock is also a God. And Superman may as well be.

Wasn't Hancock an angel?

Not that it really matters as being called a god or angel isn't really a feat, it's just a title/name.

Hancock: You and I...
Mary Embrey: You and I what?
Hancock: ...we're the same.
Mary Embrey: No. I'm stronger.
Hancock: Really?
Mary Embrey: [smiling] Oh yeah.
Hancock: Who are we?
Mary Embrey: Gods, angels... Different cultures call us by different names. Now all of a sudden it's superhero.
Hancock: Are there more of us?
Mary Embrey: There were. They all died. It's just the two of us.

Doesn't really matter what he is, his feats stand as shown.

On a side note, rumors of a Hancock 2 happening are still there.

I know. I was pointing out that the title of "God" doesn't mean anything. Hancock's called a God just like Thor is, but Hancock has better feats plain and simple. He could even arguably stand against Thor when it comes to tornadoes/winds since he could summon them. Mary's department was lightning and stuff.

Hancock 2 yes.

we need that 'cock in our lives.

Hancock's train feat is probably the best strength and durability feat in a superhero movie after Superman lifting the k-nite island.

3rd if you count Magneto's bridge feat. it's not a physical strength feat exactly, but it's a lifting feat nonetheless

It's a feat of his magnetic powers, not physical strength, which is what Psychotron was referring to

which is also what i said.

.... then why mention it?

Why point out it was a magnetic manipulation feat and not a strength feat when he did so himself in his post?

Originally posted by marwash22
3rd [b]if you count Magneto's bridge feat. it's not a physical strength feat exactly, but it's a lifting feat nonetheless [/B]

Originally posted by KingD19
Why point out it was a magnetic manipulation feat and not a strength feat when he did so himself in his post?

Because Psychotron was clearly referring to physical strength feats, not feats performed due to some form of energy manipulation

Hence why mentioning Magneto's feat was, completely pointless