Maul & Savage vs. 4 Council Member

At least Nala's posts will still be here by the end of the day 😉

I guess Shaak Ti > Plo Koon too, and by extension would be about on par with the likes of Ventress and Kenobi. Awesome.

Originally posted by Marco1907
and Shaak Ti is fool as well since she get ass kicked by Grievous.

Is that so? Well I guess that makes Aayla a shitty duelist since Aayla was completely tossed around like a ragdoll against Grevious on Hypori, While Shaak Ti held her ground despite being exhausted from battle. So i guess that makes her(Aayla) a crappy jedi and therefore it makes Maul's feat of taking on her and Mace really crappy...

-_-

Only real threat here is Kit Fisto, and he lacks dueling skill due to shii-cho.

Right, because being hailed as a master of Makashi & Ataru, called a direct peer to Dooku's grace with the blade, regarded as one of the most cunning warriors of the order and considered to have "Legendary strength in the force". Doesn't make you a threat.

Originally posted by Marco1907
Did you really read RotS Novel ? And why Mace left Shaak Tİ at the temple while he took Saesee Tiin and Agen Kolar ?

Easy, she was charged with protecting the Temple along with Cin Drallig, she's lead the defense of other places, it only make sense she be left behind.

Kit Fisto > Saesee Tiin - Agen Kolar > Shaak Ti

That is all arguable , Neither Saesee Tiin nor Agen Kolar have any feats that put them above Shaak Ti.

And Starkiller is very very inconsistent and stupid character.

Perhaps, but before hand he was beating Rahm Kota and showcasing tremendous skill with Telekinesis on a highly destructive level.

Originally posted by Nalaniel
Shaak Ti > Savage

Deal with it.

👆

Originally posted by Emperordmb
At least Nala's posts will still be here by the end of the day 😉

I can't even argue Shaak Ti being more powerful than Savage Opress...... That's just dumb....

Originally posted by Marco1907
I can't even argue Shaak Ti being more powerful than Savage Opress...... That's just dumb....

Saying Vader is slow is just dumb.

Originally posted by Nalaniel
Saying Vader is slow is just dumb.

So do you think Kai Hudorra is dumb ? Or even George Lucas ?

You mean the Jedi who died 22 years before Vader's peak?

Originally posted by Marco1907
So do you think Kai Hudorra is dumb ? Or even George Lucas ?

Vader still killed him. 22 years before his prime.

Originally posted by Kurupt Homie
Still not true. And irrelevant to combat efficiency.

Thanks for providing proof that its not true and a well written counter-argument..

Oh wait! you didn't do anything so...Thank you for your concession.

Originally posted by Emperordmb
You mean the Jedi who died 22 years before Vader's peak?

Yeah, the same Jedi who had his hand severed by Vader before he (Hudorra) could react, and yet his claim that Vader is slow is supposed to be taken seriously 😆

Wow... So Vader has become super fast in his prime... He couldn't tag RotJ Luke though... And failed to beat Old Ben Kenobi... Or failed to tag alien bounty hunter with weird name...

Oldi-wan was still before his prime.

Originally posted by Kurupt Homie
I guess you're mad again. Even though I haven't talked Bane in, like, a month.

They always mad.

Shaak Ti makes this a stomp in the favor of the Council. Alone she'd give Maul a good fight, and likely take a number of fights, and if you think Savage can hold off 3 Council swordmasters...well you should probably stop posting on these boards.

Originally posted by Lord Stark
Alone she'd give Maul a good fight,

So Shaak Ti is beating Maul now ? 😂

Originally posted by Marco1907
So Shaak Ti is beating Maul now ? 😂

You must be the King of taking things out of context. He never said She would outright beat Maul, only that she'd give him a good fight and score a victory in a round or two. Is it really so bad to say that certain Jedi council members would give Maul a good fight?

Originally posted by Fated Xtasy
You must be the King of taking things out of context. He never said She would outright beat Maul, only that she'd give him a good fight and score a victory in a round or two. Is it really so bad to say that certain Jedi council members would give Maul a good fight?

Yes because Shaak Ti doesn't have any dueling feat to compare with prime Maul.

Since this is RotS Shaak Ti, she doesn't have that Starkiller feat as well.

Originally posted by Marco1907
Yes because Shaak Ti doesn't have any dueling feat to compare with prime Maul.

Since this is RotS Shaak Ti, she doesn't have that Starkiller feat as well.

Except you know, she took on an Army of Magna-guards, tanked Blows from electro staffs, deadlocked with eight Magna-guards which is a show of strength, broke the head off a Magna-Guard with her knee, survived a blaster shot to the chest and has so much hype as a duelist and a force user.

Tell me, why are you so eager to take OCW feats into account only where Shaak Ti is involved?

Originally posted by Fated Xtasy
Except you know, she took on an Army of Magna-guards, tanked Blows from electro staffs, deadlocked with eight Magna-guards which is a show of strength, broke the head off a Magna-Guard with her knee, survived a blaster shot to the chest and has so much hype as a duelist and a force user.

She only took an "army" of Magnaguards by using an electrostaff herself, which would give greater range to her attacks, and she was clearly losing before that. Still a good feat, just not that good, and it's not a showing of pure lightsaber prowess anyways.