9/11 would have never happened an infinitesimally-cheap infrastructure had been provided by the geo-industrial complex of our military's tech. We threw away trillions on weapons of war, all of that could have went to nasa or replacing fossil fuels. And it could have taken us to a moneyless, warless society capable of harnessing dark energy I'll bet.
9/11 was so obviously an inside job it's not even funny.
Originally posted by AstnerFor one, all of the countries are subject to the whims of madmen. Those who've engineered this modern economic system run the nations' officials outside their order, this intangible upper chain of command has been in place since the 50's.
Why would anyone outside of the USA care whether or not 9/11 was an inside job or not?
Originally posted by Bardock42Denial. Automatic, trained. You don't even know it.
I don't think it was an inside job.
America has a missile defense system designed to prevent thousands of nuclear detonations should nukes start flying. You're telling me we didn't have time to shoot down two unresponsive, far off-course planes?
The credentialed were not asked to investigate empirically (even though that's governmental policy), and when the scientific community did a full-investigation of ground zero their finds of nano-thermite residue were completely ignored. Many said scientists lost their positions.
Originally posted by Oneness
America has a missile defense system designed to prevent thousands of nuclear detonations should nukes start flying. You're telling me we didn't have time to shoot down two unresponsive, far off-course planes?
When it's not common for planes to be hijacked and turned into missiles, people don't just assume it's happening. eg 9/11 wouldn't have happened in Israel like it did, since they're prepared and expect it to happen.
Post 9/11 USA, I doubt a plane would be allowed to fly in the dark unimpeded for as long as those did.
Originally posted by RobtardYou're telling me if a plane loses communication and is obviously headed for a populated area while descending so as to land yet without decelerating they're not going to destroy it?
When it's not common for planes to be hijacked and turned into missiles, people don't just assume it's happening. eg 9/11 wouldn't have happened in Israel, since they're prepared and expect it to happen.Post 9/11, I doubt a plane would be allowed to fly in the dark unimpeded for as long as those did.
We need to seriously look at the rules, because militarily they don't play with hijacked planes, and they would have had a whole text of plans to be aware of a hijacking. There is no way in hell that they wouldn't have at least shot down the second plane.
You've got to be robtarded to assume that the only reason they didn't shoot down the second plane was because they were unsure it was going to do what the first plane did when they have the thing's location the whole Goddamn time it's air-born and can clearly see where it's going. Only Robtard.
Jesus, people like you are why they're still in power.
Originally posted by Oneness
You're telling me if a plane loses communication and is obviously headed for a populated area so as to land yet [b]without decelerating they're not going to destroy it?We need to seriously look at the rules, because militarily they don't play with hijacked planes, and they would have had a whole text of plans to be aware of a hijacking. There is no way in hell that they wouldn't have at least shot down the second plane.
You've got to be robtarded to assume that the only reason they didn't shoot down the second plane was because they were unsure it was going to do what the first plane did when they have the thing's location the whole Goddamn time it's air-born and can clearly see where it's going. Only Robtard.
Jesus, people like you are why they're still in power. [/B]
Now, after 9/11. Sure.
Okay. See below.
There was an 17-18min window between the 1st and 2nd plane. Like I said, the US was not prepared then. Granted, it was still incompetence all around, but assuming "inside job" because of incompetence is a stretch.
Okay.
Originally posted by Oneness
For one, all of the countries are subject to the whims of madmen. Those who've engineered this modern economic system run the nations' officials outside their order, this intangible upper chain of command has been in place since the 50's.
Again, they are either mad or there is some order among them, you can't have sort-of-lunatics pulling the string to keep the status quo.
Originally posted by BentleyYou seem to be mistaken in underestimating the human mind, in your disbelief you've rejected the fact that psychopathy is actually a cognitive stimulant as opposed to otherwise. Unreasonableness is just a way to get more of what you want out of people.
Again, they are either mad or there is some order among them, you can't have sort-of-lunatics pulling the string to keep the status quo.