US Navy Railgun Program

Originally posted by Robtard
Not being attacked puts a country off edge.

Do you really think load-bearing steel beams need to be melted down into slag before they fail? Or do you think it's possible they could be hit with a tremendous force and heated to weaken them just enough where they can no longer support the weight they're designed to support?

How did the nano-thermite get there?

Furthermore, how does a skyscraper collapsing right next to a building cause that building to collapse demolition style? It's not like there was an atomic burst coming from the collapse, and if there were the third tower's roof would have been blown off, it wouldn't have fallen straight down moments after the towers' collapse.

I mean, they even hit the pentagon with a plane. That building was even more protected than the WTC. Can you imagine how difficult it would be to fly an airliner straight ****ing down?

I don't see how a handful of people can death-star this kind of a chain reaction against our intelligence bureau, satellite surveillance, the air-force, and our entire missile defense system. It's ridiculous.

Originally posted by Oneness
The official report purportedly mentions nothing about the initial impact weakening the integrity of the structure.

How did the nano-thermite get there?

You don't think 250ish tons travelling at a high rate of speed slamming into a building can cause at least some structural integrity loss? That plus sustained heat = integrity loss. Though enough heat alone would do it too.

Nanothermites wouldn't shatter load-bearing steel beams.

Originally posted by Oneness
Furthermore, how does a skyscraper collapsing right next to a building cause that building to collapse demolition style? It's not like there was an atomic burst coming from the collapse, and if there were the third tower's roof would have been blown off, it wouldn't have fallen straight down moments after the towers' collapse.

I mean, they even hit the pentagon with a plane. That building was even more protected than the WTC. Can you imagine how difficult it would be to fly an airliner straight ****ing down?

I don't see how a handful of people can death-star this kind of a chain reaction against our intelligence bureau, satellite surveillance, the air-force, and our entire missile defense system. It's ridiculous.

Cos gravity goes down.

Where the **** is the plane?

YouTube video

Originally posted by Robtard
You don't think 250ish tons travelling at a high rate of speed slamming into a building can cause at least some structural integrity loss?

Nanothermites wouldn't shatter load-bearing steel beams.

They were made specifically as incendiaries, they're far hotter than a chemical fire.

The buckling of the slagged beams is what caused the shatter.

Originally posted by Oneness
Not enough to turn the beams into slag.

They were made specifically as incendiaries, they're far hotter than a chemical fire.

The buckling of the slagged beams is what caused the shatter.

As pointed out, load-bearing beams don't have to be turned into slag before they fail.

Nah.

Originally posted by Robtard
As pointed out, load-bearing beams don't have to be turned into slag before they fail.

According to you, the beams failed from kinetic force alone. That wasn't even in the falsified theory.

Originally posted by Oneness
There was literally an animation showing them turn into slag. I'm just saying, that's not possible. They never proved through demonstration, they never reproduced those conditions to the same effect. Thus, AE Truth did. Falsifying the official report.

According to you, the beams failed from kinetic force alone. That wasn't even in the falsified theory.

According to me the beams didn't fail from kinetic force alone:

Originally posted by Robtard
Do you really think load-bearing steel beams need to be melted down into slag before they fail? Or do you think it's possible they could be hit with a tremendous force and heated to weaken them just enough where they can no longer support the weight they're designed to support?

Originally posted by Robtard
According to me the beams didn't fail from kinetic force alone:

We're talking about 4 beams in which 250 tons at 200+ mph is a rock tossed at a metal filing cabinet.

They're not hollow, they're not going down or getting bent out of shape by the force of even a commercial airliner crashing directly into them.

See what they say about how pathetic the tungsten-carbide projectile launched from a rail-gun would be if it impacted the shaft of a hypothetical space-elevator constructed from carbon nano-tubes. Nothing.

The fact that they're lodged underground, the weight of the building, the reinforcement of the other beams, it's difficult to imagine anything short of a missile would do it. Even at that height.

Okay, you've convinced me.

Originally posted by Robtard
Okay, you've convinced me.

Secondly, I don't give a **** what you believe, I'm just relaying why the conspiracy theory is the more logical one.

Spoiler:
04/19/1993
04/17/147
09/11/1996

9+11+1996 or 4+19+1993 = 2016
4+17+747 = 768
2016/8 = 252
768/8 = 96
252 x 96 = 24192
24192/8 = 3024
2016 - 768 = 1248
3024 - 1248 = 1776
1776/2 = 888

Originally posted by Oneness
First of all, this is a very serious thing to me. So don't be a sarcastic **.

Secondly, I don't give a **** what you believe, I'm just relaying why the conspiracy theory is the more logical one.

Spoiler:
04/19/1993
04/17/147
09/11/1996

9+11+1996 or 4+19+1993 = 2016
4+17+747 = 768
2016/8 = 252
768/8 = 96
252 x 96 = 24192
24192/8 = 3024
2016 - 768 = 1248
3024 - 1248 = 1776
1776/2 = 888

2021 / 2 (two planes) = 1010.5 (rounded up = 1011), 1011 + 1 (one attack on the Pentagon) = 1012

1012 AD started on a Tuesday. 9/11 attacks happened on a Tuesday

Fatimid Caliph al-Hakim orders the destruction of all Jewish and Christian places of worship. ie a religious based attack.

Coincidence? I don't think so!

Your demonstrative methods of conveying why numerology is nothing but horse hockey, and why it's pointless to argue the validity of 9/11's official report are admirable, but mistaken.

Everyday you find these patterns, you can find them anywhere and find meaning in them.

What you don't realize is that you're looking for something that's waiting to find you.

Give into superstition, and you will find an immovable center. A release, as I have.

If it takes me places far and wide enough for my works to affect your life (in a positive way of course), you'll perhaps change your outlook.

Psychosis is a cognitive enhancer, it is a neurological stimulant. It surpasses meth, even. One can trip from meditation, one can hallucinate from meditation overtime. Psychosis generates too much or too little emotion; giving the mind speed, better access to memories. A legion of the sane are forever inferior to a legion of the psychotic.

Apophenia

Saw this thread had gotten 4 pages of discussion.

...should have known better than to hope it was actual discussion.

D'ohlos.

Originally posted by Robtard
Apophenia

You found the equally indicative patterns pertaining to that date, indicative of animosity.

Why is it only 4/19/93 and 9/11/96 though? Nothing else works, no other date, go ahead and try. It's not Apophenia because it's not meaningless, or it's no more meaningless than anything else in this world. Meaning is the outcome superstition, of subjectivity.

Humans were designed to be psychopaths. Preservation of one's own species via slaughtering and feeding upon other species to the point of their extinction, wasting away resources without a thought to them could be considered insane. The lengths one will go for love or survival, are all insane. Subjectivity is psychotic. It's a matter of how psychotic, of how much you can take. That's where my genius becomes pronounced, you can put me and another man through the same trauma and guess who's going to cope better? The one who's already lost himself more.