Originally posted by Stigma
I mean, people assert it and it's cool. But you have to admit that
pushing back Kenobi and Anakin, choking Dooku and Ventress simultaneously, pushing a spaceship of a cliff with one burst of TK all suggest otherwise.Savage's TK feats seem better than Bane's in DoE.
Savage also matched superior combatants than Bane did in DoE.
That's because some of the feats you mentioned (namely, chocking both Ventress and Dooku) are circumstancial, and even if they weren't they are inconsistent, especially because of how Dooku chocked Savage casually.
Originally posted by Nargaroth
That's because some of the feats you mentioned (namely, chocking both Ventress and Dooku) are circumstancial, and even if they weren't they are inconsistent, especially because of how Dooku chocked Savage casually.
Originally posted by Nargaroth
That's because some of the feats you mentioned (namely, chocking both Ventress and Dooku) are circumstancial, and even if they weren't they are inconsistent, especially because of how Dooku chocked Savage casually.
How is fighting evenly with Ventress circumstantial? And or any less circumstantial than Bane using a nexus to kill featless Kas'im, Bane utilizing a nexus to collapse portions of a badly ruined/semi-destroyed temple, Bane being amped to throw a big rock, Bane geing amped/covered in Orbalisks in practically all of his feats?
Originally posted by carthage
How is fighting evenly with Ventress circumstantial? And or any less circumstantial than Bane using a nexus to kill featless Kas'im, Bane utilizing a nexus to collapse portions of a badly ruined/semi-destroyed temple, Bane being amped to throw a big rock, Bane geing amped/covered in Orbalisks in practically all of his feats?
Read better, I said that some of them are circumstancial. Or, to be more precise, chocking Ventress and Dooku together is circumstancial, because they were very clearly distracted.
Originally posted by Nargaroth
Read better, I said that some of them are circumstancial. Or, to be more precise, chocking Ventress and Dooku together is circumstancial, because they were very clearly distracted.
I gathered that but all of Bane's force feats are far more particular in the manner/circumstances/setting in which they occurred more so than Savage. Even without bringing up choking Ventress/Dooku, Savage has superior TK feats to Bane regardless.
Originally posted by carthage
Bane wasn't even good enough to defeat his apprentice in an all out fight, in spite of Zannah being near featless as a duelist 😬
Can this same logic be applied to Plagueis and Sidious? Sidious had no feats prior to Darth Plagueis, no?
Plagueis, that pathetic example of a DLotS. Am I right?