DoE Bane vs. Savage Oppress

Originally posted by Vorpal Ruin
Can this same logic be applied to Plagueis and Sidious? Sidious had no feats prior to Darth Plagueis, no?

Plagueis, that pathetic example of a DLotS. Am I right?

Except that Luceno implied that Plagueis would outdo TPM Sidious in a duel. Sidious as of TPM had comparable skill feats like stomping Maul, so Im not sure what skill disparity exists between the two. Bane is all but useless as a lightsaber duelist, he's only ever beaten a featless trainee and fought evenly with Zannah whose only beaten a half trained Jedi knight. They arent even remotely top tier duelists

bump

Why did you bump this? Neph and DmB already proved Bane wins with their brilliant arguments

I thought that more praise for Bane can always be appreciated?

Spoiler:
After some time, I'm undecided who is better. Leaning towards bloodlusted Savage

Bane can just blitz Savage, we all know Rain drops >> force sensitives, Sirak >> Plo Koon/Ventress

Hmm that's a fairly strong and well-reasoned out argument. You probably borrowed it from Bane supporters, didn't you?

Not to mention who did Savage beat/matched? Plo Koon, Ventress, Kenobi. Ha. He has nothing on Bane. Bane is just too unpredictable.