If only Harry's magic can harm Voldermort (lolz, btw), why did Voldemort flee like a coward from Dumbledore and the incoming wizards when he had 14ish year old Potter at his mercy?
In fact, it seems like once VOldemort regained his body, he could have singlehandedly killed everyone since he's immune to all except Potter, according to some.
Originally posted by Silent Master
What are Tom's best durability feats?
Um, probably like not getting hurt physically when he's been hit with things that should kill him? Those moments Dadudemon mentioned seem pretty legit
Originally posted by Robtard
DDM implied it. But I know DDM is just being DDM to take the piss out of SM. So it's cool
Oh I thought DaDudemon's point was that there's no evidence that physical harm has ever come to Voldemort. Magic can hurt him or bind him because it's magic and he has been outdone by it before. But it sounds like no ones ever hit him physically and damaged him.
Isn't Voldemort's feat not being damaged by physical means? He's been hit with things physically and not taken damage, right? This isn't me stating facts, man. I'm asking for clarification and instead of clarifying youre asking me to elaborate on arguments I'm not stating.
Can someone else clear this up for me?
Originally posted by Quincy
Isn't Voldemort's feat not being damaged by physical means? He's been hit with things physically and not taken damage, right? This isn't me stating facts, man. I'm asking for clarification and instead of clarifying your asking questions around me.Can someone else clear this up for me?
I'm asking for durability feats, that means you list the attacks that Tom has actually taken with no damage. so far your best feat seems to be falling glass.
Do you have anything more impressive to list?
Originally posted by dadudemonJust concede the Voldemort is not damage-able unless it is from magic.
Edit - Just watched that scene with the fire. Volde is right in the middle of the flames after it is thrown back at him. Volde is turning off the flames. Dumble didn't let the flames get that close to him. Before Volde throws the flames at dumbles, the flame snake is literally, right there next to him (volde). A fire hot enough to melt metal and stone would cause Volde to catch fire, just standing next to it. That's silly of you to ignore that. Dumbledore kept the flames 10-20 feet away. Looks like volde turned off the flame stuff so he could see before he got hit again by Dumbles...which appears to be exactly what Dumbledore tried to do after throwing the flames back at Volde.
Guess what the flame was?
🙂
I figured this flame would count as "fire"
Originally posted by Quincy
I figured this flame would count as "fire"
Look at the vid, the fire at best was around him for a second or two, not even long enough to singe his clothes.
So you're saying his best durability feats are not being injured by falling glass, or short contact with fire(that wasn't even enough to damage clothes)?
Originally posted by Quincy
I'm saying I've never seen him injured by physical harm that wasn't magic. The movie and novels imply he can't be killed or harmed.Save for the prophecy that states The Chosen One (Harry Potter) is the only one with the ability to do so
So you agree that the two listed durability feats are the best Tom has, right?
Originally posted by Silent Master
Look at the vid, the fire at best was around him for a second or two, not even long enough to singe his clothes.So you're saying his best durability feats are not being injured by falling glass, or short contact with fire(that wasn't even enough to damage clothes)?
Well, you've kind of missed the point. Fiendfyre is the ultimate attack weapon. It can incinerate anything it comes into contact with including stone, metal, etc. It is, in fact, used to destroy a Horcrux. The only thing I can think of that resembles Fiendfyre in another universe is Naruto: Amaterasu.
In order for a fire to be hot enough to vaporize something like stone and metal, it has to be thousands of degrees. Indeed, we see that the melting point of stones is over 2500 F (depending on the stone, of course).
This is hotter than the lowest temperature that lava can still be liquid.
Since this is not just melting stuff, it incinerates the stuff, this is much hotter than simply the melting point of stone.
For Voldes to create that flame near his face and stand right next to it for a few moments before launching it at Dumbles and then to sit right in the middle of it for 1-2 seconds, as you state, that's absurd. His clothes would have violently burst into flames and his entire outer-flesh burned (and fallen off...ever see those gruesome pictures from Vietnam from the napalm victims?)
This is something much hotter than the hottest napalm and Voldes sat right in it, unscathed, for 1-2 seconds, according to you. 🙂
Keep in mind, you wanted evidence and I said every fight he's ever been in, there is something in the physical world that should have harmed him. HP seems to be the only one and that was while they were both flying around, in a half-aparated stated.
Originally posted by Quincy
I don't know man I dont think anyone is clear on whether or not he can be physically harmed. Could be
I take terms like "immortal" to be that. Voldemort is immortal. We know, because we saw the whole story, why the characters did not consider it perfect immortality. Since no person outside of demigods and fellow magical users, Voldemort is functionally immortal against any person he's matched up against as long as the Horcruxes are around.
My point is, people should stop using Voldes in vs. threads unless they specify "no horcruxes."
RJ has done that. I believe Placidity has done that. I think I've done that. It's not that hard to put that one single line into the OP.