LOL@GIA's pathetic attempts to confuse believers. Jesus existed long before His mother Mary did when He was known only as "The Word" not Jesus but He was still the same being regardless of what He was called. Mary was the mother of His flesh and blood self or in other words she was His mother only at the time He was human which was a very small portion of His existence.
Try harder, GIA. I guess your master (Satan) must be disappointed in you if that's the best you can do.
Originally posted by Star428
LOL@GIA's pathetic attempts to confuse believers. Jesus existed long before His mother Mary did when He was known only as "The Word" not Jesus but He was still the same being regardless of what He was called. Mary was the mother of His flesh and blood self or in other words she was His mother only at the time He was human which was a very small portion of His existence.Try harder, GIA. I guess your master (Satan) must be disappointed in you if that's the best you can do.
Satan doesn't exist, and turning the "Word" into Jesus is just silly.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Satan doesn't exist, and turning the "Word" into Jesus is just silly.
That's what it states in the Bible
Originally posted by Star428
Correction: A book written by humans who were inspired by God Himself. There. Fixed it for ya. No thanks are necessary. 🙂
The Koran is also written by humans who were inspired by God Himself. Why should I believe ether one? It is easy to say "this book was inspired by God", but that doesn't make it true.
People blame God for their problems when they should blame themselves. Every problem in my life I have ever had has been self induced.
Satan tricks you into thinking it's Gods fault.
Where people are decieved is they would rather believe Satans lies because they sound better then the truth which is people make their own problems.
Originally posted by Time Immemorial
People blame God for their problems when they should blame themselves. Every problem in my life I have ever had has been self induced.Satan tricks you into thinking it's Gods fault.
Where people are decieved is they would rather believe Satans lies because they sound better then the truth which is people make their own problems.
I don't think that is satan's fault. That wanting to blame god is your fault. People deceive themselves. A satan is not needed.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
The Koran is also written by humans who were inspired by God Himself. Why should I believe ether one? It is easy to say "this book was inspired by God", but that doesn't make it true.
But the Koran is -assumedly- more than written by humans, it's an aspect of the divinity. If they were both legit the Bible would be ridiculously outclassed by the Koran in rank according to their respective religions.
Originally posted by Bentley
But the Koran is -assumedly- more than written by humans, it's an aspect of the divinity. If they were both legit the Bible would be ridiculously outclassed by the Koran in rank according to their respective religions.
My point was that just because a book makes an unprovable claim, does not mean that claim is true. If something is unprovable, we should start with disbelief, until proof is presented.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
The fact that I realize that good and evil are not mutually exclusive is morally absolute? I don't think so.
You replied to the wrong part of my statement. I meant that evil as a noun is different that as an adjective, from then I implied that you weren't claiming that Hitler was absolute evil.
Originally posted by Bentley
You replied to the wrong part of my statement. I meant that evil as a noun is different that as an adjective, from then I implied that you weren't claiming that Hitler was absolute evil.
I actually don't believe that Hitler was evil, but everyone know what I am talking about. It is expedient means. I also use the word God, because most people don't know what the Mystic Law is.
Evil is a path; a set of choices. These choices could be good, but still lead to evil. And the opposite is also true. Each of the ten worlds has it's own path of good and evil, and because of the mutual manifestation of the ten worlds, we could be doing evil in one world while at the same time be doing good in another.
Good and evil like the faces of a coin do not describe the world we live in. It is a bad theory. The world we live in is far more complex. That is why I prefer the ten worlds.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
And the opposite is also true.
So you'd follow a pedophile, gotcha 😈
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Good and evil like the faces of a coin do not describe the world we live in. It is a bad theory. The world we live in is far more complex. That is why I prefer the ten worlds.
I agree that such theory is lacking, but that's not what they are claiming. You see, if evil or good are actions, then there is not an actual opposition because no action is the opposite of another action. The idea of two faces of a coin or that they are two different forces is not implied but refuted by the premise of evil being defined by good.
Originally posted by Greatest I am
And I see that you hypocritically wish to divert to my dislike of the poor judge you follow to debate on his setting and accepting a bribe to corrupt his judgement.You are a pathetic apologist who runs from moral debates while recognizing the poor morals you have embraced.
Regards
DL
that's the response of a "Gnostic Christian"? only idiots will believe that adding "Christian" to your Gnosticism is not a misnomer... Christians believe in God and Jesus, not badmouthing them... your belief is close to being an anti-Christ...
Originally posted by Greatest I am
To the Jews, God was androgynous, so made we them, male and female and called them Adam suits their androgynous beliefs. Many of the older Eastern God and the Christian God were thought to be androgynous.That is why Paul and Jesus say things like making women into men. That just means bring out the male nature that all women have or the female nature that all men have.
I have links if you do not agree.
Regards
DL
first, nobody says that the God is confined by gender... heck, God created gender!
next, nobody trusts your idiotic interpretations of the Bible... you are interpreting it literally, making Paul and Jesus misogynistic, then you scrap the entire idea as crap... making a big strawman fallacy and you think nobody sees that?
also, nobody cares about your links because if that's the belief of Gnosticism, then thanks but no thanks!
one can argue that my post is "filled with hate" again, but spewing hatred is entirely different with flatly telling the truth...
Originally posted by Bentley
So you'd follow a pedophile, gotcha 😈
Not funny!
Originally posted by Bentley
I agree that such theory is lacking, but that's not what they are claiming. You see, if evil or good are actions, then there is not an actual opposition because no action is the opposite of another action. The idea of two faces of a coin or that they are two different forces is not implied but refuted by the premise of evil being defined by good.
But good and evil can happen simultaneously.