Hercules vs Wonder Woman

Started by HulkIsHulk9 pages

Originally posted by thingy150
Same thing for you in the durability/strength argument.

Everybody ignore him from now on, he is currently trying to dispute mmh moving brainiacs ship with superman, want to know how he is trying to dispute it? By saying mmh durability is too low for him to move the ship.

He says strength and durability are always at the same level(whatever that means). I disproved this multiple times btw.


Obviously he doesn't know about Butterball who has only human level strength but top tier durability

Originally posted by riv6672
Marvel Hercules is stronger than WW. Thats a given. Not sure where the DC version lands; is CM stronger than WW?

People really need to re-think their assumptions that WW is second only to Superman. She just might not be.

As to the battle, its a close call, but i think Hercules wins on slightly less skill but more strength, with equal speed.


Herakles (obviously Dc) at one time was shown to be stronger than either Superman or Wonder Woman. He's pretty ruthless fighter too. And he has curbstomped Giganta as well.

Originally posted by pym-ftw
You need to accept that comics 99.999999...% are using real world science.

❌ No No No!

Originally posted by leonidas
lol at you 2. you're like an old married couple....

anyway, i'm as big a herc fan as there is on the forum but even i know diana would take this. if he's stronger (and i think he is) it is by a negligible amount. her speed advantage is huge. she is more skilled than he is, but the difference there is nowhere near as significant as the speed. and the weapon advantage. he could take a couple but she'd take him out far more often than not. maybe 8/10 diana.


Leo, the OP states equalized speed

Originally posted by pym-ftw
Do we honestly have to go through this on every debate?

Herc is hinted at being physically stronger than Thor.
Diana is weaker than Supes.

Thor is STRONGER than Supes, now whether it's a full 16x or not I don't care really but it's a tangible difference.

what drugs are you taking? Superman is a lot stronger than Thor. His feats are simply far better.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Hasn't Superman struggled with WW with far less than that iirc ?

Are you talking abou that aircraft?

Originally posted by krisblaze
The general statement is that he gets stronger the angrier he gets.

Not that he can get as strong as he wants. I take it you're not familiar with the traditional conflicts that take place in Hulk's comics.

Becoming stronger as you become angrier is not "unlimited" strength because of several reasons.

- There's no unlimited gamma energy.

- Even the emotional avatars are not unlimited.

- Hulk is not the TOAA.

- This hasn't been SHOWN in comics.


I has been also stated that his anger and strangth have no limits. The TOAA comparison is awefull as however strong Hulk or anyone gets they can't get even close to the omnipresent omniscient omnipotent creator of the Multiverse that's above all in it. And what you want to beleive has no hold on waht happens in a comics or anything related to the comic book characters

Originally posted by pym-ftw
You just contradicted your self in 1 post

Yes Hulk is infinitely strong

Or

No Hyperbole is nonsense.


Abhi never said that

Originally posted by HulkIsHulk
Are you talking abou that aircraft?

Thor was restrained by titanium like ropes recently.

😐

Originally posted by pym-ftw
🤓

You have to overcome the Suns gravity in order to move a planet... That constant is what gives the Earth weight or else the earth would be weightless.

Shattering an earth requires roughly the same force as dragging 16 earths, I'm sorry that that upsets you but it is truth.

oh I see now. Your science knowledge is phucked up.

Well let me tell you something. In the absence of the suns gravity, it would take 100 earth weights to accelerate the earth 100 times more than g.
Also it takes more force to accelerate the earth at g then to destroy it. That means it takes less than 1 earth weight of force to destroy the earth.

Originally posted by HulkIsHulk
An earth sized planet was coming at Earth at 5000 mph and Hyperion caught it
That's uh, really slow, lol. By comparison, the Earth travels at over 60,000 miles per hour in its orbit.

So if those are all the facts involved no, that probably isn't a planet busting feat. A bit less than a tenth of the energy required to bust a planet would have been sufficient to stop an Earth-sized mass traveling at 5,000 mph (assuming that this Earth-sized body is for some reason not subject to gravity).

It was 500000 mph actually.

Originally posted by h1a8
oh I see now. Your science knowledge is phucked up.

Well let me tell you something. In the absence of the suns gravity, it would take 100 earth weights to accelerate the earth 100 times more than g.
Also it takes more force to accelerate the earth at g then to destroy it. That means it takes less than 1 earth weight of force to destroy the earth.

are you talking about the 40% theory that has nothing to do with this thread and has to do with eradication of life on the earth?

Btw the earth was hit with another planet and they fuzed we know this already, it takes more than one planet to shatter a planet.

I reckon next, we should calculate the tensile strength of the bench that Superman sat on when he benched all those Earth weights.

Then calculate how much heat his muscles generated when doing it.

Then we can calculate the melting point of the shorts he was wearing/hair gel he was using, to withstand those temperatures.

I guess, we are not even arguing anything to do with superman's feat as a way to skirt the fact Thor's feat is more impressive.

It isn't. But don't let that stop you from harp that in every thread.

I hope your not responding to me

I am.

Originally posted by abhilegend
It was 500000 mph actually.
Then Hyperion's feat is far above planet busting. About five hundred times better, in fact.

^ So Hyperion with his fullest power punch would one-shot a planet 500x the size of Earth? Or would one-shot Earth with 1/500th the strength of his best shot?

Methinks these comics aren't meant to compute into such quantifications.