Originally posted by Reflassshh
Look at it carefully, Boardwalker, the robber shot multiple rounds before the sparkle of the fired bullets disappeared. Its a ftl+ feat, in fact.
Yeah he's faster than light, which is why he needs a car to get around right? I mean are you saying that Batman is as fast as the Flash? Only a moron would think that someone weaker, and heavier would be as fast as someone smaller, lighter, and much stronger. You have to use logic when it comes to these things.
Originally posted by Reflassshh
It's obvious I'm joking with the exaggeration present in some batman threads 😂
I know you were, because I'm sure that you realized that you can run 30 MPH and weave to avoid being hit by bullets fired by a nervous person. Batman was a moving target, which is harder to hit, and even if he were to be hit, he has Kevlar weave in his costume. He had that thug shook from the door, which increased his chances of missing. It really doesn't take a mental giant to figure out that Gamora would make Bruce look slow.
Look at when she hits Thanos multiple times. Thanos is the same guy that put his hand up before Mjolnir hit him, or when he stopped the Fallen one from making contact with him while moving far faster than a bullet. He was unable to tag Gamora even once while she danced around him scoring hit after hit.
It says that Gamora is 6 ft tall and weighs 170lbs. I disagree with this because Ben Grimm is 6 ft tall, and she was considerably shorter than he is. I would give her 5'6" - 5'7" weighing roughly between 130 - 170lbs due to musculature, and able to lift between 60-70 tons. But lets say that she is as large as the handbooks give her. She would still be far faster than Batman who is 6'1" and weighs in at 210-215lbs who lifts at max 2000lbs (I'm being very generous here).
Originally posted by Reflassshh
Look at the Batman vs Wesker thread. Bruce will always win despite being far weaker, slower and durable than his opponent. Just because he's de B4TGOD!!!
But in this case Gamora is just as skilled as he is if not more skilled. Wesker may not be as skilled as Batman which means everything when considering what kind of threats batman deals with. He would be in trouble from just attempting to block one of her hits. Just think about it, she knows how to throw a proper kick or punch to get the most out of it. One of her casual strikes would rip right through his bones if he attempted to block it. If the maximum weight that Gamora could lift were to be lowered onto Batman, he would burst like a bag of vomit. Bones wold be turned into paste, which shows that she is far more durable in just about every way. It's her skill that destroys him, because he has defeated characters stronger than she is, and perhaps even faster.
Originally posted by psycho gundam
I just attribute the Boom to the gunpowder but maybe that's just me
Modern gunpowder doesn't explode. It burns. Guns go "BANG" because the bullet leaves the barrel faster than the speed of sound. And the noise is both the pressure wave the bullet makes upon exiting the barrel and the act of air rapidly filling the empty space left behind by the bullet.
Originally posted by KingD19
Modern gunpowder doesn't explode. It burns. Guns go "BANG" because the bullet leaves the barrel faster than the speed of sound. And the noise is both the pressure wave the bullet makes upon exiting the barrel and the act of air rapidly filling the empty space left behind by the bullet.
👆
You'd be hit before ever hearing the bang.
Originally posted by KingD19But the point is that an arrow fired from a torque bow cannot produce that considering the mechanics of firing it. There is no muzzle to facilitate the sound effect
Modern gunpowder doesn't explode. It burns. Guns go "BANG" because the bullet leaves the barrel faster than the speed of sound. And the noise is both the pressure wave the bullet makes upon exiting the barrel and the act of air rapidly filling the empty space left behind by the bullet.
Originally posted by psycho gundam
You know I meant compound
Oh lol my bad. I really didn't know. I thought that you were talking about a Gears of War style torque bow. A compound bow still shoots out arrows far slower than a bullet, and arrows have a considerable amount of drag compared to a bullet, because of how they are made or engineered. Google it if you don't believe me. A bullet travels far faster.
Originally posted by Prof. T.C McAbe
Batman beats Gamora without the sword. He is more skilled and faced worse. He went toe to toe with Gamoras superior, KK.
That's just your opinion. Gamora would beat anyone that Batman could physically defeat while using skill. He is not more skilled than she is, while he is far weaker in every regard. He needs to stay down there in his tier. Too slow too weak, less durable equally skilled. He loses.
Originally posted by Reflassshh
Look at it carefully, Boardwalker, the robber shot multiple rounds before the sparkle of the fired bullets disappeared. Its a ftl+ feat, in fact.
Muzzle flash for handguns occurs at a speed of 1050 frames per second, the dissipation rate for the muzzle flash is about .01 seconds for a handgun from start to finish.The enemy in question who fired at Batman was able to produce 5 shots of which none have yet to begin dissipating. This means 5 shots were produced within .01 seconds, this is because dissipation has not started for the first shot fired.
Furthermore we know that the average speed of a handgun round is 2500 feet per second, and the picture shows that 4 of the bullets made contact with the wall. So we can conclude that the distance from the barrel to the wall was 2500x.01 which comes out to 25 feet per .01 of a second.
Thus 5 bullets were within .01 of a second of which each was traveling at a speed of 25 feet per .01 second. Batman dodged 5 shots at point blank, meaning he accelerated beyond a speed of 25^5 feet per .01 second AKA 9,765,625 feet per .01 second.
Batman absolutely out classes Gamora in combat speed, reaction speed, and close quarters acceleration speed.
Originally posted by KingD19
Because clearly the artist can show a gunshot without showing the flash. And said flash can dissipate on panel.It's even more obvious now that you just comprehend art in your own way. Usually wrong.
No, it is clear you understand nothing about chemical combustion and or the physics of relative speed with distance.
The pictures where a gunshot is shown without a flash means the character perceiving it was too slow to process the speed of it, or it had already passed relative to the speed capacity of the character.