Obama is America's best contemporary president (economically)

Started by Omega Vision3 pages

Originally posted by dadudemon
As a white, American Citizen, Male, who owns property (constitutionally, I am a highly qualified resident of the US) I think Obama is worse than Bush only because Bush didn't lie about being a warmongerer.

Tried to find a quote where Bush admitted to being a warmonger.

Google failed me.

Obama's actually been rather consistent when it comes to military matters. In his acceptance speech at the Nobel Award Ceremony near the beginning of his term, he made no bones about his belief that America has a duty to use military force to make the world a better place. In his words "Hitler wouldn't have been stopped with a peace movement."

No one paid attention to it because the headline was "Obama wins the Nobel Peace Prize." And now people are surprised that we're just as involved in the Middle East as we were under Bush.

Originally posted by Robtard
Very odd thing to say, especially the first part.

You're either joking or you are not familiar with both US History and the US Constitution (my assumption is you're joking, just as I was, because you're far too familiar with history to forget how voting was in the nascent US).

When the Constitution was written, only white male property owners (about 10 to 16 percent of the nation's population) had the vote.

http://www.infoplease.com/timelines/voting.html

Originally posted by Robtard
The Obama lying/warmonger is arguable.

Not even the informed US liberals/Dems believe what you're saying, here. Since I almost voted for him solely for his war-related promises/campaign promises (2008), I think that his lies about his warmongering hits a sore spot with me (since, at the time, I had 2 god-brothers serving in Iraq). When he continued down his war-path, I was already used to the idea that he was going to continue to lie about the war stuff. Remember the Gitmo promise? I do.

"We are bringing our troops home from Afghanistan. And I've set a timetable. We will have them all out of there by 2014"

-Obama circa 2012

YouTube video

While Obama is fond of taking credit for ending the war in Iraq, in fact, the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) under which all U.S. combat troops were withdrawn at the end of 2011 was signed on November 17, 2008, under the Bush administration. Obama was critical of the SOFA, his publicly stated position being that the troops should be withdrawn sooner. “In contrast,” the New York Times noted at the time, “President-elect Obama had campaigned under a promise to withdraw all American combat brigades from Iraq by May 2010”.

Obama not only did not keep that promise, but his administration sought since as early as September 2010 to obtain a new agreement with Iraq under which 15,000 to 20,000 combat troops would remain beyond the deadline at the end of 2011; but “Obama insisted that it could only happen if Maliki requested it”, wrote investigative historian and journalist Gareth Porter, since the White House “was worried about losing support from the Democratic Party’s anti-war base as Congressional mid-term elections approached”. The Wall Street Journal similarly pointed out that “Mr. Obama could face a political backlash at home if he doesn’t meet his campaign pledge to bring troops home from Iraq”, and by April 2011, the U.S. had dropped the number of troops it sought to keep in Iraq down to 10,000. The discussions over a new agreement “face political obstacles in both countries,” the Journal also noted, “and have faltered in recent weeks because of Iraqi worries that a continued U.S. military presence could fuel sectarian tension and lead to protests similar to those sweeping other Arab countries”.

As the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, a U.K.-based non-profit, details on its website, five years ago the CIA conducted the first drone strikes of the Obama presidency. Although there were reports of suspected "militants" killed, at least 14 civilians also died that day.

After those initial mistakes, TBIJ notes, Obama rapidly ramped up the drone program in Pakistan and increased its use in Yemen and Somalia, two countries where al Qaeda affiliates expanded their presence during Obama's presidency.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/23/obama-drone-program-anniversary_n_4654825.html

And to make it clear how active our troops are:

Deaths by Time Period: Bush
2001-2008 564
Jan 1-19 2009 11
Bush Total: 575

Deaths by Time Period: Obama:
2009 - 2014
Obama Total: 1726

http://icasualties.org/

It is not debatable that Obama lied about his warmongering. This is basic logic.

Of course, you could just be trolling here, too, and just wanted me to reply with a fact-based reply because you agreed with me. It is difficult to tell with you and others, these days, because no one seems to be serious anymore.

I am totally serial constantly, yo

Originally posted by dadudemon
You're either joking or you are not familiar with both US History and the US Constitution (my assumption is you're joking, just as I was, because you're far too familiar with history to forget how voting was in the nascent US).

http://www.infoplease.com/timelines/voting.html

Not even the informed US liberals/Dems believe what you're saying, here. Since I almost voted for him solely for his war-related promises/campaign promises (2008), I think that his lies about his warmongering hits a sore spot with me (since, at the time, I had 2 god-brothers serving in Iraq). When he continued down his war-path, I was already used to the idea that he was going to continue to lie about the war stuff. Remember the Gitmo promise? I do.

"We are bringing our troops home from Afghanistan. And I've set a timetable. We will have them all out of there by 2014"

-Obama circa 2012

YouTube video

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/23/obama-drone-program-anniversary_n_4654825.html

And to make it clear how active our troops are:

Deaths by Time Period: Bush
2001-2008 564
Jan 1-19 2009 11
[b]Bush Total: 575

Deaths by Time Period: Obama:
2009 - 2014
Obama Total: 1726

http://icasualties.org/

It is not debatable that Obama lied about his warmongering. This is basic logic.

Of course, you could just be trolling here, too, and just wanted me to reply with a fact-based reply because you agreed with me. It is difficult to tell with you and others, these days, because no one seems to be serious anymore. [/B]

I do remember Gitmo and I do remember him trying to extend the Iraq withdrawal timetable that was set under Bush, as I've criticized Obama for both in here in the past. My wording was wrong though, was in regards to Obama being worse than Bush, as I still think the BS the war was sold on is the greater sin

Originally posted by Robtard
I do remember Gitmo and I do remember him trying to extend the Iraq withdrawal timetable that was set under Bush, as I've criticized Obama for both in here in the past.

1. You are definitely understating Obama's role in the warmongering.
2. Good, I'm glad you're not one of those people that thinks Obama is barely at fault for everything and that it's always the fault of the GOP.

Originally posted by Robtard
My wording was wrong though, was in regards to Obama being worse than Bush, as I still think the BS the war was sold on is the greater sin.

I can't disagree that doing the war, to begin with, was definitely the greater sin.

Originally posted by dadudemon
1. You are definitely understating Obama's role in the warmongering.
Yes and no. I realize that the views and dreams he had before taking office probably got a massively unrelenting slap-of-reality after he took on the mantle of POTUS when he was faced with information on how things actually are/work.

Now that doesn't excuse that he has taken a dump on the people who voted him in by not keeping certain promises, but being pragmatic after the fact is just that.

Rob its christmas eve, close your trap and go enjoy the day in the bay area.

Just having a friendly discussion with DDM cos all my shopping is done, brah. Maybe it's you who should be enjoying yourself instead of bitching at me?

Originally posted by Robtard
Just having a friendly discussion with DDM cos all my shopping is done, brah. Maybe it's you who should be enjoying yourself instead of bitching at me?

Im joking🙂 Merry Christmas btw

Merry Christmas to you 👆

Im right wing and i hate that everyone was laughing at bush cos he sent nucular weapons to iraq. Imma hate obama as worst pres evar cos im not butthurt.

I like being told what doctors i can and cant visit so yeah, i'm all about big bama

Originally posted by Lestov16
http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhartung/2014/09/05/obama-outperforms-reagan-on-jobs-growth-and-investing/

What is your response to this, TI?

Not remotely surprising. He got handed the worst situation, and was able to do the most about it, and didn't go for any of the 'trickle down' BS that we now know doesn't work well.

If his hands weren't tied so much later on by the obstructionists in congress, he'd be better still.

Originally posted by jinXed by JaNx
I like being told what doctors i can and cant visit so yeah, i'm all about big bama

You do realize your insurance company already told you what doctors to use, right....?

And something like *30 million* more Americans have coverage now?

And before Obamacare, America was paying twice as much in taxes for health care than any other country, in exchange for worse coverage (most countries have 100%) and the 'honor' of having to pay expensive bills.

Wider health care is, frankly, superior. Obamacare's a step up from what we had before, though a step down from true universal- and by that, I mean in both cost and care provided.

In my opinion President Obama, is the best contemporary president, I would go as far as to say that he may be the best president ever. He said many things, and stuck by those things, while others simply could not happen based on opposition that he has met with throughout his tenure. I would vote for him again if I could, because he sure as hell beats any other candidate for the job at this time. Imagine Chris Christie as president? Well he's probably going to be the next one in, and it makes no sense... Not when we have a better person for the job, doing the job right now. The Presidency is a job. If you're doing a good job, why should you be fired is the way that I'm looking at it. Instead, we'll likely get an overindulgent prick, in a time that we sorely need a sensible leader.