Originally posted by ILS
There is still some merit to nexus feats. Like, Ahsoka Tano wouldn't be replicating Bane's Temple feat even if she had the same nexus. If one can figure out how much a nexus helps a feat, roughly speaking or precisely, and without bias, you can begin to quantify how powerful that character is. At least enough to say that Bane is > _______, even if you don't have his TK down to an exact number.
That actually isnt a bad way to look at it.
Perhaps a thread on nexus' would help find consensus on the matter and help people understand how much the nexus' boost a character or whether they should be taken into account or not unless the author states that the character was strengthened by it while pulling off a feat.
As it is now, we have one camp who devoutly pass Bane's nexus amplifications off as either negligible or nigh-negligible, and then there's the camp that refuses to see any merit in Bane's nexus feats because he was amped in any fashion. Neither interpretation works.
I thought you were amongst the latter?