Originally posted by Silent Master
You keep forgetting that Lang was ko'd in 3 rounds by Rocky level hits, whereas Rocky took 15 rounds of Drago level hits and Drago > Rocky in punching power.Thus Rocky has the better durability feat.
You're forgetting Rocky's hits only had any effect after Lang was already dog tired. He wore himself out and thus his ability to take punches was diminished.
Originally posted by juggerman
I watched the video but I'm not sure what you're talking about. You mistakenly put "1:98". Lemme know when you want me to start from and I'll give you an assessment
He had no point in posting this other than owning himself. At NO POINT in any of that video no matter where you start was Rocky "tanking" Lang's hit directly to the face without blocking. It didn't happen. Yet, we know for a fact he tanked Drago's hit DIRECTLY to the face without blocking or trying to evade them. This was after he learned the benefit to doing so. He still felt like nah, I can take them, and guess what he did.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Which fighter withstood more damage, Rocky after 15 rounds with Drago or Lang after 3 rounds with Rocky?
First, I never claimed who had better durability between Lang or Drago so that isn't my argument. What's my argument is this assumption that Drago hit harder than Lang, when the majority of proof and facts say otherwise
Originally posted by Robtard
And you still haven't read MVF rule #2, wiki is allowed and since this is the MVF, it's kosher 🙂
I never said it wasn't allowed. Putting words in my mouth again eh Tardo? Should I ask you to quote me where I said it wasn't allowed on here? Your reading comprehension is atrocious... What I'm saying is, whether it's allowed or not, doesn't make it a good source. Are you still not grasping this concept. Now answer my questions
Where those official primary sources from the movie?
Do you even know what a primary source is?
If you do know what it is, is it better to use than a secondary or wiki?
Originally posted by juggerman
It's not quite that simple tho. Rocky is able to go at full pace longer than Lang. Once Lang gets tired, his durability seemingly plummets
Why even try and explain this to them... They believe Fatigue has nothing to do with being knocked down or that it can't decrease your punch resistance. They've never competed in any sport at any level, if they did, they would understand that fatigue can play a role in being Knocked down... not jumping as high... not blocking as well.. etc etc.
It's funny how Lestov goes... Rocky ran up mountains and not steps as proof of Rocky's increased durability. I mean how dumb can you be. Not only are you assuming your own conclusion but it's a horrific attempt on your part to even do that. Not only was it never shown or even implied Rocky's limits in the first 3 movies was running up stairs... he never attempted more so we don't know if he could or couldn't. What's worse, and this is plain retarded on your part. If you had any boxing experience you would know that road work or climbing has NOTHING to do with durability and everything to do with Stamina and endurance. I mean it's hilarious... Think about this...
Prove Rocky was more durable in 4 than 3... HAHHA that's easy... Rocky ran up mountains instead of steps!!!! WTF!! You might be dumber than Robbie.
Originally posted by juggerman
Drago has much better endurance. He can still go when tired. Lang can't
Because he far more physically built and logically far stronger, which is supported by screenfeats. Again, if you want to prove Clubber is strong enough that after numerous rounds with The Stallion, he could still lift a man one handed and throw him like Drago did, you are going to have to prove that....or concede that Drago is stronger.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
He had no point in posting this other than owning himself. At NO POINT in any of that video no matter where you start was Rocky "tanking" Lang's hit directly to the face without blocking. It didn't happen. Yet, we know for a fact he tanked Drago's hit DIRECTLY to the face without blocking or trying to evade them. This was after he learned the benefit to doing so. He still felt like nah, I can take them, and guess what he did.
More strawmany goodness, I really worked you up 🙂
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
It's funny how Lestov goes... Rocky ran up mountains and not steps as proof of Rocky's increased durability. I mean how dumb can you be. Not only are you assuming your own conclusion but it's a horrific attempt on your part to even do that. Not only was it never shown or even implied Rocky's limits in the first 3 movies was running up stairs... he never attempted more so we don't know if he could or couldn't. What's worse, and this is plain retarded on your part. If you had any boxing experience you would know that road work or climbing has NOTHING to do with durability and everything to do with Stamina and endurance. I mean it's hilarious... Think about this...Prove Rocky was more durable in 4 than 3... HAHHA that's easy... Rocky ran up mountains instead of steps!!!! WTF!! You might be dumber than Robbie.
Did you actually see the Rocky movies, or are you debating off of Google knowledge? Because you clearly didn't see the training montage in 4.
Originally posted by Lestov16
Did you actually see the Rocky movies, or are you debating off of Google knowledge? Because you clearly didn't see the training montage in 4.
MORON, I asked you to prove he was more durable. YOU, not me YOU, came back with... he ran up mountains and not steps!! That is YOUR proof for Rocky's increased durability. NOW, you're claiming the entire training montage is the proof. Move the goalposts much? Are do you feel stupid now claiming climbing up mountains increased his durability