Spiderman returning in an MCU film.

Started by One_Angry_Scot11 pages

Spiderman returning in an MCU film.

From the Hollywood reporter.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/spider-man-swings-marvel-studios-772127

I know it was already mentioned in another thread but I thought to have some centralized discussion in this thread would be good.

Spider-Man looks to be appearing in the Captain America: Civil War film.

http://uk.ign.com/articles/2015/02/10/sinister-six-delayed-at-sony-spider-man-to-appear-in-captain-america-civil-war

Originally posted by One_Angry_Scot
Spider-Man looks to be appearing in the Captain America: Civil War film.

http://uk.ign.com/articles/2015/02/10/sinister-six-delayed-at-sony-spider-man-to-appear-in-captain-america-civil-war

Sinister Six movie still going ahead? That's strange, seen as TASM2 set up SS, and yet the TASM series is being rebooted.

Garfield replaced, thank God...

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Sinister Six movie still going ahead? That's strange, seen as TASM2 set up SS, and yet the TASM series is being rebooted.

From what I read in an article was that Sony still has the rights to Spider-Man, in the sense that they can govern what happens to Spider-Man in a film if it's something they don't like. Marvel just gets the benefit of allowing to have him appear in a film.

Originally posted by One_Angry_Scot
From what I read in an article was that Sony still has the rights to Spider-Man, in the sense that they can govern what happens to Spider-Man in a film if it's something they don't like. Marvel just gets the benefit of allowing to have him appear in a film.

Yeah but it's a shared Universe between them now. That alone means there will have to be major collaboration between the studios in everything they do.

I mean Sony can't have the Sinister Six destroying New York without discussing with Marvel what that will mean for the MCU.

Similarly Marvel can't have Spider-Man revealing his secret identity to the world in Civil War without discussing with Sony what that would mean for their Solo Spider-Man movies.

So we're going to have two different Spidey's on the bigscreen?

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Yeah but it's a shared Universe between them now. That alone means there will have to be major collaboration between the studios in everything they do.

I mean Sony can't have the Sinister Six destroying New York without discussing with Marvel what that will mean for the MCU.

Similarly Marvel can't have Spider-Man revealing his secret identity to the world in Civil War without discussing with Sony what that would mean for their Solo Spider-Man movies.

And I am just sitting here waiting for a Sentry film or appearance...

But yeah who do you want to see playing Spider-Man?

Originally posted by juggernaut74
So we're going to have two different Spidey's on the bigscreen?

No just the one. Garfield is out.

Originally posted by One_Angry_Scot

But yeah who do you want to see playing Spider-Man?

Honestly not thought about it. I loved Garfield in the role but am more than happy to have him leave for Spider-Man to be in the MCU.

As long as it's a half decent actor I'm not bothered. Because once he puts that mask on Spidey is Spidey whoever plays him. But I do hope he keeps the cocky sense of humor Garfield had. That is how Spidey is in the comics anyway.

I hated Garfield, TBH. Glad we're getting a new one.

AMC movie talk segment.

YouTube video

if anyone whether it be internet trolls or not want someone hired to be of old age, think again, the actor hired will be someone younger than that sorry ass Garfield was

http://www.superherohype.com/news/329567-get-ready-for-a-much-younger-spider-man

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
if anyone whether it be internet trolls or not want someone hired to be of old age, think again, the actor hired will be someone younger than that sorry ass Garfield was

http://www.superherohype.com/news/329567-get-ready-for-a-much-younger-spider-man

This article as well is saying Sinister Six and Female Spider related movies still happening. I don't get that.

I still think Marvel & Disney could have waited Sony out, and eventually gotten the rights free and clear. The latter was the desperate party here; the MCU is the biggest franchise going right now. They don't need to do favours for a rival.

I guess they really care about old Webhead...

Originally posted by roughrider

I guess they really care about old Webhead...

Of course they do. He's always been Marvel's Poster Boy. It would be like Dc not being able to use Superman or Batman. Although that probably aided Marvel in its Mega success with smaller properties.

It wasn't about financial need/greed for them at this point. It was the sentiment of being able to use their No.1 Icon. It was about fan satisfaction. The fans who used to buy those Marvel comics to see Spider-Man team up with the Avengers.

And as far as I can tell they haven't invested much(if any) financial risk in this deal.

Originally posted by Golgo13

AMC movie talk segment.

YouTube video

Man that was a seriously boring analysis of the biggest Superhero movie news since the announcement of Batman vs Superman.

Where the heck was Kristian Harloff?

So psyched about this! My favorite Marvel character aside from Hulk and Wolverine interacting with the likes of Thor, Hulk, and possibly GOTG. Good news all around.

Can you guys imagine the mark out moment when Spidey shows up in the Iron spider armor.

I hope he's in Avengers 3 along with the Netflix guys.

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
This article as well is saying Sinister Six and Female Spider related movies still happening. I don't get that.

i don't either but i guess its all part of the deal

The only Female spidey film I think would be cool is Spider-gwen.