^ Yeah they're not going to waste time on Spider-Man's origin. It will either be an after credit scene in Avengers 2 (probably too late for that) or Ant-Man, or it will be ignored in Cap and done as an intro scene in the next Spider-Man movie.
As long as they call him Peter Parker, there's no need to explain who he is in Cap3. Because we all know who Parker/Spider-Man is. Just like they don't need to explain to us who Batman/Bruce Wayne is in Batman V Superman.
If however it was Miles Morales, then people would be confused, and then a detailed explanation would be required.
Also I expect Spider-Man to have an Important role in Civil War (just like he did in the comics) but I don't expect him to have much screen time in it. And if he does, then he will probably just be replacing what was initially Black Panther's role in the film, so it wouldn't change much about the film itself, or take anything away from Cap. But it will make it an even more anticipated/hyped up movie.
Originally posted by ODGThey should just make a Spider-Man/Hulk movie if they really wanted to use Peter Parker so bad.
That would be sweet. But a duo movie might be difficult under their contract with Sony. Either Sony does a Spider-Man movie with Hulk appearing in it, or Marvel do a Hulk movie with Spider-Man appearing in that. But a proper duo movie like Batman V Superman or Civil War just wouldn't work under their agreement (I don't think).