Originally posted by relentless1
😂dont be daft, Blade is a tonner, Cap is an enhanced human; less tha half of that so give your head a shake before you speak bud
Read a book you lunatic, the days of peak>enhanced>meta>super are all but gone, and some characters blur the line. Cap is one of these characters, he's got shit load of +tonner feats, he is certified. For ****sake he CURLS 1000lbs, whens the last time your Curl exceeded your bench?
I don't know how you think comic vs boards operate, but reading the description of what a character can do off the back of a card is NOT an accurate way to gauge his abilities. If a character has been lifting +1 ton for 20 years and can currently do so, he's a tonner, it doesn't matter what their 'label' is at marvel HQ. Comic feats > character bios, always has been.
Originally posted by abhilegendStrength is ambiguous in this case. Both of them have feats that put them well over what they should be (i.e., Blade restraining then lifting a demon god larger than an elephant, tearing off a vampires head with one hand). Strength isn't going to be a difference maker in this fight since neither of them really grapple all that much. The thing with this fight is that Cap and Blade could be completely equal in all stats, and the fight would go to Blade purely because of his healing and his weaponry.
Wut? Are we counting out years worth of feats because of the description of Cap's powers?facepalm