2016 Presidencial Race

Started by Time Immemorial30 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
The last time a Clinton sat in office the country was in a pretty good state financially.

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/02/the-budget-and-deficit-under-clinton/

But let us forget all that and focus on Clinton getting a rimjob in the Oval from an intern. You know, the important stuff 👆

Ok financially he did ok, but he basically gave two shits about Al Queda and Bin Laden, and soon after he left office, 9/11 happened. USS Cole happened and he didn't do anything.

All I remember he saying was his famous "I could have killed Osama Bin Laden" phallacio speech..

Originally posted by Lestov16
Instead of saying **** Hilary, you should say **** the GOP for FUBARing their image out of spiteful Obama hate to the point that they can't offer up a credible opponent to Hilary. Don't hate the player.

👆

The fact that there really is not solid candidate other than Hillary (from any party) makes you correct. GOP done did **** up.

Originally posted by dadudemon
👆

The fact that there really is not solid candidate other than Hillary (from any party) makes you correct. GOP done did **** up.

Agreed, see they have ****ed up for the past two elections.

Originally posted by Surtur
Am I the only one finding myself indifferent to this upcoming race and not really caring on the outcome? Which is weird, since I'm not one of those people who always never really cares about the outcome of elections.

But we should care, the less people care, the less rights we have, and the more we lose.

The theory of "let Washington handle it" does not work.

Just because you vote for someone does not mean that person is going to return the favor.

The vote a person casts for their candidate assures them nothing because it cost them nothing, however that vote cost the candidate a lot in the form of promises that they now have in the form of a IOU to the people who fund there campaign.

This is why we must not elect Hilary, her campaign is fiddled with foriegn and illegal campaign donations.

The concept of "well the GOP doesn't have anyone better" is a lame excuse.

You can do two things, not vote, or write yourself in the box for president or whoever you want.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
But we should care, the less people care, the less rights we have, and the more we lose.

The theory of "let Washington handle it" does not work.

Just because you vote for someone does not mean that person is going to return the favor.

The vote a person casts for their candidate assures them nothing because it cost them nothing, however that vote cost the candidate a lot in the form of promises that they now have in the form of a IOU to the people who fund there campaign.

This is why we must not elect Hilary, her campaign is fiddled with foriegn and illegal campaign donations.

The concept of "well the GOP doesn't have anyone better" is a lame excuse.

You can do two things, not vote, or write yourself in the box for president or whoever you want.

That's the weird thing for me, the way our government has been acting..it should make people want change, and care about the election. But I can't help but feel burned out by it. I will still vote though(and not a write in vote).

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Ok financially he did ok, but he basically gave two shits about Al Queda and Bin Laden, and soon after he left office, 9/11 happened. USS Cole happened and he didn't do anything.

All I remember he saying was his famous "I could have killed Osama Bin Laden" phallacio speech..

IIRC, the conclusive evidence of the who-done-it for the USS Cole attack didn't come to light until after Clinton left office. But yeah, that one was foul-up regardless.

LoL, are you blaming 9/11 on Clinton? Cos that didn't happen under his watch.

Don't worry though, just like Obama, should H. Clinton win she'll be under pressure to not be spineless and she'll likely not hesitate to order attacks on terrorist to the point that Obama will look and say "Damn, girl, you make me look reserved."

Originally posted by Surtur
That's the weird thing for me, the way our government has been acting..it should make people want change, and care about the election. But I can't help but feel burned out by it. I will still vote though(and not a write in vote).

What I see is a Washington full of empty coats for sale to the highest bidder.

Originally posted by Robtard
IIRC, the conclusive evidence of the who-done-it for the USS Cole attack didn't come to light until after Clinton left office. But yeah, that one was foul-up regardless.

Don't worry though, just like Obama, should H. Clinton win she'll be under pressure to not be spineless and she'll likely won't hesitate to order attacks on terrorist to the point that Obama will look and say "Damn, girl, you make me look reserved."

Regardless, Clinton did nothing to stop the spreading of Al Queda.

We knew they were a problem based on many terrorist attacks, including first WTC bombing.

Do you know why Clinton didn't kill Osama?

Originally posted by Robtard
IIRC, the conclusive evidence of the who-done-it for the USS Cole attack didn't come to light until after Clinton left office. But yeah, that one was foul-up regardless.

LoL, are you blaming 9/11 on Clinton? Cos that didn't happen under his watch.

Don't worry though, just like Obama, should H. Clinton win she'll be under pressure to not be spineless and she'll likely not hesitate to order attacks on terrorist to the point that Obama will look and say "Damn, girl, you make me look reserved."

Well what is wrong with ordering attacks on terrorists? Or do you mean she'll be jumping the gun and attacking people she thinks are terrorists without having proper evidence they are terrorists?

No. That she won't be what Bill Clinton is perceived to be by some, a spineless lover of terrorist.

Originally posted by Robtard
Do you know why Clinton didn't kill Osama?

Yes cause he said there was women and children in one situation, but everyone knows he had many times and opportunities to kill him, they knew where he was the whole time.

Over 300 collateral casualties would have occurred.

Which were the other times?

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Look the GOP is lame and can't do anything.

Again Lest you are tied up in "Look what the GOP did!!!", when you should be concerned about a money fraud being elected president and having both Clintons back in the white house.

Have you seen me once saying anything good about the GOP in this thread?

Crying about the inevitable means jack shit if you can't offer up a better alternative.

Originally posted by Robtard
Over 300 collateral casualties would have occurred.

Which were the other times?

I don't buy they had only one time..but thats my opinion.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Crying about the inevitable means jack shit if you can't offer up a better alternative.

So you just say fck it and vote for her..

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
So you just say fck it and vote for her..

Unless you can materialize a better candidate out of thin air.....yeah. The choice is her or a Republican, and based on their track record of desiring to phuck the American public over for their own goals to the point of holding the US economy hostage like some kind of James Bond villain, Hilary definitely seems to be the better choice.

there are scenarios in life where you can't get the perfect thing that you want. You don't cry about it. You settle and make the best of what you have or try to come up with a practical alternative. You are doing neither.

Originally posted by Lestov16

there are scenarios in life where you can't get the perfect thing that you want. You don't cry about it. You settle and make the best of what you have or try to come up with a practical alternative. You are doing neither.


This explains every Republican nominee since after Reagan.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Unless you can materialize a better candidate out of thin air.....yeah. The choice is her or a Republican, and based on their track record of desiring to phuck the American public over for their own goals to the point of holding the US economy hostage like some kind of James Bond villain, Hilary definitely seems to be the better choice.

there are scenarios in life where you can't get the perfect thing that you want. You don't cry about it. You settle and make the best of what you have or try to come up with a practical alternative. You are doing neither.

The right candidate for me to vote for has not materialized yet, We are still a year out. Im not crying about anything. I'm saying its absurd to vote for her. You have not even seen the rest of the reveals.

I think I'm just gonna vote for Obama.