Originally posted by psmith81992
So does Ragnos, as well as a century worth of rule.
Originally posted by Trocity
English isn't your first language?Yeah, you did a way better job of learning it.
I learned Norwegian simultaneously. I ended up speaking later than most due to my parents each speaking to me in a different language (so I knew both). I had pretty much caught up with other kids by age 2, and t that point spoke both languages as well as they spoke one.
👆
Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Well: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f6/t595436.html
I am well aware of Hord's feats as I have played the game in its entirety. And yes, he has more hyperbole surrounding him than Ragnos.
Originally posted by NewGuy01
Well supposedly that wasn't the case in Tulak Hord's time, since supposedly he cut through hordes of Jedi single-handedly.
The only way that makes sense is if they were Dark Jedi who didn't adopt the name sith, or if some Sith converted lightside, because the Jedi of the Republic did not know about the Sith Empire.
Who said the quote talked about Sith? He killed more Jedi with his blaster alone than anyone else in history.
Which, frankly, doesn't make sense and is contradicted by his timeline.
Really whoever did the blurb, and the 'Tulak killing Jedi' one, just threw out stuff to sound cool. Now, Tulak was certainly in a place to fight force users so it makes sense to just be the wrong word, but Nadd's blaster quote really doesn't make any sense.
The Hundred Year Darkness had individuals fight Jedi for a century.
Nadd killed his Jedi master, wandered for awhile, and then was attacked and killed by a team of Jedi. And in that, he got a better kill count with just his blaster than people who fought in wars for a much longer period?
It's hyperbole that doesn't match up for known data.
It'd be akin to listing Vong kill counts of a KotoR character. It just does not make sense, and even if, say, a New Sith War character was listed as having an "Axe that killed more Yuuzhan Vong than any blaster," the correct response is to be quite suspicious of that quote.
The quote was in KOTOR II, so it applies to Revan's and Exar's reign as well.
It's pretty clear Exar's considered stronger than him, for one point.
Originally posted by Q99 The only way that makes sense is if they were Dark Jedi who didn't adopt the name sith, or if some Sith converted lightside, because the Jedi of the Republic did not know about the Sith Empire.
It's called a retcon.
Really whoever did the blurb, and the 'Tulak killing Jedi' one, just threw out stuff to sound cool.
Nadd's blaster quote really doesn't make any sense.
What, so your argument is that canon is invalid because you deem it so?