Nearly 50 Republicans possibly break the law to spite Obama

http://thedailybanter.com/2015/03/how-not-to-do-diplomacy/

❌

Damn shame that there are idiots out there who actually support these sleezy scumbags.

"Any agreement you make with Obama won't matter because we have the ball and he has to go home soon anyways!"

Yeah, acting like spoiled insolent children, but that's been the attitude towards Obama for years

edit: I know it won't happen, but it would be hilarious if the DOJ goes after them

Originally posted by Robtard
"Any agreement you make with Obama won't matter because we have the ball and he has to go home soon anyways!"

Yeah, acting like spoiled insolent children, but that's been the attitude towards Obama for years

edit: I know it won't happen, but it would be hilarious if the DOJ goes after them

Isn't that what he did to congress with immigration? 😆

The constitution says what it says for a reason. Unless congress is supposed to not uphold the constitution in your opinion.

Also DOJ cannot go after Congressional members for upholding constitutional conflicts because the parties dont agree.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
Isn't that what he did to congress with immigration? 😆

The constitution says what it says for a reason. Unless congress is supposed to not uphold the constitution in your opinion.

Also DOJ cannot go after Congressional members for upholding constitutional conflicts because the parties dont agree.

Is it? Seems it's still under review.

So you're saying these congressional Republicans did this because of the Constitution? Not following you here.

See above.

And the clown show continues...

So Hilary didn't break the law even thought she clearly didn't and its passed off as "oh I didn't know!?" But the senators did break it when it's within their powers given by constitution?

Hahahahaha

Rob you clearly gone mad.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
So Hilary didn't break the law even thought she clearly didn't and its passed off as "oh I didn't know!?" But the senators did break it when it's within their powers given by constitution?

Hahahahaha

Rob you clearly gone mad.

1. Hillary did not break the law because it was not passed until a year after she was no longer in office.

2. These 47 did break the law because what they did is not within their Constitutional authority.

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
So Hilary didn't break the law even thought she clearly didn't

She clearly didn't 👆

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
1. Hillary did not break the law because it was not passed until a year after she was no longer in office.

2. These 47 did break the law because what they did is not within their Constitutional authority.

Wrong you have no idea what you are taking about.

Little history lesson Hilary was one of the lawyers the prosecuted Nixon for his hiding recorded tapes. She was also the one who went after Colin Powell for his email and she went after Bush openly for White House secret emails as well.

2. Nancy Pelosi went and vosted Syria during the Bush Administration when he was not on speaking terms with them.

Again you are off point and on the wrong side. Look up the laws and past discrepancies before you open your mouth.

Originally posted by Lestov16
She clearly didn't 👆

Clearly she did. Are you high? Why are her computers being investigated and she has already admitted she didn't follow the rules.

I'm just saying what you said.

Originally posted by Lestov16
I'm just saying what you said.

Yea and I guess you think her taking donations from foreign countries is A-ok too. Hmm do you stand for anything?

Thought so.. clown

Originally posted by Time Immemorial
So Hilary didn't break the law even thought she clearly didn't and its passed off as "oh I didn't know!?" But the senators did break it when it's within their powers given by constitution?

Hahahahaha

Rob you clearly gone mad.

Your non sequitur aside (because you just went from Obama to Hilary), as other people pointed out, it seems she didn't actually break any law(s).

Can you show me where in the Constitution it gives Senators the right to deal/dictate foreign policy directly?

Because on the surface if does seem like those 47 Roguelicans did try their hand at being the Executive Branch of the government and if you've ever read up on the Foreign Policy of the US, you'd eventually read something like this:

"The president and the executive branch have the most significant role in making foreign policy and are responsible for carrying it out. With the advice and consent of the Senate, the president makes treaties and appoints ambassadors. The president can hold summit meetings with world leaders. As commander in chief of the military, the president can, by executive order, rapidly project U.S. power around the globe." Link

Though I doubt anything will happen to those 47 even if there ever is an investigation and it is found that they indeed did commit a crime. So you can relax, your heroes are safe.

The Senate was simply telling Iran how our constitution works.

If you read the letter, you'd see it was an attempt to possibly sway foreign policy/relations with Iran when the President is currently dealing with Iran.

But that bit in the Constitution you said existed, can you copy/paste it for me here? Curious to read it.

It's common knowledge that congress must ratify the deal and any agreement made with Itan and Obama without it being ratified is just an executive agreement and can be pulled by the next president.

This isn't you showing me what you claimed existed. Anyhow; moving on.

The fact that the branches have to effectively vote on and approve any deal/treaty the President should make with Iran is besides the point of these 47 Republicans possibly overstepping their authority and breaking the law. See now?

Ah so this is somehow different then Pelosi visiting Syria?

Your so blind

So now your argument shifts to: "well, someone else broke the law first!" You realize that doesn't excuse these 47 if they indeed did break the law, right?

I have virtual eagle-vision.