How Powerful Is Ahsoka Now?

Started by |King Joker|36 pages
|King Joker| Your Excellency

I think Dave and/or Kinberg said this is Vader in his prime. Someone said it I'm pretty sure at one of the panels.

Zenwolf Senior Member
Originally posted by |King Joker|
I think Dave and/or Kinberg said this is Vader in his prime. Someone said it I'm pretty sure at one of the panels.

Say wha?...

So Vader is stunted and can't grow more powerful?...I know he lost potential, but that doesn't mean he should be stunted and doesn't mean he can't still grow, he just can't reach the potential he was suppose to be...obviously.

...That's kinda lame tbh.

ares834 Senior Member

Don't really see the problem. At that time, Vader has "plateaued". It makes sense.

Plus, as an added bonus, it gets rid of that bogus that he improves dramatically between ANH and ESB.

Zenwolf Senior Member

Originally posted by ares834
Don't really see the problem. At that time, Vader has "plateaued". It makes sense.

Plus, as an added bonus, it gets rid of that bogus that he improves dramatically between ANH and ESB.

Why can't he improve exactly? He can still improve his saber skill or become more precise with his TK ability, or figuring out new ways to utilize it.

ares834 Senior Member

Sure, he can still improve but only slightly.

Zenwolf Senior Member
Originally posted by ares834
Sure, he can still improve but only slightly.

Why only slightly? I'm not seeing any reason as to why he can't improve greatly, he just can't reach his potential.

Plus considering Marvel and the way they do their characters and so forth, Vader is probably gonna be busting out immense TK feats at some point. Which Vader should have the highest or 2nd highest TK showings in mythos, considering that's all he can really do Force wise.

Darth Abonis Senior Member

They should do a 3-1, and Vader kills all 3 at once. Kanan, Ezra AND Ahsoka. That way, it makes the duel with Obi-Wan more meaningful. Vader is super confident, and Obi-Wan is a true Master that has only atrophied with age.

FreshestSlice Eternal Commander

Originally posted by Dark-Kenshin
I don't think so. They killed off the Inquisitor without a second thought.

The Inquisitor was a plot device. Ashoka is character, one that's been a part of Star Wars for awhile now. She's not comparable to the Inquisitor in the slightest. I mean guess both have lightsabers and are Force Sensitive, but that's about it.

Zenwolf Senior Member

Sill can't believe they just offed the Inquisitor like that...would have been nice to explore his character a little more at least.

ares834 Senior Member
Originally posted by Zenwolf
Why only slightly? I'm not seeing any reason as to why he can't improve greatly, he just can't reach his potential.

But that's what I'm getting at. He could have already reached (or be very close to it) his "max potential" as Vader.

Zenwolf Senior Member
Originally posted by ares834
But that's what I'm getting at. He could have already reached (or be very close to it) his "max potential" as Vader.

Hm...ok I see now, it could be considering Rebels if 14 years after ROTS, I thought it was shorter for some reason.

Still though we shall see what Vader is capable of in Rebels, I just hope he isn't treated like a joke. I know they said they respect Vader and all, but I usually don't take stock into words much unless it's backed up.

|King Joker| Your Excellency

Since some of you think Ahsoka will all of a sudden be extremely powerful when she shouldn't, how powerful do you think she should be at this time?

ares834 Senior Member

Should be a bit better than your average Jedi Master I guess.

|King Joker| Your Excellency

Already is. :no2:

In Legends at least. *shrug*

Zenwolf Senior Member
Originally posted by ares834
Should be a bit better than your average Jedi Master I guess.

Like this, but this is of course if she has been fighting throughout. I mean yeah she is apart of the Rebellion, but at the same time she could also have done more than fighting.

But anyway Joker, why are you against this exactly?

WildBantha88 Senior Member

They wanted "Inquisitor" to set up THE Inquisitors, opening up a new realm of characters to create and explore. Yes I like the original but hopefully we will get a bunch more Inquisitors that are more powerful/skilled/badass

|King Joker| Your Excellency

Originally posted by Zenwolf
Like this, but this is of course if she has been fighting throughout. I mean yeah she is apart of the Rebellion, but at the same time she could also have done more than fighting.

But anyway Joker, why are you against this exactly?

Against what?

Originally posted by WildBantha88
They wanted "Inquisitor" to set up THE Inquisitors, opening up a new realm of characters to create and explore. Yes I like the original but hopefully we will get a bunch more Inquisitors that are more powerful/skilled/badass
👆

And they will.

ares834 Senior Member

Originally posted by |King Joker|
Already is. :no2:

In Legends at least. *shrug*

Not in Disney Canon though. Which, considering Rebels is a part of it, I'm obviously talking about.

|King Joker| Your Excellency

Originally posted by ares834
Not in Disney Canon though. Which, considering Rebels is a part of it, I'm obviously talking about.
Your average Jedi Masters were buttraped on Geonosis, and probably have never fought in a real lightsaber duel. Ahsoka's probably already in that ballpark during the Clone Wars in my opinion.

Zenwolf Senior Member

Originally posted by |King Joker|
Against what?

👆

And they will.

Against Ahsoka not being powerful?...Unless I interpreted this quote of yours wrong..

Since some of you think Ahsoka will all of a sudden be extremely powerful when she shouldn't

?

Also Bantha I know they used him to set up the future Inquisitors, I just..I dunno, guess would have liked to see more techniques from him.

Eh but I am excited that the GE Inquisitors are returning in this new canon.