Marvel Characters that can best Superman

Started by quanchi1129 pages

This article is not about who bests him for a majority. Gladiator absolutely can beat him. Lots of marvel characters would beat him. In marvel he'd be another slightly more competent Gladiator.

Originally posted by relentless1
Surfer and Phoenix, thats about it

LOL at you thinking that Superman would beat Galactus.

Everyone on that list can beat him. 90 to 98% can pull a majority or outright stomp.

That's a pretty random list. Kallark and Norrin with Phoenix and big G? What did he, troll CBR and Comicvine Superman fights?

So much butthurt in this article, I loled though ^^.

Would beat Superman for sure:
Galactus
Phoenix Force

Have a good chance to beat Superman:
Runner with the Gem

Might beat Superman or stalemate him:
Silver Surfer (weakness exploration)
Thanos
Sentry

Would most likely lose:
Gladiator
Apocalypse
WBH

IYO, WBH, Apoc and Glads will be beaten 10/10 by Supes?

Because the article is saying whether they can beat him or not, even if it is 1/10...

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
IYO, WBH, Apoc and Glads will be beaten 10/10 by Supes?

Because the article is saying whether they can beat him or not, even if it is 1/10...

No, not 10/10, they would win maybe 1-4/10. I though my wording was clear ^^.

Originally posted by quanchi112
In marvel he'd be another slightly more competent Gladiator.

Even for a Thanosi, your idiocy is outrageous.

Kallark's best is equivalent to Superman at his most mediocre.

You forgot to say

LIES!

Originally posted by Prof. T.C McAbe
So much butthurt in this article, I loled though ^^.

Would beat Superman for sure:
Galactus
Phoenix Force

Have a good chance to beat Superman:
Runner with the Gem

Might beat Superman or stalemate him:
Silver Surfer (weakness exploration)
Thanos
Sentry

Would most likely lose:
Gladiator
Apocalypse
WBH

Are you kidding me? I respect you knowledge, but WBH, Sentry and Thanos are CLEARLY above, Surfer would win a clear majority.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Not surfer, Thor or Gladiator.

Carry on.

To say neither Thor nor Surfer who are at the very least equals with Superman, couldn't POSSIBLY beat Superman is nothing short of fanboyism.

Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
Are you kidding me? I respect you knowledge, but WBH, Sentry and Thanos are CLEARLY above, Surfer would win a clear majority.

Pointless arguing against him about it. He hates both Thanos and World Breaker.

Originally posted by carver9
Pointless arguing against him about it. He hates both Thanos and World Breaker.

I personally give WWH the majority over Superman much less WBH which is overkill.

I kind of hate whoever wrote that article. Why are you bringing up Galactus? Yes, he could slap Superman down, but there are so many beings less powerful then Big G that could do it..you might as well of just put "Eternity" and "Death" on the list.

This same person then feels Hulk can beat Superman? Or Apocalypse can? Good lord no. That is Hulk fanboyism.

Hulk only defeats a Superman who is fighting like an utter moron. Which I guess is an accomplishment? I certainly couldn't defeat a Superman fighting like a moron so..points? Hulk certainly doesn't belong on a list with the likes of Silver Surfer, Thanos, Sentry, and Galactus.

Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
I personally give WWH the majority over Superman much less WBH which is overkill.

Some people agree with this as well and I think WWH would slaughter him but I just wanted to let you know ahead of time to prepare for a long debate. The hate in him is strong. He's still a cool guy though.

Originally posted by Surtur
I kind of hate whoever wrote that article. Why are you bringing up Galactus? Yes, he could slap Superman down, but there are so many beings less powerful then Big G that could do it..you might as well of just put "Eternity" and "Death" on the list.

This same person then feels Hulk can beat Superman? Or Apocalypse can? Good lord no. That is Hulk fanboyism.

Why is it so hard to imgine Apocolypse beating him? Because he doesn't have space feats? He has the power and the versatility, you are just huge up on him being an X-Foe.

Originally posted by Surtur
I kind of hate whoever wrote that article. Why are you bringing up Galactus? Yes, he could slap Superman down, but there are so many beings less powerful then Big G that could do it..you might as well of just put "Eternity" and "Death" on the list.

This same person then feels Hulk can beat Superman? Or Apocalypse can? Good lord no. That is Hulk fanboyism.

Or you know nothing of the Hulk. Current Superman writer said that Hulk would beat an AMPED Superman. Wouldn't throw off the fan card there either. Moral of the story is, people have different opinions. Your opinion is no better than anyone's here. Especially based off what the character have done.

Originally posted by carver9
Some people agree with this as well and I think WWH would slaughter him but I just wanted to let you know ahead of time to prepare for a long debate. The hate in him is strong. He's still a cool guy though.

There will be no debate. I have a good understanding of what level he was portrayed at, and it was high high herald. The deciding factor is that if they were to meet, WWH would be super fueled by rage. If now, then he wouldn't be WWH. Wearing out Sentry is unthinkable.

Originally posted by Blue Area Vet
Why is it so hard to imgine Apocolypse beating him? Because he doesn't have space feats? He has the power and the versatility, you are just huge up on him being an X-Foe.

Because he consistently isn't powerful enough. If you want to go by high end non consistent feats fine, but then we do the same for Supes and he still blows Apocalypse away. His being an X-Foe is irrelevant.

Originally posted by carver9
Or you know nothing of the Hulk. Current Superman writer said that Hulk would beat an AMPED Superman. Wouldn't throw off the fan card there either. Moral of the story is, people have different opinions. Your opinion is no better than anyone's here. Especially based off what the character have done.

Moral of the story is the current Superman writer just plain does not know what the f*ck he is talking about. I mean holy shit that is up there with Joss Whedon's "Buffy is Spider-Man level strong!" comments.

I think you need to stop repeating asinine claims from people in the comic business. Even if you don't believe their asinine claims, it doesn't help. This harkens back to the "Marvel said Hulk is stronger then Celestials!" thing.

Originally posted by Surtur
Because he consistently isn't powerful enough. If you want to go by high end non consistent feats fine, but then we do the same for Supes and he still blows Apocalypse away.

Moral of the story is the current Superman writer just plain does not know what the f*ck he is talking about. I mean holy shit that is up there with Joss Whedon's "Buffy is Spider-Man level strong!" comments.

Marvel doesn't make it a habit of constanty displaying cheesy strength feats. They have a more realistic and mature audience. You don't often see this sort of dick measuring: