The first two paragraphs of article. She made those comments indirectly blaming Trump just a day after the SC shootings, iirc. It was pretty obvious to Trump, me, and many others that she was "hinting" at Trump being responsible. Here is a clearer article from ABC news:
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Or he misunderstood.
When others pointed it out, he doubled-down on it.
"And to the other idiots (the ones I don't have on ignore, yet), no, I didn't make a mistake in making this thread. I read everything that was in the link and it doesn't make what i said ANY less true, sorry. " -Star
I guess he just wants it to be true hard enough to somehow make it true?
Originally posted by Q99
When others pointed it out, he doubled-down on it."And to the other idiots (the ones I don't have on ignore, yet), no, I didn't make a mistake in making this thread. I read everything that was in the link and it doesn't make what i said ANY less true, sorry. " -Star
I guess he just wants it to be true hard enough to somehow make it true?
Cross quoting and back/past quotin gets old Q99. Grow up. Anyone resorting to "let me find anything a person has ever said and use it against them." Shouldn't be taken serious. You don't like when people do it Hilary, why do to others.
Glad you agree that Hillary didn't blame Trump for the SC shooting as some silly people believe.
Anyhow, I don't see what she said as "beating around the bush", she was calling for people with voices that reach the masses to be more responsible with what they say. Take Trump for example, love him or hate him, he's famous, influential and what he says reaches the ears of millions most likely, so he should be more responsible with his mouth, considering that. Seems reasonable, if anything.
Originally posted by Robtard
Glad you agree that Hillary didn't blame Trump for the SC shooting as some silly people believe.Anyhow, I don't see what she said as "beating around the bush", she was calling for people with voices that reach the masses to be more responsible with what they say. Take Trump for example, love him or hate him, he's famous, influential and what he says reaches the ears of millions most likely, so he should be more responsible with his mouth, considering that. Seems reasonable, if anything.
On the other hand I feel that everyone, regardless of how many people their voice might reach, should be more responsible with what they say.
This is also a moot point. If someone is so stupid and mentally ill something someone says can incite them to go kill people..sooner or later something would of set this person off. You can't blame what people say on that, crazy finds a way.
Just got new insight into Liberal Mindset on wrong doing and lying.
Was talking to a family member actually.
Asked my aunt "Why did Clinton lie about having sexual relations with Monica."
Her response: "He technically did not lie, because he didn't actual have sex with her"
😂😂
Case closed, you can never trust a liberal politician.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Just got new insight into Liberal Mindset on wrong doing and lying.Was talking to a family member actually.
Asked my aunt "Why did Clinton lie about having sexual relations with Monica."
Her response: "He technically did not lie, because he didn't actual have sex with her"
😂😂
Case closed, you can never trust a liberal politician.
Case closed indeed, it's a bummer that you found the speaker for all liberals (coincidentally your aunt), but since you did, and she said that, this case is irrevocably closed...
Originally posted by Bardock42
Case closed indeed, it's a bummer that you found the speaker for all liberals (coincidentally your aunt), but since you did, and she said that, this case is irrevocably closed...
My aunt and uncle have huge influence, have been to white house 8 times, met every Democratic President since JFK.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Cross quoting and back/past quotin gets old Q99. Grow up. Anyone resorting to "let me find anything a person has ever said and use it against them." Shouldn't be taken serious. You don't like when people do it Hilary, why do to others.
Hm? I don't have a problem with people checking what someone actually said. Why would you think I do? Heck, with Hillary, what I have a problem with is when people try and misrepresent what was said and/or flat out make stuff up. If she actually makes a comment still applicable on the subject, posting it is fine. If one treats a minor comment as something huge and world-shaking, I'm going to roll my eyes, but it's not the fetching of the comment that's the problem there, merely the overreaction.
We were talking about what people actually said on the topic just a few days ago. Of course there's nothing wrong with actually showing what was said rather than talking about it.
Showing what was actually said is how one establishes stuff.
I don't think you and Star realize just how much saying stuff that's wrong, then acting like you weren't wrong about anything because that was days/weeks/whatever ago hurts your credibility. It really feels like you're here to cheerlead and reinforce each other's hyperbole at times rather than actually support arguments.
Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
Just got new insight into Liberal Mindset on wrong doing and lying.Was talking to a family member actually.
Asked my aunt "Why did Clinton lie about having sexual relations with Monica."
Her response: "He technically did not lie, because he didn't actual have sex with her"
😂😂
Case closed, you can never trust a liberal politician.
Yeah, Clinton claiming oral sex is not really "sex" is hilarious.