Supreme Court Rules Same-Sex Marriage a Right (5-4)

So you read it again, saw how your trolling attempt failed and are bitching now.

I also agree with Robtard's reading. I don't see him saying that all Religion is irrational intolerance, just that Religion is sometimes used to hide ones irrational intolerance behind"

Originally posted by Robtard
So you read it again, saw how your trolling attempt failed and are bitching now.

Poor guy. Doesn't know the definition of "troll". Definitely amusing 😂

just that Religion is sometimes used to hide ones irrational intolerance behind"

If that's what he's saying he's right. It just seems that he's subtly hinting at religion being a form of irrational intolerance.

Okay then, so you didn't purposely try to twist what he was saying in order to troll, you just have poor reading comprehension skills. Work on that.

Originally posted by psmith81992
Poor guy. Doesn't know the definition of "troll". Definitely amusing 😂

If that's what he's saying he's right. It just seems that he's subtly hinting at religion being a form of irrational intolerance.

Nooo, I'm sure he is a reasonable guy, he knows that, while all Religions are irrational, not all of them are intolerant.

Originally posted by Robtard
Okay then, so you didn't purposely try to twist what he was saying in order to troll, you just have poor reading comprehension skills. Work on that.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Nooo, I'm sure he is a reasonable guy, he knows that, while all Religions are irrational, not all of them are intolerant.

Originally posted by psmith81992
Nope, I didn't. Work on your presumptuous and understanding of certain words, then try again.

Work on your reading comprehension skills. Might as well work on your grammar while you're at it.

Because Religions are not based on facts, but faith.

Originally posted by psmith81992
This sentence makes no sense. You're equating religion with "irrational intolerance". That seems irrationally intolerant to me.

Originally posted by psmith81992
If that's what he's saying he's right. It just seems that he's subtly hinting at religion being a form of irrational intolerance.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Nooo, I'm sure he is a reasonable guy, he knows that, while all Religions are irrational, not all of them are intolerant.

EDIT: Nah but really, there are rational reasons to believe in God, not convinced on the worshiping part though.

Originally posted by Robtard
Work on your reading comprehension skills. Might as well work on your grammar while you're at it.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
For all their belly-itching, opponents of gay marriage still can't explain what harm gay marriage does to them or how it tramples on their freedoms in any reasonable way, so they instead try to criticize the mechanism by which the legalization was achieved.

I don't believe I have had any opposition against it. What I said was the way they went about getting it done. Two different mechanisms. Its sad you can't separate the two issues, however this is the usual con people have a hard time seeing through.

Originally posted by Robtard
So you read it again, saw how your trolling attempt failed and are bitching now.

👆

Originally posted by Trocity
👆

He seems to have not been trolling, just his reading comprehension is mediocre.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
I don't believe I have had any opposition against it. What I said was the way they went about getting it done. Two different mechanisms. Its sad you can't separate the two issues, however this is the usual con people have a hard time seeing through.

Okay then, how should have marriage-equality (ie rights) been handled?

On a state level. As I read the constitution there was nothing really in the constitution about governing marriage, gay or straight.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
On a state level. As I read the constitution there was nothing really in the constitution about governing marriage, gay or straight.

That's the problem though, states can't (or at least shouldn't) be allowed to discriminate on people's rights. That's why the SC stepped in and said "No, you're going against the 14th Amendment and that's wrong" to those states where marriage-equality was not had.

Originally posted by Robtard
That's the problem though, states can't (or at least shouldn't) be allowed to discriminate on people's rights. That's why the SC stepped in and said "No, you're going against the 14th Amendment and that's wrong" to those states where marriage-equality was not had.

So the SC trolled the nation and said "No you" 😆

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
So the SC trolled the nation and said "No you" 😆

No, they did their job, they upheld the Constitution. What's shameful is that it was a 5/4 cast, when something like this should have been 9/0.

He seems to have not been trolling, just his reading comprehension is mediocre.

Because Religions are not based on facts, but faith.