I know, I'm questioning the morality of this logic though. It's a more of a rhetorical question. Really, I'm getting into deeper topics like moral absolutism vs moral relativism, assignment of natural human rights, and other metaphysical concepts. Do gays deserve human rights? Is it okay to deny someone human rights based on religion? Is a God who denies human rights a God worth being worshipped? Again, I ask these questions rhetorically.
All people deserve rights, but how do you take the rights of life liberty and the pursuit of happyness and religious freedom from some and then take it away from others?
Any business has the protection to refuse service to anyone. If a gay couple wants a cake at a place that refuses, there are plenty of other places that will bake them one. Whats the point of taking those people to court to take away their rights and freedoms when you can go somewhere else.
Besides, if I was gay, and someone didn't want to bake me a cake, I would not want them too. Its simple common sense really.
Am with TI on this. You have the right to deny business to anyone no matter there sex, race, political views and gender because it's you're right. Right and wrong plays no part in it, and you shouldn't fear of repercussions of being sued.
If someone walked up too me and said they hate Blacks, as a Black man i wouldn't give it a ****. Why? It's that person right. As long as he's not threaten my safety and he's not impeding on my freedom, am jolly.