Indestructible Hulk vs World War Hulk

So I've been thinking they're pretty much equal but I'm curious of opinions.

Basically the question is did Hulk lose his WWHulk powerup after Pak left and he stopped being genius Hulk? And if not, what personality would prevail in a fight?

I was thinking Waid and things based off Waid's Hulk for Indestructible. Slip Aaron's Hulk in there if you feel like it. The limit is the Doc Green series.

For WWHulk it's Planet Hulk to basically when Pak left, and writers basing it off his persona. No Savage Loeb Hulk. No Worldbreaker either.

No BFR. Fight to KO. They start the fight in a... I don't know, a giant tampon but they can go anywhere after.

Who wins?

Greenscar is more powerful but Indestructible Hulk, even after Pak was being called World Breaker. That name has stuck with him.

What is the best durability feat for Indestructible Hulk?

Having the weight of a sun on him and tanking an ongoing attack that can melt adamantium. Tanking a weapon that can rip matter on a subatomic level.

pretty damn equal imo....indestr had better speed feats though, so, IH for the blitz win. 👆

Originally posted by carver9
Having the weight of a sun on him

Just to ask....Where was the Hulk when this happened?

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Just to ask....Where was the Hulk when this happened? [/B]

In the next panel:

http://s20.postimg.org/7oq8p8rpp/Hulk_Tanks_Weight_of_Star_Infinity_006_003.jpg

Originally posted by carver9
tanking an ongoing attack that can melt adamantium.

This never happened, though.

Yes, it did. Numerous of people have went against you on this. I'm not debating the topic again, but, you can believe what you want.

Originally posted by carver9
Yes, it did. Numerous of people have went against you on this. I'm not debating the topic again, but, you can believe what you want.

Lol, numerous? Who?

Here is the thread. So others can see how you are lying RIGHT now.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=573795&pagenumber=2

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Lol, numerous? Who?

Here is the thread. So others can see how you are lying RIGHT now.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=573795&pagenumber=2

😂

That isn't the only thread we discussed that in. We discussed it in the respect thread as well when it was posted along with numerous of other threads. I'm not debating that topic anymore, believe what you want buddy. Hulk resisted an adamantium melting weapon (lol, and you switched your argument so much about that scene that I don't even know what you were arguing anymore).

Originally posted by carver9
😂

That isn't the only thread we discussed that in. We discussed it in the respect thread as well when it was post along with numerous of other threads. I'm not debating that topic anymore, believe what you want buddy. Hulk resisted an adamantium melting weapon (lol, and you switched your argument so much about that scene that I don't even know what you were arguing anymore).

Then post the numerous people who went against me.

My argument is the same as it always was.

Mad Thinker's weapon was inspired by Ultron's QM (his words). Does not mean it is actually capable of doing it. I made a toy out of an LED torch and a piece of piping - it was inspired by Star Wars lightsabres. Does not mean that my toy = a real life sabre.

Mad Thinker is smart, true. Ultron-level? No. In the same way, his tech is not = Ultron.

Therefore, the weapon he used against Hulk, whilst powerful, does not mean that it is the same.

PS: Post the Bishop scene.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Then post the numerous people who went against me.

My argument is the same as it always was.

Mad Thinker's weapon was inspired by Ultron's QM (his words). Does not mean it is actually capable of doing it. I made a toy out of an LED torch and a piece of piping - it was inspired by Star Wars lightsabres. Does not mean that my toy = a real life sabre.

Mad Thinker is smart, true. Ultron-level? No. In the same way, his tech is not = Ultron.

Therefore, the weapon he used against Hulk, whilst powerful, does not mean that it is the same.

PS: Post the Bishop scene.

Ok.

By the way, you started your argument off by saying that Mad Thinker was talking about regular 'metal', not adamantium. Then you circled and brought up the capabilities of the weapon. Anyways...believe what you want.

Just know that Hulk resisted an adamantium melting weapon. 👆

Such as?

Originally posted by carver9
Yes, it did. Numerous of people have went against you on this. I'm not debating the topic again, but, you can believe what you want.

Matter manipulation resistance feat =/= durability feat.

Hulk's always been resistant to matter manipulation. And the weapon was only inspired by Ultron's mechanism.

I think Hulk wins here. My boy takes this solidly.

-Biggest Hulk fan eva

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Matter manipulation resistance feat =/= durability feat.

Hulk's always been resistant to matter manipulation. And the weapon was only inspired by Ultron's mechanism.

Why doesn't resisting Matter Man not equal a durability showing?

Because it's a specific trait. Not a sheer toughness. You won't be turning Dr Strange into a frog for example, but you can still knock his teeth out (if his auto-shields happen to malfunction).

It's one of those weird things about the Hulk. Same with seeing ghosts/astral projections.

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
Because it's a specific trait. Not a sheer toughness. You won't be turning Dr Strange into a frog for example, but you can still knock his teeth out (if his auto-shields happen to malfunction).

It's one of those weird things about the Hulk. Same with seeing ghosts/astral projections.

👆

True.

i don't know what carv and saint are arguing about, but i've seen carv wtfpwn saint enough times to know it DOESN'T MATTER WHAT SAINT THINKS! i agree with carver. 👆