Re: Thanos vs Supermans
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
I honestly don't want this to turn into a shit-fest, so try and behave.How many DCNU Supermans can Thanos take on and defeat?
2) Preboot Supermans
Re: Thanos vs Supermans
Originally posted by Adam Grimes
I honestly don't want this to turn into a shit-fest, so try and behave.How many DCNU Supermans can Thanos take on and defeat?
2) Preboot Supermans
Thanos has been written pretty got darn high lately. To beat him, it's going to take a lot but to give him a fight? DCNU Superman alone would get destroyed but I think 1 Pre Reboot Superman could give him a fight (will lose). 2 will have a temp advantage (and lose) and 3 is overkill imo.
I'm going to debunk Thanos durability against blunt force.
If you look at his entire history of all the times he was struck by a high Herald you would see that he was always affected. He never once no sold a blunt force strike from a high Herald. That's because all writer's write him with the durability to be affected by high Herald blunt attacks.
So to magically assume that Thanos is not going to be affected by the blunt force of Superman in a forum is asinine. Once Superman knows how durable and tough a character is then he will adjust accordingly, like he does with Darkseid.
It's Superman speed and, most importantly, reflexes that will make him stomp Thanos with ease in a forum fight. He would always view Thanos in slow motion and thus making his fight against him easy. In a comic, character's reflexes is often ignored for the sake of the story.
So 1 Preboot Supes stomps and 1 dcNu Superman wins a fair majority.
Originally posted by h1a8Nope
I'm going to debunk Thanos durability against blunt force.
If you look at his entire history of all the times he was struck by a high Herald you would see that he was always affected. He never once no sold a blunt force strike from a high Herald. That's because all writer's write him with the durability to be affected by high Herald blunt attacks.So to magically assume that Thanos is not going to be affected by the blunt force of Superman in a forum is asinine. Once Superman knows how durable and tough a character is then he will adjust accordingly, like he does with Darkseid.
It's Superman speed and, most importantly, reflexes that will make him stomp Thanos with ease in a forum fight. He would always view Thanos in slow motion and thus making his fight against him easy. In a comic, character's reflexes is often ignored for the sake of the story.
So 1 Preboot Supes stomps and 1 dcNu Superman wins a fair majority.
Originally posted by h1a8Lmao it's funny to see you still pedalling this shit no gives a flying f*ck about.
I'm going to debunk Thanos durability against blunt force.
If you look at his entire history of all the times he was struck by a high Herald you would see that he was always affected. He never once no sold a blunt force strike from a high Herald. That's because all writer's write him with the durability to be affected by high Herald blunt attacks.So to magically assume that Thanos is not going to be affected by the blunt force of Superman in a forum is asinine. Once Superman knows how durable and tough a character is then he will adjust accordingly, like he does with Darkseid.
It's Superman speed and, most importantly, reflexes that will make him stomp Thanos with ease in a forum fight. He would always view Thanos in slow motion and thus making his fight against him easy. In a comic, character's reflexes is often ignored for the sake of the story.
So 1 Preboot Supes stomps and 1 dcNu Superman wins a fair majority.
Originally posted by iceman24567So you purposely refuse to use logic and common sense in debating and Champion a lie? Why debate?
Nope
If Superman will see Thanos in slow motion then how would the fight be hard?
If Superman doesn't see Thanos in slow motion then that means he either doesn't have fast reflexes or Thanos moves at the same speed he does. We know that either of those things aren't true.
Originally posted by h1a8What you perceive as logic is just pure bias. Nothing from comics support that Thanos can't react to Superman. You spout the same nonsense and just about nobody agrees for good reason. Superman has been hit by bricks alot slower than Thanos you seem to be ignoring comics for your own benefit which is as illogical as you can get when debating based on what we see from comics. Stating the same thing over and over like a broken record doesn't make it right. You are wrong once again seems to be a habit for you.
So you purposely refuse to use logic and common sense in debating and Champion a lie? Why debate?If Superman will see Thanos in slow motion then how would the fight be hard?
If Superman doesn't see Thanos in slow motion then that means he either doesn't have fast reflexes or Thanos moves at the same speed he does. We know that either of those things aren't true.
Originally posted by iceman24567
What you perceive as logic is just pure bias. Nothing from comics support that Thanos can't react to Superman. You spout the same nonsense and just about nobody agrees for good reason. Superman has been hit by bricks alot slower than Thanos you seem to be ignoring comics for your own benefit which is as illogical as you can get when debating based on what we see from comics. Stating the same thing over and over like a broken record doesn't make it right. You are wrong once again seems to be a habit for you.
I never mentioned that Thanos can't react to Superman. That's a different argument. I only mentioned that Superman would see Thanos in slow motion. Seeing someone moving in slow motion would make for an easy fight.
So you are basically being evasive and implying that Superman won't be able to see Thanos on slow motion by shifting the argument.
Originally posted by h1a8The slow motion argument is stupid and irrelevant. If people with superspeed actually saw Thanos in slow motion like you say I agree it would be an easy fight but again comics paint a different picture which has been brought to your attention numerous times. Gladiator didn't see Thanos in slow motion and was beat to shit for his troubles comics have to support the stupid shit you çlaim for your statement to be plausible yet they don't. Thanos not being able to react to Superman's speed is actually more logical than this slow motion bullocks 🙄
Superman has superior super speed and reflexes in a forum or he doesn't.
It doesn't go both ways. Either he does or he doesn't. If he does then everything I said is true.I never mentioned that Thanos can't react to Superman. That's a different argument. I only mentioned that Superman would see Thanos in slow motion. Seeing someone moving in slow motion would make for an easy fight.
So you are basically being evasive and implying that Superman won't be able to see Thanos on slow motion by shifting the argument.
Originally posted by Iceman24567
The slow motion argument is stupid and irrelevant. If people with superspeed actually saw Thanos in slow motion like you say I agree it would be an easy fight but again comics paint a different picture which has been brought to your attention numerous times. Gladiator didn't see Thanos in slow motion and was beat to shit for his troubles comics have to support the stupid shit you çlaim for your statement to be plausible yet they don't. Thanos not being able to react to Superman's speed is actually more logical than this slow motion bullocks
Superman has both super speed and super fast reflexes. These are two different powers. It was shown on panel multiple times that Superman can view things frozen in time or in super slow motion. His super reflexes gives him that ability. Comics sometimes ignore that ability by Superman. Good thing this is a forum fight where characters fight to the best of their abilities.