This boggles the mind that a judge could give a kid essentially a rape pass because he was "corrupted" by internet porn. Seriously? Corrupted? What porn was this kid watching that made him want to screw a 5 yr. old?
They act like every time the kid would log online the evil internet would just automatically take him to porn sites. On top of that, what about the parents? You can set up parental controls to prevent kids from accessing certain websites, so why not hold them culpable for allowing the "corruption" to happen?
It is no wonder people can't take our justice system seriously. Just reading some of the statements of that article "oh he will be labeled a sexual deviant forever!". Well yes because he raped a 5 yr. old. He was 14 years old not 14 months old, he was old enough to know better.
I know kids can do stupid things and thus we don't always penalize them as harshly as adults..but there just has to be a limit, there has to be a line where you say "even though he is a young teen..he still should of known better". If an adult would of gotten several years in prison..toss the kid into juvy for the same amount. I wasn't anywhere near being "wise" when I was 14, and yet I still knew rape was wrong. They are also saying "this will follow him around forever". Well yeah, when you rape a child..that should follow you around forever.
They say they couldn't release the kids name due to legal reasons. If I was the girls father I would just release his name myself to the world. I don't think it'd be illegal to name the person who raped your child, even if the police specifically can't.